{"title":"They are all lies. Even Mother Theresa did it for herself","authors":"J. Hattingh, M. Woermann","doi":"10.15249/3-1-70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we explore the question of what are we trying to achieve in teaching business ethics at undergraduate university level. The dominant normative model of business ethics suggests that the aim of business ethics (including the teaching of business ethics) is to move businesspeople from an egotistic position to an altruistic position. According to the latter position, the greater good of society is served by unselfish, other-regarding action, instead of by the narrow, self-centred interests of individuals or corporations acting on their own behalf (i.e. egoism). In this paper, the dominant model is analysed and criticised by means of subjecting it to the question of whether it is at all possible to move people from one position to another through teaching business ethics. A second, related aim of this analysis and critique deals with the question of whether ethics (as taking up moral responsibility for one’s actions) really entails a neat, linear model of change from position A to B. To arrive at a possible alternative model of teaching and “doing” business ethics, we explore some classic philosophical positions in which mixed signals are given regarding the status of egoism in ethics. This analysis will be applied to, and supported by, experience gained from teaching business ethics to accounting and management students at undergraduate level at the University of Stellenbosch.","PeriodicalId":42425,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Business Ethics","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Business Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15249/3-1-70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
In this paper we explore the question of what are we trying to achieve in teaching business ethics at undergraduate university level. The dominant normative model of business ethics suggests that the aim of business ethics (including the teaching of business ethics) is to move businesspeople from an egotistic position to an altruistic position. According to the latter position, the greater good of society is served by unselfish, other-regarding action, instead of by the narrow, self-centred interests of individuals or corporations acting on their own behalf (i.e. egoism). In this paper, the dominant model is analysed and criticised by means of subjecting it to the question of whether it is at all possible to move people from one position to another through teaching business ethics. A second, related aim of this analysis and critique deals with the question of whether ethics (as taking up moral responsibility for one’s actions) really entails a neat, linear model of change from position A to B. To arrive at a possible alternative model of teaching and “doing” business ethics, we explore some classic philosophical positions in which mixed signals are given regarding the status of egoism in ethics. This analysis will be applied to, and supported by, experience gained from teaching business ethics to accounting and management students at undergraduate level at the University of Stellenbosch.
本文探讨了在本科阶段的商业伦理教学中,我们要达到什么样的目标。占主导地位的商业伦理规范模型表明,商业伦理(包括商业伦理教学)的目的是将商人从自私的立场转变为利他的立场。根据后一种立场,社会的更大利益是由无私的、考虑他人的行为来服务的,而不是由狭隘的、以自我为中心的个人或公司的利益来代表他们自己(即利己主义)。在本文中,通过将其置于是否有可能通过教授商业道德将人们从一个职位转移到另一个职位的问题上,对占主导地位的模型进行了分析和批评。这个分析和批判的第二个相关目的是处理伦理(作为对自己的行为承担道德责任)是否真的需要一个从位置A到位置b变化的整洁的线性模型的问题。为了得出一个可能的教学和“做”商业伦理的替代模型,我们探索了一些经典的哲学立场,其中给出了关于利己主义在伦理中的地位的混合信号。这一分析将应用于斯泰伦博斯大学(University of Stellenbosch)本科阶段会计和管理专业学生的商业道德教学经验,并得到这些经验的支持。