“Beat Back the Hun!”: How an Act of ‘Self’-construction was Turned into an Exemplary Case of ‘Othering’

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
A. Musolff
{"title":"“Beat Back the Hun!”: How an Act of ‘Self’-construction was Turned into an Exemplary Case of ‘Othering’","authors":"A. Musolff","doi":"10.1515/anger-2014-0105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To call Germans “Huns”, or collectively, “the Hun”, in Britain today counts as an offensive utterance, and the specific lexical item Hun in this meaning a dysphemism. In current usage, it only occasionally resurfaces in tongue-in- cheek statements, often related to football. The term Hun also features as a citation (and often as a good punning opportunity for headlines) in articles that discuss anti-German incidents and statements and relate them to lingering resentments from World Wars I and II. What gives the Hun nickname such an enduring appeal as an anti-German invective, even if it is used mainly mockingly these days? Should it be regarded as a metaphor, given that its nonfigurative reference to an ancient Asian people is transparent to most users?","PeriodicalId":40371,"journal":{"name":"Angermion-Yearbook for Anglo-German Literary Criticism Intellectual History and Cultural Transfers-Jahrbuch fuer Britisch-Deutsche Kulturbeziehungen","volume":"7 1","pages":"75 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/anger-2014-0105","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angermion-Yearbook for Anglo-German Literary Criticism Intellectual History and Cultural Transfers-Jahrbuch fuer Britisch-Deutsche Kulturbeziehungen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/anger-2014-0105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

To call Germans “Huns”, or collectively, “the Hun”, in Britain today counts as an offensive utterance, and the specific lexical item Hun in this meaning a dysphemism. In current usage, it only occasionally resurfaces in tongue-in- cheek statements, often related to football. The term Hun also features as a citation (and often as a good punning opportunity for headlines) in articles that discuss anti-German incidents and statements and relate them to lingering resentments from World Wars I and II. What gives the Hun nickname such an enduring appeal as an anti-German invective, even if it is used mainly mockingly these days? Should it be regarded as a metaphor, given that its nonfigurative reference to an ancient Asian people is transparent to most users?
“打退德国鬼子!”:一个“自我”建构行为如何变成“他者”建构的典范
在今天的英国,把德国人称为“匈奴人”,或者统称为“匈奴人”,都被认为是一种冒犯性的言语,而在这个意思中,具体的词汇项“Hun”是一种曲解。在目前的用法中,它只是偶尔在半开玩笑的语句中出现,通常与足球有关。在讨论反德事件和声明,并将其与一战和二战中挥之不去的怨恨联系起来的文章中,“Hun”一词也经常被引用(通常是作为标题的好双关语)。是什么让“德国人”这个绰号像反德谩骂词一样经久不衰,尽管如今这个词主要是用来讽刺的?考虑到它对古代亚洲人的非比喻性的提及对大多数用户来说是透明的,它是否应该被视为一个隐喻?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书