Predictors of response to cognitive-behavioral therapy in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review

Q4 Medicine
Jéssica M Paiva, Marina S Melani, R. Gonçalves, M. Luz, M. Mendlowicz, I. Figueira, Cheyenne von Arcosy, P. Ventura, W. Berger
{"title":"Predictors of response to cognitive-behavioral therapy in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review","authors":"Jéssica M Paiva, Marina S Melani, R. Gonçalves, M. Luz, M. Mendlowicz, I. Figueira, Cheyenne von Arcosy, P. Ventura, W. Berger","doi":"10.1590/0047-2085000000375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a highly prevalent and disabling disorder. Even when treated with the first-line intervention, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), 45% of the patients continue suffering from this disorder. Therefore, knowing the factors that could foresee who will respond to CBT would be of great value to the treatment of these patients. Thus, we have systematically reviewed the literature to identify the variables that could predict response to CBT in patients suffering from PTSD. Methods Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched the electronic databases ISI Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and PTSDpubs until November 2021. Two authors have independently conducted study selection and data extraction. Studies that examined possible predictors of response to therapy on a sample of adults (18-65 years), both genders, with and without comorbidities were considered eligible. The characteristics of the studies were synthesized in a table. The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias quality assessment tool. Results Twenty-eight studies comprising 15 variables were selected. Among those, eight showed a low risk of bias, 19 showed some concerns, and one showed a high potential risk of bias. The therapeutic relationship was the only variable considered to be a predictor of a good response to therapy. All other variables showed conflicting results. Conclusions The most promising variable, although scientifically weak, is the therapeutic relationship. Additional randomized clinical trials should be conducted to clarify the role of this variable as a predictor of response to CBT in patients with PTSD.","PeriodicalId":39594,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0047-2085000000375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a highly prevalent and disabling disorder. Even when treated with the first-line intervention, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), 45% of the patients continue suffering from this disorder. Therefore, knowing the factors that could foresee who will respond to CBT would be of great value to the treatment of these patients. Thus, we have systematically reviewed the literature to identify the variables that could predict response to CBT in patients suffering from PTSD. Methods Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched the electronic databases ISI Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and PTSDpubs until November 2021. Two authors have independently conducted study selection and data extraction. Studies that examined possible predictors of response to therapy on a sample of adults (18-65 years), both genders, with and without comorbidities were considered eligible. The characteristics of the studies were synthesized in a table. The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias quality assessment tool. Results Twenty-eight studies comprising 15 variables were selected. Among those, eight showed a low risk of bias, 19 showed some concerns, and one showed a high potential risk of bias. The therapeutic relationship was the only variable considered to be a predictor of a good response to therapy. All other variables showed conflicting results. Conclusions The most promising variable, although scientifically weak, is the therapeutic relationship. Additional randomized clinical trials should be conducted to clarify the role of this variable as a predictor of response to CBT in patients with PTSD.
创伤后应激障碍患者对认知行为治疗反应的预测因素:一项系统综述
摘要目的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)是一种高发致残的疾病。即使接受了一线干预,认知行为疗法(CBT),仍有45%的患者继续遭受这种疾病的折磨。因此,了解哪些患者会对CBT产生反应的因素对这些患者的治疗具有重要的价值。因此,我们系统地回顾了文献,以确定可以预测PTSD患者对CBT反应的变量。方法按照PRISMA 2020指南,检索ISI Web of Science、Scopus、PsycINFO、MEDLINE和PTSDpubs等电子数据库,检索时间截止到2021年11月。两位作者独立进行了研究选择和数据提取。对成年人(18-65岁),不分性别,有无合并症的治疗反应的可能预测因素的研究被认为是合格的。将研究的特点综合在一个表格中。偏倚风险采用Cochrane偏倚风险质量评估工具进行评估。结果共纳入28项研究,包含15个变量。其中,8篇偏倚风险较低,19篇偏倚风险较高,1篇偏倚风险较高。治疗关系是唯一被认为是对治疗有良好反应的预测变量。所有其他变量显示出相互矛盾的结果。结论虽然科学上薄弱,但最有希望的变量是治疗关系。应该进行额外的随机临床试验,以明确该变量作为PTSD患者对CBT反应的预测因子的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria
Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: O Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria se insere em programas de educação continuada e atualização e tem como missão divulgar trabalhos de pesquisa (realizados em instituições brasileiras e estrangeiras) cujos resultados tenham potencial para a investigação e prática clínica no campo da Psiquiatria. Criado em 1938, foi publicado até 1950, sob o título “Anais do Instituto de Psiquiatria”, sem periodicidade regular.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信