Evaluation of a smartphone application to improve medical certification of the cause of death.

Q2 Medicine
Lenice Harumi Ishitani, C. D. Cunha, R. Ladeira, P. Corrêa, Mayara Rocha dos Santos, Maria Albertina Santiago Rego, Dácio de Lyra Rabello Neto, Mauro Taniguchi, Cristiano Lehrer, Lucia Maria Miana Mattos Paixão, Ashley Frederes, M. F. D. Souza, E. França
{"title":"Evaluation of a smartphone application to improve medical certification of the cause of death.","authors":"Lenice Harumi Ishitani, C. D. Cunha, R. Ladeira, P. Corrêa, Mayara Rocha dos Santos, Maria Albertina Santiago Rego, Dácio de Lyra Rabello Neto, Mauro Taniguchi, Cristiano Lehrer, Lucia Maria Miana Mattos Paixão, Ashley Frederes, M. F. D. Souza, E. França","doi":"10.1590/1980-549720190014.supl.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nA smartphone application named AtestaDO was developed to support physicians with medical certification of the cause of death. The objective of this study is to evaluate the acceptability of the app.\n\n\nMETHODS\nPhysicians were invited to attend meetings on the proper certification of cause of death, and to evaluate the application in a national workshop in Natal (first stage) and in two large hospitals in Belo Horizonte (second and third stages).\n\n\nRESULTS\nIn Natal, 82% of 38 physicians had more than 20 years of experience and in Belo Horizonte, more than 67% of 58 physicians had less than 5 years of experience. The sections \"Application interface\", \"How to certify the causes of death\", \"Practice with exercises\" and \"Other information for physicians\" were positively evaluated by more than 50% of physicians in Belo Horizonte. In Natal, all sections were positively evaluated by at least 80% of participants. More than 70% of the participants in both Natal and the second stage of Belo Horizonte indicated they would possibly use AtestaDO to guide filling of a death certificate. The probability of using AtestaDO to teach classes on filling death certificates was 83.3% for Natal's physicians but less than 60% in Belo Horizonte. In the three stages, most physicians would recommend using the application to other colleagues.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe evaluation of AtestaDO showed good acceptability. We expect that the use of this tool enables improvements in medical certification of causes of death.","PeriodicalId":35426,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia","volume":"5 1","pages":"e190014.supl.3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720190014.supl.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

INTRODUCTION A smartphone application named AtestaDO was developed to support physicians with medical certification of the cause of death. The objective of this study is to evaluate the acceptability of the app. METHODS Physicians were invited to attend meetings on the proper certification of cause of death, and to evaluate the application in a national workshop in Natal (first stage) and in two large hospitals in Belo Horizonte (second and third stages). RESULTS In Natal, 82% of 38 physicians had more than 20 years of experience and in Belo Horizonte, more than 67% of 58 physicians had less than 5 years of experience. The sections "Application interface", "How to certify the causes of death", "Practice with exercises" and "Other information for physicians" were positively evaluated by more than 50% of physicians in Belo Horizonte. In Natal, all sections were positively evaluated by at least 80% of participants. More than 70% of the participants in both Natal and the second stage of Belo Horizonte indicated they would possibly use AtestaDO to guide filling of a death certificate. The probability of using AtestaDO to teach classes on filling death certificates was 83.3% for Natal's physicians but less than 60% in Belo Horizonte. In the three stages, most physicians would recommend using the application to other colleagues. CONCLUSION The evaluation of AtestaDO showed good acceptability. We expect that the use of this tool enables improvements in medical certification of causes of death.
评估智能手机应用程序,以提高死因的医疗证明。
一款名为AtestaDO的智能手机应用程序被开发出来,以支持医生对死因进行医学证明。本研究的目的是评估应用程序的可接受性。方法邀请医生参加关于正确证明死因的会议,并在纳塔尔的一个国家研讨会(第一阶段)和贝洛奥里桑特的两家大医院(第二和第三阶段)对应用程序进行评估。结果纳塔尔市38名医生中有82%具有20年以上工作经验,贝洛奥里藏特市58名医生中有67%具有5年以下工作经验。贝洛奥里藏特超过50%的医生对“应用界面”、“如何证明死因”、“练习练习”和“医生的其他信息”等部分给予了积极评价。在纳塔尔,至少80%的参与者对所有部分都给予了积极评价。纳塔尔和贝洛奥里藏特第二阶段超过70%的参与者表示,他们可能会使用AtestaDO来指导填写死亡证明。纳塔尔的医生使用AtestaDO教授填写死亡证明课程的概率为83.3%,而贝洛奥里藏特的概率不到60%。在这三个阶段中,大多数医生会向其他同事推荐使用该应用程序。结论评价AtestaDO具有良好的可接受性。我们期望使用这一工具能够改进死因的医学证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia (Brazilian Journal of Epidemiology) - every four months, journal published by the ABRASCO - aims at publishing not previously published Original Articles, including critical reviews on specific themes, which may contribute to the development of Epidemiology and related Sciences. Revista also publishes articles in the following categories: Debate aimed at discussing different views of the same theme which may be presented as an original article followed by comments from other authors, reproduction of panels and other similar formats; Notes and Information - notes on primary results of research studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信