Assessment of attitudes related to humanization of assistance by medical students

Hígor Chagas Cardoso, E. Pereira, Viviane Soares, Guilherme Antônio Ferreira de Sena Soares, Vinícius Chagas Cardoso, M. Rabahi
{"title":"Assessment of attitudes related to humanization of assistance by medical students","authors":"Hígor Chagas Cardoso, E. Pereira, Viviane Soares, Guilherme Antônio Ferreira de Sena Soares, Vinícius Chagas Cardoso, M. Rabahi","doi":"10.1590/1981-5271v47.3-2023-0091.ing","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Introduction: Typical medical care has been characterized by professional and disease-centered attitudes, with little concern for focusing on the patient’s psychosocial context and expectations. However, the medical care that seeks to more globally encompass the patient’s perspective has shown to bring greater benefits. Objective: To evaluate the attitudes of medical students regarding the physician-patient relationship. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study that evaluated the attitudes of students in the 4th semester of the medical course in relation to patient care based on the application of the Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale and a questionnaire with sociodemographic and curricular characteristics. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) software and the Mann-Whitney test, Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc, and Chi-square test. Results: A total of 83 medical students participated in the study, with a prevalence of female students (74.7%), and those who declared a family income of less than US$ 2,140 (43.0%), as well as those who professed the Catholic religion (53.0%). The majority of students (85.5%) had attitudes centered on the physician and the disease (mean PPOS scores <4.57), with scores in the caring domain higher than those in the sharing domain. The variables gender, family income, student financial aid, and religion showed a positive association (p≤0.05) with PPOS scores related to patient-centered attitudes. There were no statistically significant associations of PPOS scores with the variables age group, city of origin, undergraduate research activities, extracurricular internships, artistic activities, personal and family history of serious illness, and parental level of schooling. Conclusion: The present study showed that the assessed medical students had attitudes centered on the physician and on the disease, with mean PPOS scores below the range related to attitudes of humanized medicine.","PeriodicalId":31156,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Educacao Medica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Educacao Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5271v47.3-2023-0091.ing","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Typical medical care has been characterized by professional and disease-centered attitudes, with little concern for focusing on the patient’s psychosocial context and expectations. However, the medical care that seeks to more globally encompass the patient’s perspective has shown to bring greater benefits. Objective: To evaluate the attitudes of medical students regarding the physician-patient relationship. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study that evaluated the attitudes of students in the 4th semester of the medical course in relation to patient care based on the application of the Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale and a questionnaire with sociodemographic and curricular characteristics. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) software and the Mann-Whitney test, Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc, and Chi-square test. Results: A total of 83 medical students participated in the study, with a prevalence of female students (74.7%), and those who declared a family income of less than US$ 2,140 (43.0%), as well as those who professed the Catholic religion (53.0%). The majority of students (85.5%) had attitudes centered on the physician and the disease (mean PPOS scores <4.57), with scores in the caring domain higher than those in the sharing domain. The variables gender, family income, student financial aid, and religion showed a positive association (p≤0.05) with PPOS scores related to patient-centered attitudes. There were no statistically significant associations of PPOS scores with the variables age group, city of origin, undergraduate research activities, extracurricular internships, artistic activities, personal and family history of serious illness, and parental level of schooling. Conclusion: The present study showed that the assessed medical students had attitudes centered on the physician and on the disease, with mean PPOS scores below the range related to attitudes of humanized medicine.
医学生对援助人性化态度的评估
摘要:典型的医疗保健以专业和疾病为中心的态度为特征,很少关注患者的社会心理环境和期望。然而,寻求更全面地涵盖患者观点的医疗保健已显示出更大的好处。目的:了解医学生对医患关系的态度。方法:采用横断面研究方法,应用“病人-执业者取向量表”和具有社会人口学特征和课程特征的问卷调查,对医学课程第四学期学生对病人护理的态度进行评估。数据分析采用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)软件,采用Mann-Whitney检验、Kruskal-Wallis Dunn事后检验和卡方检验。结果:共有83名医学生参与了研究,其中女学生占74.7%,家庭收入低于2140美元的占43.0%,信奉天主教的占53.0%。大多数学生(85.5%)的态度以医生和疾病为中心(PPOS平均得分<4.57),关怀领域得分高于分享领域得分。性别、家庭收入、学生资助、宗教与PPOS评分与以病人为中心的态度呈正相关(p≤0.05)。PPOS得分与年龄组、原籍城市、本科研究活动、课外实习、艺术活动、个人和家族严重疾病史、父母受教育程度等变量无统计学意义相关。结论:受访医学生的态度以医师为中心,以疾病为中心,PPOS平均分低于人性化医疗态度的相关范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
48 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书