Gaolejeunea hoi (Lejeuneaceae), a new species and generic record from Singapore

IF 0.8 4区生物学 Q4 PLANT SCIENCES

Bryologist Pub Date : 2021-11-19 DOI:10.1639/0007-2745-124.4.600

Wen Ye, Yu‐Mei Wei

引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract. Gaolejeunea was previously known as a monospecific genus endemic to China. Specimens of an undescribed species belonging to the genus were recently found in Singapore. Critical assessments of morphological characters and phylogenetic analyses based on genetic sequence data of three regions (trnL-F, rbcL, nrITS) unequivocally confirmed and supported its recognition as a new and second species of Gaolejeunea. Gaolejeunea hoi sp. nov. is here fully described and illustrated. The new species is characterized by its faintly Allorgella-type marginal denticulations, the ental hyaline papilla attached to the apical margin, the bracteoles present only at the base of each androecium, gynoecia with innovation(s), perianth with wing-shaped lateral keels.

查看原文本刊更多论文

新加坡一新种属记录

摘要高乐珠属以前被认为是中国特有的单种属。最近在新加坡发现了属于该属的一种未被描述的标本。基于trnL-F、rbcL、nrITS三个区域的遗传序列数据，对其形态特征和系统发育进行了初步评价和分析，明确证实其为高乐青属新种和第二种。这里有详细的描述和插图。新种的特征是:边缘有微allorgella型小齿，尖缘有透明状乳头，小苞片仅存在于雄蕊基部，雌蕊具创新，花被具翅形侧龙骨。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Bryologist 生物-植物科学

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

11.10%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Bryologist is an international journal devoted to all aspects of bryology and lichenology, and we welcome reviews, research papers and short communications from all members of American Bryological and Lichenological Society (ABLS). We also publish lists of current literature, book reviews and news items about members and event. All back issues of the journal are maintained electronically. The first issue of The Bryologist was published in 1898, with the formation of the Society. Author instructions are available from the journal website and the manuscript submission site, each of which is listed at the ABLS.org website. All submissions to the journal are subject to at least two peer reviews, and both the reviews and the identities of reviewers are treated confidentially. Reviewers are asked to acknowledge possible conflicts of interest and to provide strictly objective assessments of the suitability and scholarly merit of the submissions under review.