Systems Approach: A Shortcut to the Ocean We Want

IF 1 4区 地球科学 Q3 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
M. Asmus, J. C. Costa, Laura D Prestes, Gabriela D Sardinha, Joyce G. da Cunha, Júlia N. A Ribeiro, Paula M. F Pereira, Rafaella P Bubolz, Kahuam S Gianuca, Gisele R Abrahão, Josiane Rovedder, Vanessa C Marques
{"title":"Systems Approach: A Shortcut to the Ocean We Want","authors":"M. Asmus, J. C. Costa, Laura D Prestes, Gabriela D Sardinha, Joyce G. da Cunha, Júlia N. A Ribeiro, Paula M. F Pereira, Rafaella P Bubolz, Kahuam S Gianuca, Gisele R Abrahão, Josiane Rovedder, Vanessa C Marques","doi":"10.1590/2675-2824069.21023mla","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"even religious and mys-tical. A broad way of defining and understanding the Earth’s “oceans, seas, coasts, and islands” is through a systemic vision that we define as a “Global Oceanic System-GOS”, which integrates and connects various marine spaces and the ocean as an organized unit. The ocean is a unique system connecting ecological, economic, social, and cultural components, through which goods and services regulate the planetary condition and support the development of mankind. However, its increasing use has followed the exponential growth of the global economic system, outpacing humanity’s ability to develop the knowledge necessary to establish a basis for its proper use. Hence, there is an added perception that our necessary knowledge about the functioning of the ocean for its appropriate planning and management, advances at a slow pace, with which the ocean would be losing quality and sustainability. Systemic views of the ocean tend to highlight dominant components and processes instead of structural details, establishing a quality shortcut to the knowledge where society can understand current and future ocean conditions. To achieve the desired ocean health and sustainability, we propose the formation of a base of knowledge of the marine and coastal environments, capable of supporting best practices and policies for planning and management. We drew from the interdisciplinary research developed by the Brazilian research group “Ecosystem-Based Marine and Coastal Management (Eco-MCM), ” which has been developing projects based on three fundamental steps: (1) systemic analysis of the marine and coastal environments, highlighting their ecosystems, ecosystem services, social and economic benefits produced by the services and the stakeholders benefited; (2) modeling of the studied systems, and (3) propositional phase to incorporate models to support the practices and policies for their planning, management, and governance. As such, they are aligned with the United Nations Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (2021-2030) challenges and outcomes.","PeriodicalId":19418,"journal":{"name":"Ocean and Coastal Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean and Coastal Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2675-2824069.21023mla","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

even religious and mys-tical. A broad way of defining and understanding the Earth’s “oceans, seas, coasts, and islands” is through a systemic vision that we define as a “Global Oceanic System-GOS”, which integrates and connects various marine spaces and the ocean as an organized unit. The ocean is a unique system connecting ecological, economic, social, and cultural components, through which goods and services regulate the planetary condition and support the development of mankind. However, its increasing use has followed the exponential growth of the global economic system, outpacing humanity’s ability to develop the knowledge necessary to establish a basis for its proper use. Hence, there is an added perception that our necessary knowledge about the functioning of the ocean for its appropriate planning and management, advances at a slow pace, with which the ocean would be losing quality and sustainability. Systemic views of the ocean tend to highlight dominant components and processes instead of structural details, establishing a quality shortcut to the knowledge where society can understand current and future ocean conditions. To achieve the desired ocean health and sustainability, we propose the formation of a base of knowledge of the marine and coastal environments, capable of supporting best practices and policies for planning and management. We drew from the interdisciplinary research developed by the Brazilian research group “Ecosystem-Based Marine and Coastal Management (Eco-MCM), ” which has been developing projects based on three fundamental steps: (1) systemic analysis of the marine and coastal environments, highlighting their ecosystems, ecosystem services, social and economic benefits produced by the services and the stakeholders benefited; (2) modeling of the studied systems, and (3) propositional phase to incorporate models to support the practices and policies for their planning, management, and governance. As such, they are aligned with the United Nations Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (2021-2030) challenges and outcomes.
系统方法:通往我们想要的海洋的捷径
甚至是宗教和神秘的。定义和理解地球“海洋、海岸和岛屿”的一个广泛方法是通过我们定义为“全球海洋系统”的系统愿景,它将各种海洋空间和海洋作为一个有组织的单位整合和连接起来。海洋是一个连接生态、经济、社会和文化组成部分的独特系统,通过它,商品和服务调节地球状况,支持人类发展。然而,随着全球经济系统的指数级增长,它的使用越来越多,超过了人类发展为适当使用它建立基础所必需的知识的能力。因此,还有一种看法认为,我们对海洋的功能进行适当规划和管理的必要知识进展缓慢,海洋将失去质量和可持续性。对海洋的系统看法倾向于强调主要成分和过程,而不是结构细节,从而建立了一条通往知识的高质量捷径,使社会能够了解当前和未来的海洋状况。为了实现理想的海洋健康和可持续性,我们建议建立一个海洋和沿海环境知识基础,能够支持规划和管理的最佳做法和政策。我们借鉴了巴西研究小组“基于生态系统的海洋和沿海管理(Eco-MCM)”开展的跨学科研究,该研究小组一直在开发基于三个基本步骤的项目:(1)系统分析海洋和沿海环境,突出其生态系统、生态系统服务、服务产生的社会和经济效益以及利益相关者的利益;(2)所研究系统的建模,以及(3)命题阶段,合并模型以支持其计划、管理和治理的实践和政策。因此,它们与联合国海洋科学促进可持续发展十年(2021-2030年)的挑战和成果相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信