Impact of different search strategies on the results of a meta-analysis for mastitis in dairy cattle

Q4 Veterinary
Danilo Pereira da Silva, G. V. Polycarpo, Fraine Natacha Aléssio, Alexandre de Queiroz, S. A. Maestá, R. Fonseca
{"title":"Impact of different search strategies on the results of a meta-analysis for mastitis in dairy cattle","authors":"Danilo Pereira da Silva, G. V. Polycarpo, Fraine Natacha Aléssio, Alexandre de Queiroz, S. A. Maestá, R. Fonseca","doi":"10.1590/1809-6891v24e-73159e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Poorly formulated search strategies can have great influences on the results of a meta-analysis, since it directly impacts the amount and adherence to the theme of the works used for study, therefore, the formulation of a consistent and functional search strategy is essential for the review system to achieve its goals. The objective of this work was to study the impact of different search strategies in a systematic review by performing a meta-analysis to estimate heritability for the mastitis trait in dairy cattle. Once the search strategies were defined, the searches carried out in the Web of science, Scopus, Scielo and Pubmed databases returned 921 studies from which, after going through the identification, selection, eligibility and inclusion processes, 25 studies were selected. Withdrawals from selected articles, 26 heritability estimates were used in the meta-analysis. A random effect model was used, with all analyzes performed by the R program, through the Metafor package. The estimates obtained through the combined statistics of studies for mastitis, presented values of low magnitude (0.05 and 0.06). The effects of search strategies have a significant impact on the meta-analysis estimates produced.","PeriodicalId":38520,"journal":{"name":"Ciencia Animal Brasileira","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciencia Animal Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-6891v24e-73159e","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Poorly formulated search strategies can have great influences on the results of a meta-analysis, since it directly impacts the amount and adherence to the theme of the works used for study, therefore, the formulation of a consistent and functional search strategy is essential for the review system to achieve its goals. The objective of this work was to study the impact of different search strategies in a systematic review by performing a meta-analysis to estimate heritability for the mastitis trait in dairy cattle. Once the search strategies were defined, the searches carried out in the Web of science, Scopus, Scielo and Pubmed databases returned 921 studies from which, after going through the identification, selection, eligibility and inclusion processes, 25 studies were selected. Withdrawals from selected articles, 26 heritability estimates were used in the meta-analysis. A random effect model was used, with all analyzes performed by the R program, through the Metafor package. The estimates obtained through the combined statistics of studies for mastitis, presented values of low magnitude (0.05 and 0.06). The effects of search strategies have a significant impact on the meta-analysis estimates produced.
不同搜索策略对奶牛乳腺炎荟萃分析结果的影响
不合理的检索策略会对meta分析的结果产生很大的影响,因为它直接影响到用于研究的作品的数量和对主题的坚持,因此,制定一致和功能性的检索策略对于评审系统实现其目标至关重要。这项工作的目的是通过进行荟萃分析来估计奶牛乳腺炎性状的遗传力,研究不同搜索策略在系统评价中的影响。一旦确定了搜索策略,在Web of science、Scopus、Scielo和Pubmed数据库中进行的搜索返回921项研究,其中经过识别、选择、资格和纳入过程,选择了25项研究。从选定的文章中提取,在荟萃分析中使用了26个遗传力估计。采用随机效应模型,所有分析均由R程序通过Metafor软件包完成。通过对乳腺炎研究的综合统计得出的估计值为低数量级(0.05和0.06)。搜索策略的效果对产生的元分析估计有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ciencia Animal Brasileira
Ciencia Animal Brasileira Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信