Johnatas Adelir-Alves, G. Rocha, Thiago Felipe Souza, P. C. Pinheiro, K. Freire
{"title":"Abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gears in rocky reefs of Southern Brazil","authors":"Johnatas Adelir-Alves, G. Rocha, Thiago Felipe Souza, P. C. Pinheiro, K. Freire","doi":"10.1590/S1679-87592016124806404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The intense exploitation of fishing resources has led the activity into a global crisis. However, fishing effort continues to increase despite the collapse of some of the main fish stocks (FAO, 2014). This increasing effort produces both direct and indirect impact on marine ecosystems (PAULY et al., 2002). Marine debris resulting from abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear (ALDFG) (LAIST, 1995; MACFADYEN et al., 2009) is one type of indirect impact, responsible for harming marine fauna and for causing economic loss (DAYTON et al., 1995).ALDFG captures target and non-target fish species by a phenomenon known as ‘ghost fishing’, which means that the fishing gear continues to catch fish even though fishers are no longer controlling it (SMOLOWITZ, 1978). The term is associated with mortality and injuries inflicted on vertebrates and invertebrates caught by ALDFG (BREEN, 1987; BARREIROS; RAYKOV, 2014).At least one-third of the Brazilian coast consists of reef environments, with coral reefs concentrated on the northern/northeastern coast and rocky reefs on the southeastern/southern coast. These ecosystems are highly diverse, rich in natural resources and of great ecological, economic and social importance, with immense potential for hosting endemic species (FERREIRA et al., 2001; ROCHA, 2003). There are few studies on the impact of ghost fishing in Brazil, many of them reporting the existence of marine debris and fishing gear found in coastal areas (MACHADO; FILLMANN, 2010; MASCARENHAS et al., 2008; POSSATTO et al., 2011; VIEIRA et al., 2011; DANTAS et al","PeriodicalId":55325,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Oceanography","volume":"64 1","pages":"427-434"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Oceanography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-87592016124806404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
Abstract
The intense exploitation of fishing resources has led the activity into a global crisis. However, fishing effort continues to increase despite the collapse of some of the main fish stocks (FAO, 2014). This increasing effort produces both direct and indirect impact on marine ecosystems (PAULY et al., 2002). Marine debris resulting from abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear (ALDFG) (LAIST, 1995; MACFADYEN et al., 2009) is one type of indirect impact, responsible for harming marine fauna and for causing economic loss (DAYTON et al., 1995).ALDFG captures target and non-target fish species by a phenomenon known as ‘ghost fishing’, which means that the fishing gear continues to catch fish even though fishers are no longer controlling it (SMOLOWITZ, 1978). The term is associated with mortality and injuries inflicted on vertebrates and invertebrates caught by ALDFG (BREEN, 1987; BARREIROS; RAYKOV, 2014).At least one-third of the Brazilian coast consists of reef environments, with coral reefs concentrated on the northern/northeastern coast and rocky reefs on the southeastern/southern coast. These ecosystems are highly diverse, rich in natural resources and of great ecological, economic and social importance, with immense potential for hosting endemic species (FERREIRA et al., 2001; ROCHA, 2003). There are few studies on the impact of ghost fishing in Brazil, many of them reporting the existence of marine debris and fishing gear found in coastal areas (MACHADO; FILLMANN, 2010; MASCARENHAS et al., 2008; POSSATTO et al., 2011; VIEIRA et al., 2011; DANTAS et al
对渔业资源的过度开发已导致渔业活动陷入全球危机。然而,尽管一些主要鱼类种群崩溃,捕捞努力量仍在继续增加(粮农组织,2014年)。这种不断增加的努力对海洋生态系统产生了直接和间接的影响(PAULY等人,2002年)。因丢弃、丢失或以其他方式丢弃渔具而产生的海洋碎片(1995年;MACFADYEN et al., 2009)是一种间接影响,对海洋动物造成伤害并造成经济损失(DAYTON et al., 1995)。ALDFG通过一种被称为“幽灵捕鱼”的现象捕获目标和非目标鱼类,这意味着即使渔民不再控制渔具,渔具仍在继续捕鱼(SMOLOWITZ, 1978)。该术语与ALDFG捕获的脊椎动物和无脊椎动物的死亡率和伤害有关(BREEN, 1987;巴雷罗;RAYKOV, 2014)。至少三分之一的巴西海岸由珊瑚礁环境组成,珊瑚礁集中在北部/东北海岸,岩石礁集中在东南部/南部海岸。这些生态系统高度多样化,自然资源丰富,具有重要的生态、经济和社会意义,具有巨大的寄存特有物种的潜力(FERREIRA等人,2001;罗查,2003)。关于巴西幽灵捕鱼的影响的研究很少,其中许多报告说在沿海地区发现了海洋碎片和渔具(MACHADO;FILLMANN, 2010;MASCARENHAS等人,2008;POSSATTO et al., 2011;VIEIRA et al., 2011;DANTAS等
期刊介绍:
The Brazilian Journal of Oceanography covers the entire spectrum of disciplines within the science of oceanography, publishing articles dealing with the biological oceanography, physical oceanography, marine chemistry, sedimentology and geology, from coastal and estuarine waters out to the open sea. Emphasis is placed on inter-disciplinary process-oriented contributions. BJO also publishes issues dedicated to results of scientific meetings and of large inter-disciplinary studies or topical issues on specific subjects.
The audience is composed by physical, chemical and biological oceanographers, marine sedimentologists, geologists and geochemists, marine biologists and ecologists.
Papers sent to BJO must present results from original research and be written in english.