1. The Biological Inferiority of the Undeserving Poor

Q3 Social Sciences
M. Katz
{"title":"1. The Biological Inferiority of the Undeserving Poor","authors":"M. Katz","doi":"10.1525/9780520961944-006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article excavates the definition of poor people as biologically inferior. It not only documents its persistence over time but emphasizes three themes. First, the concept rises and falls in prominence in response to institutional and programmatic failure. It offers a convenient explanation for why the optimist of reformers proved illusory or why social problems remained refractory despite efforts to eliminate them. Second, its initial formulation and reformulation rely on bridging concepts that try to parse the distance between heredity and environment. Third, hereditarian ideas always have been supported by the best science of the day.","PeriodicalId":35159,"journal":{"name":"Social Work & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Work & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520961944-006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This article excavates the definition of poor people as biologically inferior. It not only documents its persistence over time but emphasizes three themes. First, the concept rises and falls in prominence in response to institutional and programmatic failure. It offers a convenient explanation for why the optimist of reformers proved illusory or why social problems remained refractory despite efforts to eliminate them. Second, its initial formulation and reformulation rely on bridging concepts that try to parse the distance between heredity and environment. Third, hereditarian ideas always have been supported by the best science of the day.
1. 不配穷人的生物劣等性
这篇文章挖掘了穷人在生物学上劣等的定义。它不仅记录了它的持久性,而且强调了三个主题。首先,这一概念因制度和规划上的失败而起起落落。它提供了一个方便的解释,解释为什么改革者的乐观主义被证明是虚幻的,或者为什么社会问题尽管努力消除,但仍然难以解决。其次,它最初的表述和重新表述依赖于桥接概念,这些概念试图解析遗传和环境之间的距离。第三,遗传论的观点总是得到当时最好的科学的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Work & Society
Social Work & Society Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信