{"title":"Evaluating the Methods for Assessing Implementation Effects of River Chief System in China","authors":"Hailong Yin, Jia''ning Ge, Zuxin Xu, Jin Xu","doi":"10.15302/j-sscae-2022.05.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Establishing a river chief system is stipulated in the newly amended Law of the People’s Republic of China on Prevention and Control of Water Pollution, which clarifies the liability of party or administrative heads at various levels for water environment rehabilitation in their own administrative regions. In this article, we analyze the implementation effects of the river chief in China, current assessment methods, and their deficiencies, and propose two quantitative assessing methods: (1) comprehensive water quality assessment for the cross sections of rivers and lakes and (2) assessment using the pollutant load intercepting rate of sewer networks, aiming to improve the scientific rationality for effect assessment of the river chief system. With Suzhou Creek rehabilitation in Shanghai as an example, application of the comprehensive water quality assessment method was introduced. By analyzing the pollutant load intercepting rate in various provinces (autonomous regions or municipalities) in China, we find that on average 34% wastewater is still discharged into water courses in an untreated state, leading to repeated occurrence of water quality deterioration. Introducing the comprehensive water quality assessment and the pollutant load intercepting rate into the river chief assessment will effectively push the government at all levels to concentrate their human, material, and financial resources onto urban drainage network correction and the interception of pollution sources discharged into watercourses.","PeriodicalId":65586,"journal":{"name":"中国工程科学","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国工程科学","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15302/j-sscae-2022.05.020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Establishing a river chief system is stipulated in the newly amended Law of the People’s Republic of China on Prevention and Control of Water Pollution, which clarifies the liability of party or administrative heads at various levels for water environment rehabilitation in their own administrative regions. In this article, we analyze the implementation effects of the river chief in China, current assessment methods, and their deficiencies, and propose two quantitative assessing methods: (1) comprehensive water quality assessment for the cross sections of rivers and lakes and (2) assessment using the pollutant load intercepting rate of sewer networks, aiming to improve the scientific rationality for effect assessment of the river chief system. With Suzhou Creek rehabilitation in Shanghai as an example, application of the comprehensive water quality assessment method was introduced. By analyzing the pollutant load intercepting rate in various provinces (autonomous regions or municipalities) in China, we find that on average 34% wastewater is still discharged into water courses in an untreated state, leading to repeated occurrence of water quality deterioration. Introducing the comprehensive water quality assessment and the pollutant load intercepting rate into the river chief assessment will effectively push the government at all levels to concentrate their human, material, and financial resources onto urban drainage network correction and the interception of pollution sources discharged into watercourses.
期刊介绍:
"Strategic Study of CAE" is supervised by the Chinese Academy of Engineering, hosted by the Strategic Consulting Center of the Chinese Academy of Engineering and Higher Education Press Limited Company, and published by the Strategic Study of CAE Editorial Department. This journal is one of the "1+9+1" series of journals of the Chinese Academy of Engineering, and its editorial board is the Consulting Working Committee of the Chinese Academy of Engineering.
This bimonthly journal is published in Chinese. It is a core Chinese journal and a core journal of Chinese science and technology, included in the Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD), the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) database, and the Swedish DOAJ database.
The journal is positioned as an academic journal for strategic consulting in engineering and technology, mainly publishing academic papers that reflect the results of strategic consulting research in China's engineering and technology. It aims to provide counsel for the government's scientific decision-making, guidance for the industry's scientific development, and references for related academic research.