Evaluation of dog tooth enamel by scanning electron microscopy after different types of polishing

Q4 Veterinary
Nelcimara Mirley de Souza Correia, Vitor Eduardo Arantes de Barros, Emmanuel Arnhold, M. Fioravanti, Raquel Cunha Carneiro, Patricia Lorena da Silva Neves Guimarães
{"title":"Evaluation of dog tooth enamel by scanning electron microscopy after different types of polishing","authors":"Nelcimara Mirley de Souza Correia, Vitor Eduardo Arantes de Barros, Emmanuel Arnhold, M. Fioravanti, Raquel Cunha Carneiro, Patricia Lorena da Silva Neves Guimarães","doi":"10.1590/1809-6891v24e-74619e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Polishing is an important procedure which takes part in the periodontal disease treatment, being commonly performed with the help of prophylactic paste and provides smoothing of the tooth surface, hindering the adhesion of new plaque. With this study we aimed to evaluate by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the effects of dental polishing observing, qualitatively, the effectiveness and the damage, in three distinct treatments after calculus removal. Twenty (20) teeth were used (four of each dog), from which were obtained three samples each. The sixty samples were distributed into three groups (G0= tooth segmentation submitted to prophylaxis without polishing; G1= vestibular surface prophylaxis followed by polishing with the use of Defengy OC® and G2= vestibular surface prophylaxis followed by polishing with the use of pumice and fluorine gel). The samples were prepared and sent to images execution via SEM. These images, with enlargement of 100x and 500x, were evaluated and the classification averages were obtained. The statistical analysis of these averages was made through the Friedman nonparametric test using the software R. Statistical differences were observed (P<0,05) between groups 0 and 1 in the 100x magnification, whereas in the 500x magnification there was no difference (P>0,05) between the groups. The evaluation based on SEM images at two magnifications was essential, as it allowed the visualization of grooves and remaining calculi in a comprehensive way at 100x magnification and in more detail at 500x.","PeriodicalId":38520,"journal":{"name":"Ciencia Animal Brasileira","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciencia Animal Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-6891v24e-74619e","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Polishing is an important procedure which takes part in the periodontal disease treatment, being commonly performed with the help of prophylactic paste and provides smoothing of the tooth surface, hindering the adhesion of new plaque. With this study we aimed to evaluate by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the effects of dental polishing observing, qualitatively, the effectiveness and the damage, in three distinct treatments after calculus removal. Twenty (20) teeth were used (four of each dog), from which were obtained three samples each. The sixty samples were distributed into three groups (G0= tooth segmentation submitted to prophylaxis without polishing; G1= vestibular surface prophylaxis followed by polishing with the use of Defengy OC® and G2= vestibular surface prophylaxis followed by polishing with the use of pumice and fluorine gel). The samples were prepared and sent to images execution via SEM. These images, with enlargement of 100x and 500x, were evaluated and the classification averages were obtained. The statistical analysis of these averages was made through the Friedman nonparametric test using the software R. Statistical differences were observed (P<0,05) between groups 0 and 1 in the 100x magnification, whereas in the 500x magnification there was no difference (P>0,05) between the groups. The evaluation based on SEM images at two magnifications was essential, as it allowed the visualization of grooves and remaining calculi in a comprehensive way at 100x magnification and in more detail at 500x.
不同抛光方式对犬牙釉质的扫描电镜评价
抛光是牙周病治疗中的一项重要步骤,通常在预防膏体的帮助下进行,以使牙齿表面光滑,阻止新菌斑的粘附。本研究旨在通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM),定性地观察牙抛光在除牙石后三种不同治疗方法中的效果和损伤。使用了二十(20)颗牙齿(每只狗4颗),每只狗从中获得3个样本。60份样本分为三组(G0=牙段进行预防,不抛光;G1=前庭表面预防,然后使用Defengy OC®进行抛光;G2=前庭表面预防,然后使用浮石和氟凝胶进行抛光)。样品被制备并通过扫描电镜发送到图像执行。分别对放大100倍和500倍的图像进行评价,得到分类平均值。使用r软件进行Friedman非参数检验,对这些平均值进行统计分析,组间差异有统计学意义(P0,05)。基于两倍放大的SEM图像的评估是必不可少的,因为它允许在100倍放大和500倍放大下更详细地可视化沟槽和剩余结石。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ciencia Animal Brasileira
Ciencia Animal Brasileira Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信