Economic analysis of fertilization management in ‘Prata-Anã’ Gorutuba banana plants

Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0100-29452022851
Matheus Pena Campos, L. A. S. Pio, J. Rufini, J. S. B. Bueno Filho, P. C. D. Melo, Ana Claudia Costa
{"title":"Economic analysis of fertilization management in ‘Prata-Anã’ Gorutuba banana plants","authors":"Matheus Pena Campos, L. A. S. Pio, J. Rufini, J. S. B. Bueno Filho, P. C. D. Melo, Ana Claudia Costa","doi":"10.1590/0100-29452022851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Brazilian banana farming is one of the most important agricultural activities in the national scenario and can be highly productive and economically profitable for producers who invest in technology. The objective of this work was to compare the economic viability of two different fertilization managements in the cultivation system of 1st -cycle ‘Prata Anã’ Gorutuba bananas. The conventional fertilization treatment (CM), adopted by the producer (control), was compared with the alternative treatment: conventional management + 3 soil conditioners + 1 biostimulant (CM + 3SC + 1B). The four products selected for the alternative treatment were oyster shell limestone, Celtonite, Lithothamnium calcareum and Acadian. The application of the four products in the CM + 3SC + 1B treatment provided satisfactory results on crop performance, mainly due to the increase of 4.032 tons ha-1. The CM+3CS+1B alternative management was more economically viable than CM, as the total operational cost (1st + 2nd year) of the alternative management was 6.71% higher compared to the conventional management; however, the alternative treatment productivity was 28.08% higher. The cost to produce one ton of bananas was R$ 2.456,91 in the conventional treatment and R$ 2.047,07 in the alternative treatment, which represents a 16.68% reduction in the average cost, indicating the economic feasibility of this treatment.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-29452022851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Brazilian banana farming is one of the most important agricultural activities in the national scenario and can be highly productive and economically profitable for producers who invest in technology. The objective of this work was to compare the economic viability of two different fertilization managements in the cultivation system of 1st -cycle ‘Prata Anã’ Gorutuba bananas. The conventional fertilization treatment (CM), adopted by the producer (control), was compared with the alternative treatment: conventional management + 3 soil conditioners + 1 biostimulant (CM + 3SC + 1B). The four products selected for the alternative treatment were oyster shell limestone, Celtonite, Lithothamnium calcareum and Acadian. The application of the four products in the CM + 3SC + 1B treatment provided satisfactory results on crop performance, mainly due to the increase of 4.032 tons ha-1. The CM+3CS+1B alternative management was more economically viable than CM, as the total operational cost (1st + 2nd year) of the alternative management was 6.71% higher compared to the conventional management; however, the alternative treatment productivity was 28.08% higher. The cost to produce one ton of bananas was R$ 2.456,91 in the conventional treatment and R$ 2.047,07 in the alternative treatment, which represents a 16.68% reduction in the average cost, indicating the economic feasibility of this treatment.
分享
查看原文
“Prata-Anã”Gorutuba香蕉植株施肥管理的经济分析
巴西香蕉种植是该国最重要的农业活动之一,对于投资于技术的生产者来说,香蕉种植具有很高的生产力和经济效益。本研究的目的是比较两种不同施肥管理在第一期“Prata Anã”Gorutuba香蕉栽培系统中的经济可行性。对生产者(对照)采用常规施肥处理(CM)与常规管理+ 3种土壤调节剂+ 1种生物刺激剂(CM + 3SC + 1B)进行比较。选择牡蛎壳灰岩、Celtonite、lithothamium calcium和Acadian四种产品进行替代处理。4种产品在CM + 3SC + 1B处理下的作物生产效果较好,主要是增产4.032 t ha-1。CM+3CS+1B替代管理比CM更具经济可行性,替代管理的总运营成本(1 + 2年)比传统管理高6.71%;替代处理的生产率提高28.08%。常规处理生产1吨香蕉的成本为2.456.91雷亚尔,替代处理生产1吨香蕉的成本为2.047.07雷亚尔,平均成本降低了16.68%,表明该处理具有经济可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信