Evaluation study of the improvement of the quality of death information in hospitals of the states of Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo, Brazil, 2017.

Q2 Medicine
C. M. Minto, A. M. Cascão, Sheylla Lima, F. G. Kuyumjian, Luciana Godoy, M. F. M. Souza
{"title":"Evaluation study of the improvement of the quality of death information in hospitals of the states of Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo, Brazil, 2017.","authors":"C. M. Minto, A. M. Cascão, Sheylla Lima, F. G. Kuyumjian, Luciana Godoy, M. F. M. Souza","doi":"10.1590/1980-549720190008.supl.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nDeaths classified as Garbage Cause (GC) are considered to be of little use in triggering public health prevention actions.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nEvaluate the impact of hospital research on recovering the true root cause of death.\n\n\nMETHODOLOGY\nDescriptive study on the investigation of deaths with root causes classified as garbage code in ten selected hospitals with the highest number of this cause of death in the states of Rio de Janeiro (RJ) and São Paulo (SP), Brazil, in 2017. The investigation considered the patient's medical record, which contains the information collected by hospital surveillance professionals in a standardized form.\n\n\nRESULTS\n2,579 deaths with a GC and 2,116 with GC priorities. The highest proportion occurred in the 70-year-old or older group with differences in the predominant causes as a function of the life cycle. The GC reclassification was 41.9% and 93.6% of deaths investigated in RJ and SP, respectively. Deaths which had altered causes and remained as garbage code were analyzed for change in severity level, which take into account the potential impact of GC in the mortality profile. Thus, 70.7% and 73.6% of GC deaths with very high and with high level, respectively, were reclassified to lower levels. Among the garbage codes that went to well-defined causes, the ICD-10 External Causes chapter was the one that rendered the highest number of deaths.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe investigation allowed to qualify causes of death and demonstrated the need for professional training on the definition of the root cause of death.","PeriodicalId":35426,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia","volume":"22Suppl 3 Suppl 3 1","pages":"e19008.supl.3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720190008.supl.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Deaths classified as Garbage Cause (GC) are considered to be of little use in triggering public health prevention actions. OBJECTIVE Evaluate the impact of hospital research on recovering the true root cause of death. METHODOLOGY Descriptive study on the investigation of deaths with root causes classified as garbage code in ten selected hospitals with the highest number of this cause of death in the states of Rio de Janeiro (RJ) and São Paulo (SP), Brazil, in 2017. The investigation considered the patient's medical record, which contains the information collected by hospital surveillance professionals in a standardized form. RESULTS 2,579 deaths with a GC and 2,116 with GC priorities. The highest proportion occurred in the 70-year-old or older group with differences in the predominant causes as a function of the life cycle. The GC reclassification was 41.9% and 93.6% of deaths investigated in RJ and SP, respectively. Deaths which had altered causes and remained as garbage code were analyzed for change in severity level, which take into account the potential impact of GC in the mortality profile. Thus, 70.7% and 73.6% of GC deaths with very high and with high level, respectively, were reclassified to lower levels. Among the garbage codes that went to well-defined causes, the ICD-10 External Causes chapter was the one that rendered the highest number of deaths. CONCLUSION The investigation allowed to qualify causes of death and demonstrated the need for professional training on the definition of the root cause of death.
巴西巴西里约热内卢州和圣保罗州医院死亡信息质量改善的评价研究,2017。
分类为垃圾原因(GC)的死亡被认为在触发公共卫生预防行动方面用处不大。目的评价医院研究对查明真正的死亡根本原因的影响。方法对2017年巴西巴西里约热内卢州(RJ)和圣保罗州(SP) 10家医院垃圾死因分类最高的根本原因死亡调查进行描述性研究。调查考虑了患者的医疗记录,其中包含医院监测专业人员以标准化形式收集的信息。结果:2579例GC死亡,2116例GC优先级死亡。最高的比例发生在70岁或以上的群体,主要原因作为生命周期的函数存在差异。在RJ和SP中,GC再分类率分别为41.9%和93.6%。对改变了原因并保留为垃圾代码的死亡进行了分析,以确定严重级别的变化,这考虑了死亡率概况中GC的潜在影响。因此,非常高和高水平的GC死亡分别为70.7%和73.6%被重新分类为较低水平。在定义明确的原因的垃圾代码中,ICD-10外部原因章节是导致死亡人数最多的一个。结论通过调查确定了死亡原因,并表明需要对死亡根本原因的定义进行专业培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia (Brazilian Journal of Epidemiology) - every four months, journal published by the ABRASCO - aims at publishing not previously published Original Articles, including critical reviews on specific themes, which may contribute to the development of Epidemiology and related Sciences. Revista also publishes articles in the following categories: Debate aimed at discussing different views of the same theme which may be presented as an original article followed by comments from other authors, reproduction of panels and other similar formats; Notes and Information - notes on primary results of research studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信