Closure of defects in a geometric figure pattern associated with tumescent anesthesia with lidocaine in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus)

Q4 Veterinary
Eduardo Luís Serafim, J. M. Pazzini, Michelle do Carmo Pereira Rocha, Laís Calazans Menescal Linhares, A. B. Nardi, Maria de Fátima Moutinho Gartner, I. Amorim, A. Rêma, F. Faria, R. Uscategui, V. T. Almeida, Carlos Alfredo Calpaa, S. Calazans
{"title":"Closure of defects in a geometric figure pattern associated with tumescent anesthesia with lidocaine in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus)","authors":"Eduardo Luís Serafim, J. M. Pazzini, Michelle do Carmo Pereira Rocha, Laís Calazans Menescal Linhares, A. B. Nardi, Maria de Fátima Moutinho Gartner, I. Amorim, A. Rêma, F. Faria, R. Uscategui, V. T. Almeida, Carlos Alfredo Calpaa, S. Calazans","doi":"10.1590/1809-6891v22e-7072e-70728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The use of tumescent anesthesia with lidocaine can provide better intra- and postoperative analgesia that would benefit extensive reconstructive surgery. However, lidocaine can interfere with the healing process. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the local interference of the healing of induced and closed skin defects in a geometric pattern associated with the use of tumescent anesthesia with lidocaine in rabbits. Furthermore, we assessed its influence on cardiorespiratory parameters and postoperative analgesia. This study included 27 rabbits divided into three groups: GC (without the use of tumescence), GS (use of tumescence with 0.9% NaCl solution), and GL (use of tumescent anesthesia with lidocaine). There was no statistically significant intergroup difference in any stage of the wound healing process on macroscopic evaluations, in the angiogenesis process, or in the process of collagenization and fibroblast deposition. There were significant differences in heart rate (lower in GL), respiratory rate (higher in GC), mean arterial pressure (higher in GL), and expired concentration of isoflurane (lower in GL). There was no significant intergroup difference in the von Frey filament test or the visual analog scale score used to evaluate postoperative analgesia. We concluded that tumescent anesthesia with lidocaine does not impair postoperative tissue repair. Its use features benefits such as reducing the volume of inhaled anesthetic, maintaining the anesthesia plan, stable heart and respiratory rates, and lower hypotension during the surgical procedure.","PeriodicalId":38520,"journal":{"name":"Ciencia Animal Brasileira","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciencia Animal Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-6891v22e-7072e-70728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The use of tumescent anesthesia with lidocaine can provide better intra- and postoperative analgesia that would benefit extensive reconstructive surgery. However, lidocaine can interfere with the healing process. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the local interference of the healing of induced and closed skin defects in a geometric pattern associated with the use of tumescent anesthesia with lidocaine in rabbits. Furthermore, we assessed its influence on cardiorespiratory parameters and postoperative analgesia. This study included 27 rabbits divided into three groups: GC (without the use of tumescence), GS (use of tumescence with 0.9% NaCl solution), and GL (use of tumescent anesthesia with lidocaine). There was no statistically significant intergroup difference in any stage of the wound healing process on macroscopic evaluations, in the angiogenesis process, or in the process of collagenization and fibroblast deposition. There were significant differences in heart rate (lower in GL), respiratory rate (higher in GC), mean arterial pressure (higher in GL), and expired concentration of isoflurane (lower in GL). There was no significant intergroup difference in the von Frey filament test or the visual analog scale score used to evaluate postoperative analgesia. We concluded that tumescent anesthesia with lidocaine does not impair postoperative tissue repair. Its use features benefits such as reducing the volume of inhaled anesthetic, maintaining the anesthesia plan, stable heart and respiratory rates, and lower hypotension during the surgical procedure.
利多卡因肿胀麻醉对兔几何图形缺陷闭合的影响(小兔)
使用利多卡因肿胀麻醉可以提供更好的内、术后镇痛,有利于广泛的重建手术。然而,利多卡因会干扰愈合过程。因此,本研究旨在评估利多卡因肿胀麻醉对兔诱导和闭合皮肤缺损愈合的局部干扰。此外,我们评估了其对心肺参数和术后镇痛的影响。本研究将27只家兔分为三组:GC组(不使用肿胀)、GS组(使用0.9% NaCl溶液肿胀)和GL组(使用利多卡因肿胀麻醉)。在伤口愈合过程的各个阶段的宏观评价、血管生成过程、胶原和成纤维细胞沉积过程中,组间差异均无统计学意义。心率(GL降低)、呼吸频率(GC升高)、平均动脉压(GL升高)和异氟醚过期浓度(GL降低)差异均有统计学意义。von Frey纤维试验或视觉模拟量表评分用于评估术后镇痛,组间差异无统计学意义。我们得出结论,利多卡因肿胀麻醉不会损害术后组织修复。它的使用具有减少吸入麻醉药量,维持麻醉计划,稳定心脏和呼吸频率,降低手术过程中的低血压等优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ciencia Animal Brasileira
Ciencia Animal Brasileira Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信