THE BRAZILIAN DEINDUSTRIALIZATION THESIS REVISITED: A SUBSYSTEM APPROACH, 2000-2015

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Revista de Economia Contemporanea Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/198055272617

Henrique Morrone, Adilson Giovanini, Duílio de Avila Berni

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article investigates the structural transformation of sectors and subsystems in Brazil during the 2000-2015 period, applying Momigliano and Siniscalco’s approach. We employed the official Brazilian input-output tables from 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2015 to evaluate employment, value-added, and profits of six economic activities. Looking at sectors and subsystems, we can better understand the structural change and its connection with domestic outsourcing, particularly in manufacturing. Our ﬁndings underscored a weaker process of manufacturing decline when we take the subsystem approach. The rising integration of market services into the manufacturing sector explains, at least partially, the smaller manufacturing decline in terms of value-added and profit participation in the overall economy.

查看原文本刊更多论文

巴西去工业化论文重访:一个子系统方法，2000-2015

本文运用Momigliano和Siniscalco的方法，对2000-2015年期间巴西各部门和子系统的结构转型进行了研究。我们采用2000年、2005年、2010年和2015年的巴西官方投入产出表来评估六项经济活动的就业、增值和利润。观察部门和子系统，我们可以更好地理解结构变化及其与国内外包的联系，特别是在制造业。我们的研究结果强调，当我们采用子系统方法时，制造业衰退的过程较弱。市场服务日益融入制造业，至少部分解释了制造业在整体经济中附加值和利润参与方面下降幅度较小的原因。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Revista de Economia Contemporanea Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

22 weeks

期刊介绍： Revista de Economia Contemporânea to publish original contributions in Economic Theory, Applied Economy, Economic History, History of Economic Thought, Economic Methodology and other pertinent economic matters. Abstract: Brief abstract - The Revista de Economia Contemporânea (REC) began publication in the second half of 1997 in the Economy Institute of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Its articles strive to contribute to the academic debate among the various areas of interest in economics. On account of its self-criticism and debating tradition, the magazine wishes to be plural and open to dialogue with the present-day different theoretical tendencies in the expanding doctrine of economics.