Ruana Carolina Cabral da Silva, José Jailson Lima Bezerra, Maria Franco Trindade Medeiros
{"title":"Analysis of historical botanical reports of species of Fabaceae in Historia Naturalis Brasiliae (1648)","authors":"Ruana Carolina Cabral da Silva, José Jailson Lima Bezerra, Maria Franco Trindade Medeiros","doi":"10.1590/2175-7860202273061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Historia Naturalis Brasiliae, a reference work for Brazilian natural sciences, contains information on species observed by 17th century naturalists. Among the reports, the botanical family Fabaceae deserves to be highlighted among the taxa that make up the Brazilian flora due to its richness of species and economic interest. In this sense, the objective of the present study was to retrieve information regarding Fabaceae cited in Historia Naturalis Brasiliae by naturalists Piso & Marggraf (1648), with the aim of identifying potential resources of Brazilian flora in conjunction with local knowledge about potential species today and how historical changes have influenced the use of these plant resources. Documentary data were analyzed in the original source and in Pickel’s 2008 review work (Flora do Nordeste do Brasil). The information was organized in a database and analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. The analysis recovered 49 species belonging to the botanical family Fabaceae in the work. Of this total, 33 species and two genera had their use mentioned in the work, the reports of which were subdivided into four categories, with the highest percentage being for the category of medicinal use (69.23%). Of the plants reported for medicinal use, 18 species and one genus had no records in contemporary works. The analyses presented here contribute to expanding the knowledge of Fabaceae, the recovery of knowledge of plants from past centuries, and the discussion of the influence of factors that cause historical changes in use patterns, thus enriching studies in the field of botany, particularly historical ethnobotany.","PeriodicalId":38672,"journal":{"name":"Rodriguesia","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rodriguesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-7860202273061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Historia Naturalis Brasiliae, a reference work for Brazilian natural sciences, contains information on species observed by 17th century naturalists. Among the reports, the botanical family Fabaceae deserves to be highlighted among the taxa that make up the Brazilian flora due to its richness of species and economic interest. In this sense, the objective of the present study was to retrieve information regarding Fabaceae cited in Historia Naturalis Brasiliae by naturalists Piso & Marggraf (1648), with the aim of identifying potential resources of Brazilian flora in conjunction with local knowledge about potential species today and how historical changes have influenced the use of these plant resources. Documentary data were analyzed in the original source and in Pickel’s 2008 review work (Flora do Nordeste do Brasil). The information was organized in a database and analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. The analysis recovered 49 species belonging to the botanical family Fabaceae in the work. Of this total, 33 species and two genera had their use mentioned in the work, the reports of which were subdivided into four categories, with the highest percentage being for the category of medicinal use (69.23%). Of the plants reported for medicinal use, 18 species and one genus had no records in contemporary works. The analyses presented here contribute to expanding the knowledge of Fabaceae, the recovery of knowledge of plants from past centuries, and the discussion of the influence of factors that cause historical changes in use patterns, thus enriching studies in the field of botany, particularly historical ethnobotany.
摘要巴西自然科学参考书《巴西自然历史》收录了17世纪博物学家观察到的物种信息。在这些报告中,植物科Fabaceae因其丰富的物种和经济价值而值得在构成巴西植物群的分类群中突出。从这个意义上说,本研究的目的是检索博物学家Piso和Marggraf(1648)在《巴西自然史》中引用的关于Fabaceae的信息,目的是结合当地对当今潜在物种的了解,确定巴西植物群的潜在资源,以及历史变化如何影响这些植物资源的利用。在原始来源和Pickel 2008年的评论工作(Flora do Nordeste do Brasil)中分析了文献数据。这些信息被组织在一个数据库中,并进行定性和定量分析。结果表明,本研究共回收植物科豆科植物49种。其中33种2属有文献提及其用途,又分为4类,其中药用类所占比例最高(69.23%)。其中药用植物18种,1属在当代文献中未见记载。本文的分析有助于扩大对豆科植物的认识,恢复过去几个世纪以来对植物的认识,并讨论导致利用模式历史变化的因素的影响,从而丰富植物学领域的研究,特别是历史民族植物学的研究。