The Imperial Periscope: Germany Through the Lens of Empire in British and French Great War Trench Newspapers

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
E. Stice
{"title":"The Imperial Periscope: Germany Through the Lens of Empire in British and French Great War Trench Newspapers","authors":"E. Stice","doi":"10.1515/anger-2014-0106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A hundred years after the start of the Great War, its images and narratives have become part of the common cultural currency of Europe. The horror of the trenches, the underside of technology, the foolishness of generals, the betrayal of youth, and the inevitable disillusionment that followed are all familiar tropes, found in an abundant body of literature, poetry, and historical works. As Samuel Hynes suggested, the war was a “great imaginative event,” which changed the way people thought and resulted in a new set of simplified narratives.1 At the time of the centenary, scholars of the war are re-examining and complicating the familiar narratives of the conflict, from its beginning to its end.2 One of the major directions in recent war scholarship has been to restore the place of empire to the conflict, by reconciling the realities of imperial contributions and experiences to the overall narrative of the war. Valuable works have brought the experiences of colonial troops into the foreground, emphasized the importance of colonial contributions and explored the fighting outside of Europe. Among those works which stand out are Joe Lunn’s Memoirs of the Maelstrom: A Senegalese Oral History of the First World War (1999); David Omissi’s Indian Voices of the Great War: Soldiers’ Letters 1914–1918 (1999); Richard Fogarty’s Race & War in France: Colonial Subjects in the French Army, 1914–1918 (2008); The World in World Wars: Experiences, Perceptions and Perspectives from Africa and Asia, edited by Heike Liebau, Katrin Bromber, Katharina Lange, Dyala Hamzah and Ravi Ahuja (2010); and Race, Empire and First World War Writing, edited by Santanu Das (2011).3 At the same time, scholars of European empires have increasingly turned their attention to imperial culture and the ways","PeriodicalId":40371,"journal":{"name":"Angermion-Yearbook for Anglo-German Literary Criticism Intellectual History and Cultural Transfers-Jahrbuch fuer Britisch-Deutsche Kulturbeziehungen","volume":"7 1","pages":"104 - 91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/anger-2014-0106","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angermion-Yearbook for Anglo-German Literary Criticism Intellectual History and Cultural Transfers-Jahrbuch fuer Britisch-Deutsche Kulturbeziehungen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/anger-2014-0106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A hundred years after the start of the Great War, its images and narratives have become part of the common cultural currency of Europe. The horror of the trenches, the underside of technology, the foolishness of generals, the betrayal of youth, and the inevitable disillusionment that followed are all familiar tropes, found in an abundant body of literature, poetry, and historical works. As Samuel Hynes suggested, the war was a “great imaginative event,” which changed the way people thought and resulted in a new set of simplified narratives.1 At the time of the centenary, scholars of the war are re-examining and complicating the familiar narratives of the conflict, from its beginning to its end.2 One of the major directions in recent war scholarship has been to restore the place of empire to the conflict, by reconciling the realities of imperial contributions and experiences to the overall narrative of the war. Valuable works have brought the experiences of colonial troops into the foreground, emphasized the importance of colonial contributions and explored the fighting outside of Europe. Among those works which stand out are Joe Lunn’s Memoirs of the Maelstrom: A Senegalese Oral History of the First World War (1999); David Omissi’s Indian Voices of the Great War: Soldiers’ Letters 1914–1918 (1999); Richard Fogarty’s Race & War in France: Colonial Subjects in the French Army, 1914–1918 (2008); The World in World Wars: Experiences, Perceptions and Perspectives from Africa and Asia, edited by Heike Liebau, Katrin Bromber, Katharina Lange, Dyala Hamzah and Ravi Ahuja (2010); and Race, Empire and First World War Writing, edited by Santanu Das (2011).3 At the same time, scholars of European empires have increasingly turned their attention to imperial culture and the ways
帝国潜望镜:透过英法大战战壕报纸的帝国镜头看德国
在第一次世界大战开始一百年后,它的图像和叙述已经成为欧洲共同文化货币的一部分。战壕的恐怖,科技的阴暗面,将军们的愚蠢,年轻人的背叛,以及随之而来的不可避免的幻灭,这些都是我们熟悉的比喻,在大量的文学、诗歌和历史作品中都能找到。正如塞缪尔·海因斯所说,这场战争是一场“富有想象力的伟大事件”,它改变了人们的思维方式,产生了一套新的简化叙述在一百周年之际,研究这场战争的学者们正在重新审视这场冲突,并将其从开始到结束的熟悉叙述复杂化最近战争研究的一个主要方向是通过调和帝国对战争的贡献和经历的现实来恢复帝国在冲突中的地位。有价值的作品将殖民军队的经历带到了前台,强调了殖民贡献的重要性,并探讨了欧洲以外的战斗。其中最引人注目的是乔·伦恩的《大漩涡回忆录:第一次世界大战的塞内加尔口述历史》(1999);大卫·奥米西的《伟大战争的印度声音:1914-1918年士兵的信件》(1999);理查德·福格蒂的《法国的种族与战争:法国军队中的殖民地主体,1914-1918》(2008);《世界大战中的世界:来自非洲和亚洲的经验、认知和观点》,Heike Liebau、Katrin Bromber、Katharina Lange、Dyala Hamzah和Ravi Ahuja编辑(2010);2 .《种族、帝国与一战写作》,桑塔努·达斯主编,2011年出版与此同时,研究欧洲帝国的学者也越来越多地将注意力转向帝国文化和帝国方式
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书