Migration in and out of Southeastern Europe. Values, Networks, Wellbeing

IF 1 Q1 Arts and Humanities
J. Jerger, Michael Knogler
{"title":"Migration in and out of Southeastern Europe. Values, Networks, Wellbeing","authors":"J. Jerger, Michael Knogler","doi":"10.1515/soeu-2016-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In July 2015 the Institute for East and Southeast European Studies—the home of this journal—hosted its 3rd Annual Conference. The title of the event was ‘Migration in and out of East and Southeastern Europe. Values, Networks, Well-Being’ and it brought together researchers from the social sciences and the humanities, who together clearly demonstrated how much value multiand interdisciplinary approaches add to the study of migration. As befi ts this journal, the contributions to that conference inspired us to assemble migration research focused on Southeastern Europe which looks at present or, rather, recent developments. Three of the fi ve papers in this special issue of Südosteuropa were presented and discussed during that July 2015 conference, while the other two papers, respectively by Nermin Oruč and Amina Tabaković and by Ana Aceska, were specially commissioned for this issue. Whereas the bulk of the scientifi c literature on the topic concentrates on the eff ects of migration within the society immigrated to, both the conference and the papers in this volume look too at the situation in countries emigrated from; in a way the phenomenon of return migration combines both elements along the time axis. Return migration is the topic of the fi rst paper, by Selma Porobić on ‘Bosnian “Returnee Voices” Communicating Experiences of Successful Reintegration. The Social Capital and Sustainable Return Nexus in Bosnia and Herzegovina.’ Porobić conducted illuminating interviews with returned migrants in three municipalities that experienced an enormous amount of war-displacement during the 1990s and substantial subsequent return migration. Clearly, ethnic confl icts in the region are still a major challenge requiring ‘social bridging’ eff orts between groups as well as ‘social bonding’ within homogenous groups. A third dimension, ‘social linking’, looks at the relationship between individuals or groups and state institutions. Porobić critically assesses the roles both of external help by humanitarian organisations such as the UNHCR, and the local and regional organisation of people—what she calls ‘grass-roots acSüdosteuropa 64 (2016), no. 1, pp. 1-4","PeriodicalId":51954,"journal":{"name":"Sudosteuropa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/soeu-2016-0001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sudosteuropa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/soeu-2016-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In July 2015 the Institute for East and Southeast European Studies—the home of this journal—hosted its 3rd Annual Conference. The title of the event was ‘Migration in and out of East and Southeastern Europe. Values, Networks, Well-Being’ and it brought together researchers from the social sciences and the humanities, who together clearly demonstrated how much value multiand interdisciplinary approaches add to the study of migration. As befi ts this journal, the contributions to that conference inspired us to assemble migration research focused on Southeastern Europe which looks at present or, rather, recent developments. Three of the fi ve papers in this special issue of Südosteuropa were presented and discussed during that July 2015 conference, while the other two papers, respectively by Nermin Oruč and Amina Tabaković and by Ana Aceska, were specially commissioned for this issue. Whereas the bulk of the scientifi c literature on the topic concentrates on the eff ects of migration within the society immigrated to, both the conference and the papers in this volume look too at the situation in countries emigrated from; in a way the phenomenon of return migration combines both elements along the time axis. Return migration is the topic of the fi rst paper, by Selma Porobić on ‘Bosnian “Returnee Voices” Communicating Experiences of Successful Reintegration. The Social Capital and Sustainable Return Nexus in Bosnia and Herzegovina.’ Porobić conducted illuminating interviews with returned migrants in three municipalities that experienced an enormous amount of war-displacement during the 1990s and substantial subsequent return migration. Clearly, ethnic confl icts in the region are still a major challenge requiring ‘social bridging’ eff orts between groups as well as ‘social bonding’ within homogenous groups. A third dimension, ‘social linking’, looks at the relationship between individuals or groups and state institutions. Porobić critically assesses the roles both of external help by humanitarian organisations such as the UNHCR, and the local and regional organisation of people—what she calls ‘grass-roots acSüdosteuropa 64 (2016), no. 1, pp. 1-4
进出东南欧的移民。价值观,网络,幸福
2015年7月,本刊所在的东南欧研究所主办了第三届年会。这次活动的标题是“东欧和东南欧的移民”。价值观,网络,福祉”,它汇集了社会科学和人文科学的研究人员,他们一起清楚地展示了多学科和跨学科的方法对移民研究的价值。为了使本刊受益,对那次会议的贡献激励我们汇集了集中在东南欧的移民研究,这些研究着眼于当前或更确切地说是最近的发展。在2015年7月的会议上,《星报》特刊上的五篇论文中有三篇是在会议上发表和讨论的,而另外两篇论文,分别由Nermin oruski和Amina tabakoviki以及Ana Aceska撰写,是专门为这期杂志撰写的。尽管关于该主题的大部分科学文献都集中在移民对移民社会的影响上,但会议和本卷中的论文也关注移民来源国的情况;在某种程度上,回迁现象沿着时间轴结合了这两个因素。第一篇论文的主题是回乡移民,作者是Selma porobiki,题目是“波黑“回乡者之声”传达成功重返社会的经验。波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的社会资本和可持续回报关系。波罗比奇在三个城市对返回的移民进行了富有启发性的采访,这些城市在20世纪90年代经历了大量的战争流离失所,随后又有大量的移民返回。显然,该地区的种族冲突仍然是一个重大挑战,需要群体之间的“社会桥梁”努力以及同质群体内部的“社会纽带”。第三个维度,“社会联系”,着眼于个人或群体与国家机构之间的关系。波罗比奇批判性地评估了联合国难民事务高级专员办事处等人道主义组织的外部帮助以及当地和区域人民组织的作用-她称之为“基层acsass”(dosteuropa 64 (2016), no。1,第1-4页
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sudosteuropa
Sudosteuropa AREA STUDIES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信