Vulnerability of institutionalized older people and social support in the perspective of the COVID-19 pandemic

A. A. Brito, J. Silva, Júlia Maria Fernandes Holanda, Ryssia Raynalle Magalhães Nogueira de Souza, Tamires Carneiro de Oliveira Mendes, K. Lima
{"title":"Vulnerability of institutionalized older people and social support in the perspective of the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"A. A. Brito, J. Silva, Júlia Maria Fernandes Holanda, Ryssia Raynalle Magalhães Nogueira de Souza, Tamires Carneiro de Oliveira Mendes, K. Lima","doi":"10.1590/1981-22562022025.220051.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective Discuss covid-19 prevention measures in the context of the vulnerability of institutionalized elderly people and analyze the social support offered to Long Stay Institutions for the Elderly during the pandemic. Method Qualitative research carried out with workers from 24 philanthropic institutions in Rio Grande do Norte. The concepts of vulnerability in health and social support supported the organization and discussion of data submitted to thematic analysis. Results The institutions partially adopted the prevention measures recommended by the National Health Surveillance Agency, in evidence: cancellation of visits, use of Personal Protective Equipment and cleaning of environments. For the most part, institutions prioritized the control of viral transmission, putting the reduction of socio-psychological impacts related to social distancing and isolation in the background. Measures not recommended and without scientific evidence were observed, such as the use of ivermectin. Also, the performance of social assistance and health networks was carried out in a more integrated way, improving the social support offered to institutions in the perspective of the pandemic. The Unified Health System stood out for its sanitary recommendations, supply of supplies and attention from the Family Health Strategy, while the Unified Social Assistance System acted in a less expressive way. Conclusion In general, the measures adopted were insufficient to prevent covid-19 in view of the susceptibilities of institutionalized elderly people. Although the pandemic has expanded the social support network and the visibility of Long-Stay Institutions for the Elderly, greater investments by the government are necessary to effectively reduce the vulnerability of these elderly people.","PeriodicalId":31328,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562022025.220051.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objective Discuss covid-19 prevention measures in the context of the vulnerability of institutionalized elderly people and analyze the social support offered to Long Stay Institutions for the Elderly during the pandemic. Method Qualitative research carried out with workers from 24 philanthropic institutions in Rio Grande do Norte. The concepts of vulnerability in health and social support supported the organization and discussion of data submitted to thematic analysis. Results The institutions partially adopted the prevention measures recommended by the National Health Surveillance Agency, in evidence: cancellation of visits, use of Personal Protective Equipment and cleaning of environments. For the most part, institutions prioritized the control of viral transmission, putting the reduction of socio-psychological impacts related to social distancing and isolation in the background. Measures not recommended and without scientific evidence were observed, such as the use of ivermectin. Also, the performance of social assistance and health networks was carried out in a more integrated way, improving the social support offered to institutions in the perspective of the pandemic. The Unified Health System stood out for its sanitary recommendations, supply of supplies and attention from the Family Health Strategy, while the Unified Social Assistance System acted in a less expressive way. Conclusion In general, the measures adopted were insufficient to prevent covid-19 in view of the susceptibilities of institutionalized elderly people. Although the pandemic has expanded the social support network and the visibility of Long-Stay Institutions for the Elderly, greater investments by the government are necessary to effectively reduce the vulnerability of these elderly people.
COVID-19大流行背景下机构老年人的脆弱性与社会支持
摘要目的探讨在机构老年人脆弱性背景下的新型冠状病毒肺炎预防措施,分析疫情期间长期养老机构的社会支持情况。方法对北部大德州24家慈善机构工作人员进行定性研究。保健和社会支助方面的脆弱性概念有助于组织和讨论提交给专题分析的数据。结果各机构部分采用了国家卫生监督局推荐的预防措施,如:取消就诊、使用个人防护装备和清洁环境。在大多数情况下,各机构优先考虑控制病毒传播,将减少与社交距离和隔离有关的社会心理影响放在次要位置。观察到不推荐和没有科学证据的措施,如使用伊维菌素。此外,社会援助和保健网络的运作更加一体化,从大流行病的角度改善了向各机构提供的社会支助。统一卫生系统因其卫生建议、用品供应和对家庭健康战略的关注而脱颖而出,而统一社会援助系统则表现得不那么富有表现力。结论总体而言,鉴于机构老年人的易感性,采取的措施不足以预防covid-19。虽然大流行病扩大了社会支持网络,提高了长期老年人机构的知名度,但政府需要加大投资,以有效减少这些老年人的脆弱性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书