Features of the mental state of doctors of various specialties during the COVID-19 pandemic

M. Korehova, I. Novikova, A. Soloviev, M. Kirov
{"title":"Features of the mental state of doctors of various specialties during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"M. Korehova, I. Novikova, A. Soloviev, M. Kirov","doi":"10.17116/profmed20232603181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the burden on healthcare professionals at all levels has increased significantly, especially those who are at the forefront of the fight for patients' lives. Physicians directly caring for COVID-19 patients are exposed to excessive stress and significant biological and psychosocial risk. Objective. To identify the features of the mental state of doctors of various specialties during the COVID-19 pandemic. Material and methods. The study included 85 doctors of the Arkhangelsk region: 41 anesthesiologists/intensive care physicians (mean age 32.4+/-5.0 years) and 44 general practitioners (mean age 38.9+/-4.2 years). The study was conducted during the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (from May to June 2021). We used the following study methods: questionnaire, psychological testing (K. Maslach and S. Jackson Burnout Inventory (MBI), Beck's Depression Inventory, Perceived Stress Scale, World Health Organisation-Five Well-Being Index), mathematical and statistical processing of empirical data. Results and discussion. Analysis of the results showed that about half of the surveyed general practitioners and only 3 (7.3%) of the anesthesiologists/intensive care physicians had a history of COVID-19, having contracted it while performing professional duties. Manifestations of maladaptation, such as low professional competence, lack of soft skills, aggressiveness, introversion, risktaking, recklessness, and family problems, are more pronounced in anesthesiologists/intensive care physicians. They were more likely to have negative emotions and feelings, were less satisfied with themselves and life in general, and had a lower well-being index than general practitioners. General practitioners overestimated their professional burnout severity and more often complained about their state of health. Correlation analysis of the examination results for anesthesiologists/intensive care physicians allowed us to identify direct relationships between the level of perceived stress, overstrain and depression, low mood, difficulties in relationships with relatives and colleagues, dissatisfaction with various aspects of life, inverse relationships between the level of perceived stress and the well-being index. In general practitioners, direct relationships were established between perceived stress and overexertion, and inverse relationships were established between the level of perceived stress, the well-being index, and the reduction of personal achievements. Conclusion. The COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacts anesthesiologists/intensive care physicians more than general practitioners, causing negative emotions and maladaptation. In primary care physicians, the pandemic increases mobilization processes to address emerging professional challenges. Therefore, special attention should be paid to psychological support for anesthesiologists/intensive care physicians.Copyright © 2023, Media Sphera Publishing Group. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":37659,"journal":{"name":"Profilakticheskaya Meditsina","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Profilakticheskaya Meditsina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/profmed20232603181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the burden on healthcare professionals at all levels has increased significantly, especially those who are at the forefront of the fight for patients' lives. Physicians directly caring for COVID-19 patients are exposed to excessive stress and significant biological and psychosocial risk. Objective. To identify the features of the mental state of doctors of various specialties during the COVID-19 pandemic. Material and methods. The study included 85 doctors of the Arkhangelsk region: 41 anesthesiologists/intensive care physicians (mean age 32.4+/-5.0 years) and 44 general practitioners (mean age 38.9+/-4.2 years). The study was conducted during the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (from May to June 2021). We used the following study methods: questionnaire, psychological testing (K. Maslach and S. Jackson Burnout Inventory (MBI), Beck's Depression Inventory, Perceived Stress Scale, World Health Organisation-Five Well-Being Index), mathematical and statistical processing of empirical data. Results and discussion. Analysis of the results showed that about half of the surveyed general practitioners and only 3 (7.3%) of the anesthesiologists/intensive care physicians had a history of COVID-19, having contracted it while performing professional duties. Manifestations of maladaptation, such as low professional competence, lack of soft skills, aggressiveness, introversion, risktaking, recklessness, and family problems, are more pronounced in anesthesiologists/intensive care physicians. They were more likely to have negative emotions and feelings, were less satisfied with themselves and life in general, and had a lower well-being index than general practitioners. General practitioners overestimated their professional burnout severity and more often complained about their state of health. Correlation analysis of the examination results for anesthesiologists/intensive care physicians allowed us to identify direct relationships between the level of perceived stress, overstrain and depression, low mood, difficulties in relationships with relatives and colleagues, dissatisfaction with various aspects of life, inverse relationships between the level of perceived stress and the well-being index. In general practitioners, direct relationships were established between perceived stress and overexertion, and inverse relationships were established between the level of perceived stress, the well-being index, and the reduction of personal achievements. Conclusion. The COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacts anesthesiologists/intensive care physicians more than general practitioners, causing negative emotions and maladaptation. In primary care physicians, the pandemic increases mobilization processes to address emerging professional challenges. Therefore, special attention should be paid to psychological support for anesthesiologists/intensive care physicians.Copyright © 2023, Media Sphera Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
新冠肺炎大流行期间各专科医生心理状态特征
在2019冠状病毒病大流行的背景下,各级卫生保健专业人员的负担大大增加,特别是那些在为患者生命而战的最前线的医护人员。直接照顾COVID-19患者的医生面临过度压力和重大的生物和社会心理风险。目标。目的了解新冠肺炎大流行期间各专科医生的心理状态特征。材料和方法。该研究包括85名阿尔汉格尔斯克地区的医生:41名麻醉师/重症监护医师(平均年龄32.4+/-5.0岁)和44名全科医生(平均年龄38.9+/-4.2岁)。该研究是在第三波COVID-19大流行期间(2021年5月至6月)进行的。本研究采用问卷调查、心理测试(K. Maslach and S. Jackson倦怠量表、Beck抑郁量表、感知压力量表、世界卫生组织五幸福感指数)、实证数据数理统计处理等方法。结果和讨论。结果分析显示,约一半的全科医生和仅有3名(7.3%)的麻醉医师/重症监护医师有新冠肺炎病史,是在执行职务时感染的。适应不良的表现,如低专业能力、缺乏软技能、攻击性、内向、冒险、鲁莽和家庭问题,在麻醉医师/重症监护医师中更为明显。他们更有可能有负面情绪和感觉,对自己和生活的总体满意度较低,幸福感指数低于全科医生。全科医生高估了他们职业倦怠的严重程度,更经常抱怨他们的健康状况。对麻醉医师/重症监护医师的检查结果进行相关分析,发现感知压力水平、过度紧张和抑郁、情绪低落、与亲友关系困难、对生活各方面不满之间存在直接关系,感知压力水平与幸福感指数之间存在反比关系。在全科医生中,感知压力与过度劳累之间存在正相关关系,感知压力水平、幸福感指数与个人成就减少之间存在负相关关系。结论。2019冠状病毒病大流行对麻醉师/重症监护医生的负面影响大于全科医生,导致负面情绪和适应不良。在初级保健医生中,大流行加强了动员进程,以应对新出现的专业挑战。因此,麻醉医师/重症监护医师应特别重视心理支持。版权所有©Media Sphera出版集团2023版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Profilakticheskaya Meditsina
Profilakticheskaya Meditsina Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: The journal "Profilakticheskaya meditsina" (The Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health) has been published since 1997 and is intended for healthcare professionals and administrators, politicians, and scientists. A wide range of problems appearing on the pages of the journal is determined by its sociopolitical and scientific-and-practical orientations. The journal covers the problems of health promotion, the prevention and treatment of communicable and non-communicable diseases, such as cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, cancers, diabetes, injuries, and violent death. The main sections of the journal: Organization of Public Health Prevention of Communicable and Non-Communicable Diseases, Health Promotion: Policy and Strategy Sociomedical Aspects of Health Formation Medico-Demographic Aspects of Health Formation Prevention of Communicable and Non-Communicable Diseases Risk Factors for Communicable and Non-Communicable Diseases The Health of Children, Adolescents, and Young People Female Health Male Health Nutrition and Health Smoking and Health Alcohol and Health Guidelines for the Specialist Education Programs for Healthcare Specialists and Patients Experience of Regions A Specialist’s Opinion Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信