Omen and Anti-omen: The Rabbinic Hagiography of the Scapegoat’s Scarlet Ribbon

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION
Mira Balberg
{"title":"Omen and Anti-omen: The Rabbinic Hagiography of the Scapegoat’s Scarlet Ribbon","authors":"Mira Balberg","doi":"10.1515/arege-2015-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article proposes that the place and meaning of various objects among religious communities can be explored in terms of “hagiography,” that is, through the narratives constructed around sacred objects sometimes long after their physical disappearance. It takes as its point of departure the assumption that in the same way that written accounts of saints’ lives disclose more about the authors of these accounts than about the protagonists, so narratives regarding “things” reveal the concerns and debates of their authors, and in particular their concerns about materiality and divine presence within physical objects. The article explores the rabbinic narratives concerning the scarlet ribbon tied to the scapegoat of the Day of Atonement, its function and its vicissitudes, as developed in the Mishnah and in the Palestinian and Babylonian Talmuds. Using both a synchronic and a diachronic lens, the article shows how the scarlet ribbon is utilized in the rabbis’ attempts to define their own times vis-à-vis earlier times, and to grapple with pressing religious uncertainties.","PeriodicalId":29740,"journal":{"name":"Archiv fur Religionsgeschichte","volume":"17 1","pages":"25 - 54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/arege-2015-0003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv fur Religionsgeschichte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/arege-2015-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article proposes that the place and meaning of various objects among religious communities can be explored in terms of “hagiography,” that is, through the narratives constructed around sacred objects sometimes long after their physical disappearance. It takes as its point of departure the assumption that in the same way that written accounts of saints’ lives disclose more about the authors of these accounts than about the protagonists, so narratives regarding “things” reveal the concerns and debates of their authors, and in particular their concerns about materiality and divine presence within physical objects. The article explores the rabbinic narratives concerning the scarlet ribbon tied to the scapegoat of the Day of Atonement, its function and its vicissitudes, as developed in the Mishnah and in the Palestinian and Babylonian Talmuds. Using both a synchronic and a diachronic lens, the article shows how the scarlet ribbon is utilized in the rabbis’ attempts to define their own times vis-à-vis earlier times, and to grapple with pressing religious uncertainties.
预兆与反预兆:拉比对替罪羊的红丝带的圣徒志
摘要本文提出,在宗教群体中,各种物体的位置和意义可以通过“圣徒化”来探索,即通过围绕神圣物体构建的叙事,有时在它们实际消失很久之后。它的出发点是这样一种假设,即圣徒生活的书面记录更多地揭示了这些记录的作者,而不是主角,所以关于“事物”的叙述揭示了作者的关注和争论,特别是他们对物质和神圣存在的关注。这篇文章探讨了拉比关于在赎罪日与替罪羊绑在一起的红丝带的叙述,它的功能和变迁,在密西拿和巴勒斯坦和巴比伦的塔木德中得到了发展。这篇文章使用共时和历时的镜头,展示了拉比们如何利用红丝带来定义他们自己的时代,与-à-vis更早的时代,并与紧迫的宗教不确定性作斗争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信