An examination of the use of clinical trials as a source of information in scientific research

IF 0.5 4区 管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Bárbara Adriana Ferreira dos Santos Trigueiros, Andréa Rodrigues Ávila, Fabricia Pires Pimenta
{"title":"An examination of the use of clinical trials as a source of information in scientific research","authors":"Bárbara Adriana Ferreira dos Santos Trigueiros, Andréa Rodrigues Ávila, Fabricia Pires Pimenta","doi":"10.1590/2318-0889202234e210065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: As part of the innovation process, clinical research generates valuable data to assess technological solutions in healthcare, linking scientific research and knowledge transfer to provide beneficial innovations for society. However, the generated clinical data do not appear to be adequately available to the scientific community and society. The present study seeks to analyze the effectiveness of databases of clinical records as a source of relevant information for scientific research. We conducted a comparative analysis of 27 correlations of clinical trials between three different technologies and their scientific articles by consulting two information sources. Making connections between the data from these sources proved to be challenging. In addition, a considerable time lag (40 months on average) was observed between the end of the study and the publication of the results. Among the completed studies, 56% had not published their results in any of the channels studied. In addition to the paucity of reported results, the poor publication record of clinical trials is further evident in the lack of information on these studies in scientific publications. Thus, databases of clinical records are a potential source of information and may come to represent a central tool in the search for new technological solutions in healthcare.","PeriodicalId":44216,"journal":{"name":"Transinformacao","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transinformacao","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0889202234e210065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: As part of the innovation process, clinical research generates valuable data to assess technological solutions in healthcare, linking scientific research and knowledge transfer to provide beneficial innovations for society. However, the generated clinical data do not appear to be adequately available to the scientific community and society. The present study seeks to analyze the effectiveness of databases of clinical records as a source of relevant information for scientific research. We conducted a comparative analysis of 27 correlations of clinical trials between three different technologies and their scientific articles by consulting two information sources. Making connections between the data from these sources proved to be challenging. In addition, a considerable time lag (40 months on average) was observed between the end of the study and the publication of the results. Among the completed studies, 56% had not published their results in any of the channels studied. In addition to the paucity of reported results, the poor publication record of clinical trials is further evident in the lack of information on these studies in scientific publications. Thus, databases of clinical records are a potential source of information and may come to represent a central tool in the search for new technological solutions in healthcare.
在科学研究中使用临床试验作为信息来源的检查
摘要:作为创新过程的一部分,临床研究产生有价值的数据来评估医疗保健技术解决方案,将科学研究和知识转移联系起来,为社会提供有益的创新。然而,产生的临床数据似乎并没有充分提供给科学界和社会。本研究旨在分析临床记录数据库作为科学研究相关信息来源的有效性。我们通过查阅两个信息源,对三种不同技术的27项临床试验及其科学论文的相关性进行了比较分析。在这些来源的数据之间建立联系被证明是具有挑战性的。此外,在研究结束和结果发表之间观察到相当长的时间滞后(平均40个月)。在已完成的研究中,56%的研究结果没有在任何研究渠道上发表。除了缺乏报告的结果外,临床试验的不良发表记录进一步体现在科学出版物中缺乏这些研究的信息。因此,临床记录数据库是一种潜在的信息来源,并可能成为在医疗保健领域寻找新技术解决方案的核心工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transinformacao
Transinformacao INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
16
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Transinformação es una revista cuatrimestral especializada, abierta a las contribuciones de la comunidad científica nacional e internacional y editada por la Facultad de Biblioteconomía y el Centro de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales Aplicadas de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Campinas. Fundada en 1989, está clasificada en la lista Qualis como A1 y publica artículos que contribuyen al estudio y el desarrollo científico de las Ciencias de la Información, la Biblioteconomía, la Archivología, la Museología y sus áreas afines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信