The potential spread of Covid-19 and government decision-making: a retrospective analysis in Florianópolis, Brazil.

Q2 Medicine
Leandro Pereira Garcia, J. Traebert, A. Boing, Grazielli Faria Zimmer Santos, L. Pedebôs, E. d’Orsi, P. Prado, M. Veras, Giuliano Boava, A. F. Boing
{"title":"The potential spread of Covid-19 and government decision-making: a retrospective analysis in Florianópolis, Brazil.","authors":"Leandro Pereira Garcia, J. Traebert, A. Boing, Grazielli Faria Zimmer Santos, L. Pedebôs, E. d’Orsi, P. Prado, M. Veras, Giuliano Boava, A. F. Boing","doi":"10.1590/scielopreprints.993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo analyze the association between the transmission potential of SARS-CoV-2 and the decisions made by the municipal government of Florianópolis (Brazil) regarding social distancing.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe analyzed new cases of COVID-19 identified in Florianópolis residents between February 1 and July 14, 2020, using a nowcasting approach. Decrees related to COVID-19 published in the Official Gazette of the Municipality between February 1 and July 14, 2020 were also analyzed. Based on the actions proposed in the decrees, whether they loosened social distancing measures, or increased or maintained existing restrictions, was analyzed, thus creating a Social Distancing Index. Time-dependent reproduction numbers (Rt) for a period of 14 days prior to each decree were calculated. A matrix was constructed associating the classification of each decree and the Rt values, analyzing the consonance or dissonance between the potential dissemination of SARS-CoV-2 and the actions of the decrees.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 5,374 cases of COVID-19 and 26 decrees were analyzed. Nine decrees increased social distancing measures, nine maintained them, and eight loosened them. Of the 26 actions, 9 were consonant and 17 dissonant with the tendency indicated by the Rt. Dissonance was observed in all of the decrees that maintained the distance measures or loosened them. The fastest expansion in the number of new cases and the greatest amount of dissonant decrees was found in the last two months analyzed.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThere was an important divergence between municipal measures of social distancing with epidemiological indicators at the time of each political decision.","PeriodicalId":35426,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia","volume":"23 1","pages":"e200091"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/scielopreprints.993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To analyze the association between the transmission potential of SARS-CoV-2 and the decisions made by the municipal government of Florianópolis (Brazil) regarding social distancing. METHODS We analyzed new cases of COVID-19 identified in Florianópolis residents between February 1 and July 14, 2020, using a nowcasting approach. Decrees related to COVID-19 published in the Official Gazette of the Municipality between February 1 and July 14, 2020 were also analyzed. Based on the actions proposed in the decrees, whether they loosened social distancing measures, or increased or maintained existing restrictions, was analyzed, thus creating a Social Distancing Index. Time-dependent reproduction numbers (Rt) for a period of 14 days prior to each decree were calculated. A matrix was constructed associating the classification of each decree and the Rt values, analyzing the consonance or dissonance between the potential dissemination of SARS-CoV-2 and the actions of the decrees. RESULTS A total of 5,374 cases of COVID-19 and 26 decrees were analyzed. Nine decrees increased social distancing measures, nine maintained them, and eight loosened them. Of the 26 actions, 9 were consonant and 17 dissonant with the tendency indicated by the Rt. Dissonance was observed in all of the decrees that maintained the distance measures or loosened them. The fastest expansion in the number of new cases and the greatest amount of dissonant decrees was found in the last two months analyzed. CONCLUSION There was an important divergence between municipal measures of social distancing with epidemiological indicators at the time of each political decision.
Covid-19的潜在传播和政府决策:对巴西Florianópolis的回顾性分析
目的分析巴西Florianópolis市政府社会距离决策与SARS-CoV-2传播潜力的关系。方法采用临近预报法分析2020年2月1日至7月14日Florianópolis居民中发现的新发COVID-19病例。此外,还分析了2020年2月1日至7月14日在《市政府公报》上公布的与COVID-19相关的法令。根据这些法令中提出的措施,分析是放松了保持社会距离的措施,还是增加或维持了现有的限制措施,从而形成了“保持社会距离指数”。计算每个法令前14天的随时间变化的繁殖数(Rt)。构建将各法令分类与Rt值关联的矩阵,分析SARS-CoV-2潜在传播与法令行为之间的一致性或不一致性。结果共分析了5374例COVID-19病例和26例法令。9项法令增加了社会距离措施,9项法令维持了社会距离措施,8项法令放松了社会距离措施。在26个动作中,有9个动作与rt所指示的倾向一致,17个动作与rt所指示的倾向不一致。所有保持距离措施或放松距离措施的动作都存在不一致。分析结果显示,最近2个月新增案件增加最快,不和谐法令数量最多。结论每次政治决策时,市级保持社会距离措施与流行病学指标存在重要差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia (Brazilian Journal of Epidemiology) - every four months, journal published by the ABRASCO - aims at publishing not previously published Original Articles, including critical reviews on specific themes, which may contribute to the development of Epidemiology and related Sciences. Revista also publishes articles in the following categories: Debate aimed at discussing different views of the same theme which may be presented as an original article followed by comments from other authors, reproduction of panels and other similar formats; Notes and Information - notes on primary results of research studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信