Multidimensional geriatric assessment in primary care: a scoping review

Fernanda Matoso Siqueira, Cássia Evangelista Delgado, Fábio da Costa Carbogim, Edna Aparecida Barbosa de Castro, Regina Consolação dos Santos, R. Cavalcante
{"title":"Multidimensional geriatric assessment in primary care: a scoping review","authors":"Fernanda Matoso Siqueira, Cássia Evangelista Delgado, Fábio da Costa Carbogim, Edna Aparecida Barbosa de Castro, Regina Consolação dos Santos, R. Cavalcante","doi":"10.1590/1981-22562023026.230051.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective to map the publications on multidimensional geriatric assessment in the primary care setting. Method A scoping review using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology was carried out on the databases Web of Science, Scopus, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) and Literatura Latino Americana e do Caribe em Ciencias da Saude (LILACS). The studies addressed the population of older people aged ≥60 years, the concept of multidimensional assessment and the primary care setting. Results a total sample of 19 publications was included for qualitative analysis. The studies selected were of different designs (predominantly cross-sectional) and most were in English. The evaluation comprised three dimensions; instruments developed applicable to primary care; two types of information technologies used to support the evaluation; and the relevant findings about the practice. Conclusion this review identified tools that were based on several existing instruments. Strategies should be tailored for assessing older individuals in a quick feasible manner. Specific domains were commonly present in the instruments, considered important for providing a comprehensive assessment tailored for the older population.","PeriodicalId":31328,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562023026.230051.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objective to map the publications on multidimensional geriatric assessment in the primary care setting. Method A scoping review using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology was carried out on the databases Web of Science, Scopus, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) and Literatura Latino Americana e do Caribe em Ciencias da Saude (LILACS). The studies addressed the population of older people aged ≥60 years, the concept of multidimensional assessment and the primary care setting. Results a total sample of 19 publications was included for qualitative analysis. The studies selected were of different designs (predominantly cross-sectional) and most were in English. The evaluation comprised three dimensions; instruments developed applicable to primary care; two types of information technologies used to support the evaluation; and the relevant findings about the practice. Conclusion this review identified tools that were based on several existing instruments. Strategies should be tailored for assessing older individuals in a quick feasible manner. Specific domains were commonly present in the instruments, considered important for providing a comprehensive assessment tailored for the older population.
初级保健中的多维老年评估:范围审查
【摘要】目的对基层医疗机构多维老年评估的文献进行梳理。方法采用Joanna Briggs研究所的方法,对Web of Science、Scopus、Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE)和Literatura Latino Americana e do Caribe em Ciencias da Saude数据库(LILACS)进行范围综述。这些研究涉及年龄≥60岁的老年人,多维评估的概念和初级保健环境。结果共纳入19篇文献进行定性分析。所选的研究采用不同的设计(主要是横断面),大多数是英语研究。评价包括三个维度;开发适用于初级保健的工具;用于支持评价的两种信息技术;以及有关实践的相关发现。结论:本综述确定了基于几种现有工具的工具。应制定战略,以便以快速可行的方式对老年人进行评估。文书中通常有特定领域,被认为对提供适合老年人口的全面评估很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书