YouTube as a source of information about pulmonary rehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 0.1 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
E. Özduran
{"title":"YouTube as a source of information about pulmonary rehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"E. Özduran","doi":"10.14744/ejp.2022.9221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND AIM: To our best knowledge, there is no literature on the effectiveness of YouTube on pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) practice. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the characteristics and medical aspects of videos on YouTube about PR. METHODS: In the internet media website YouTube.com search engine, the Word PR was searched on August 3, 2021, without any filter. The first 100 videos listed were classified according to the number of likes, dislikes, origin of country, and content of PR. The materials were evaluated in terms of intelligibility using the suitability assessment of materials (SAM). User participation measurements were obtained for each video. RESULTS: The later years were shown to have a statistically significant relationship with respiratory techniques, PR contraindications, and videos with PR in COVID in our study (p<0.05). However, no significant relationship was identified between the later years and smoking in PR and videos with PR in the intensive care unit (p>0.05). The total SAM score was found to significantly correlate with the number of views, likes, dislikes, comments, and video durations (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It was observed that COVID videos with PR content were uploaded with regard to the specific video issues and treatment needs during and after the COVID infection in the later years, especially after the pandemic. Moreover, videos with high comprehensibility are more interesting for users, reflected in views, likes, dislikes, comments, and video duration. Higher quality videos created by health professionals will be more useful for patient education in the future.","PeriodicalId":42933,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/ejp.2022.9221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To our best knowledge, there is no literature on the effectiveness of YouTube on pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) practice. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the characteristics and medical aspects of videos on YouTube about PR. METHODS: In the internet media website YouTube.com search engine, the Word PR was searched on August 3, 2021, without any filter. The first 100 videos listed were classified according to the number of likes, dislikes, origin of country, and content of PR. The materials were evaluated in terms of intelligibility using the suitability assessment of materials (SAM). User participation measurements were obtained for each video. RESULTS: The later years were shown to have a statistically significant relationship with respiratory techniques, PR contraindications, and videos with PR in COVID in our study (p<0.05). However, no significant relationship was identified between the later years and smoking in PR and videos with PR in the intensive care unit (p>0.05). The total SAM score was found to significantly correlate with the number of views, likes, dislikes, comments, and video durations (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It was observed that COVID videos with PR content were uploaded with regard to the specific video issues and treatment needs during and after the COVID infection in the later years, especially after the pandemic. Moreover, videos with high comprehensibility are more interesting for users, reflected in views, likes, dislikes, comments, and video duration. Higher quality videos created by health professionals will be more useful for patient education in the future.
YouTube是COVID-19大流行期间有关肺部康复的信息来源
背景和目的:据我们所知,尚无关于YouTube在肺康复(PR)实践中的有效性的文献。在我们的研究中,我们旨在评估YouTube上关于PR的视频的特征和医学方面。方法:在互联网媒体网站YouTube.com搜索引擎中,于2021年8月3日不加任何过滤地搜索Word PR。根据喜欢,不喜欢,国家来源和PR内容的数量对列出的前100个视频进行分类。使用材料适用性评估(SAM)对材料的可理解性进行评估。对每个视频进行用户参与测量。结果:在我们的研究中,后期年龄与呼吸技术、PR禁忌症、PR视频有统计学意义(p0.05)。SAM总分与观看次数、喜欢次数、不喜欢次数、评论次数和视频时长显著相关(p<0.05)。结论:观察到在后期,特别是大流行后,针对COVID感染期间和之后的具体视频问题和治疗需求,上传了带有PR内容的COVID视频。此外,高可理解性的视频对用户来说更有趣,这体现在观看次数、喜欢、不喜欢、评论和视频时长上。由卫生专业人员制作的高质量视频将在未来对患者教育更有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology
Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信