Some Traits of Ekphrasis Interweaving with Hierotopy in Theodore Metochites’ Monastery Descriptions

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Dmitri I. Makarov
{"title":"Some Traits of Ekphrasis Interweaving with Hierotopy in Theodore Metochites’ Monastery Descriptions","authors":"Dmitri I. Makarov","doi":"10.15826/adsv.2022.50.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article addresses Theodore Metochites’ assessment of the phenomenon of monastery and monastic life (mostly according to Chapter 40 of his Sententious Notes) in juxtaposition with his predecessors in the ekphrastic genre, such as Michael the Rhetor. The descriptions in question and the “conceptual portrait” of the monastic institution(s) and of the monk as an ascetic draw on a centuries-long Late Antique Jewish and, later on, Christian tradition of conceptualizing Temple, firstly that of Solomon, but then also every Christian one (first of all, St Sophia of Constantinople), as: a) a focal point of the believers’ life; b) antitype of the Heavenly Temple, i. e., of the New Jerusalem, the Divine Tabernacle, whereas its eschatological coming will be seen by the just in the Kingdom of God, according to the Bible. For Theodore, monastery is both spiritual and sensorial realization of the Divine Kingdom on earth, being a brilliant and luminous sacred space. In its description, which is being used by the author as a tool of its contraposition to the turmoil of the theatrum mundi (kosmikon theatron), some traits of hierotopicity are clearly to be seen. The description was carried out in the genre of ekphrasis, but different features of other genres as well (such as philosophical & theological essay or threnos) are discernible there. Metochites cries out that now all the Church buildings and monasteries are destroyed or put in disorder, all their magnificence remaining in the past, and it is Joseph Bryennios in the fifteenth century who picks up the corresponding topics. Also typical for the style of Metochites’ thought are some allusions at Pseudo-­Dionysius the Areopagite. Theodore’s Notes with its Ch. 40 allow us to support the fresher speculations of Byzantinists concerning creative freedom and wild imagination of those Byzantine intellectuals and polymaths who, like the Great logothete, used to construe their own virtual worlds and attract those keen on reading to them.","PeriodicalId":33782,"journal":{"name":"Antichnaia drevnost'' i srednie veka","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antichnaia drevnost'' i srednie veka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15826/adsv.2022.50.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article addresses Theodore Metochites’ assessment of the phenomenon of monastery and monastic life (mostly according to Chapter 40 of his Sententious Notes) in juxtaposition with his predecessors in the ekphrastic genre, such as Michael the Rhetor. The descriptions in question and the “conceptual portrait” of the monastic institution(s) and of the monk as an ascetic draw on a centuries-long Late Antique Jewish and, later on, Christian tradition of conceptualizing Temple, firstly that of Solomon, but then also every Christian one (first of all, St Sophia of Constantinople), as: a) a focal point of the believers’ life; b) antitype of the Heavenly Temple, i. e., of the New Jerusalem, the Divine Tabernacle, whereas its eschatological coming will be seen by the just in the Kingdom of God, according to the Bible. For Theodore, monastery is both spiritual and sensorial realization of the Divine Kingdom on earth, being a brilliant and luminous sacred space. In its description, which is being used by the author as a tool of its contraposition to the turmoil of the theatrum mundi (kosmikon theatron), some traits of hierotopicity are clearly to be seen. The description was carried out in the genre of ekphrasis, but different features of other genres as well (such as philosophical & theological essay or threnos) are discernible there. Metochites cries out that now all the Church buildings and monasteries are destroyed or put in disorder, all their magnificence remaining in the past, and it is Joseph Bryennios in the fifteenth century who picks up the corresponding topics. Also typical for the style of Metochites’ thought are some allusions at Pseudo-­Dionysius the Areopagite. Theodore’s Notes with its Ch. 40 allow us to support the fresher speculations of Byzantinists concerning creative freedom and wild imagination of those Byzantine intellectuals and polymaths who, like the Great logothete, used to construe their own virtual worlds and attract those keen on reading to them.
西奥多·梅托契特《修道院描写》中言词与意象交织的一些特征
这篇文章讨论了Theodore Metochites对修道院现象和修道生活的评价(主要是根据他的《简洁笔记》第40章),并将其与他的前辈,如修辞学家Michael相提并论。所讨论的描述和修道院机构的“概念性肖像”,以及僧侣作为苦行僧的形象,借鉴了长达几个世纪的晚期古代犹太教和后来的基督教传统对寺庙的概念化,首先是所罗门的,然后是每一个基督徒(首先是君士坦丁堡的圣索菲亚),作为:a)信徒生活的焦点;b)天殿的原型,即新耶路撒冷,神圣的会幕,而根据圣经,它的末世来临将由正义的人在上帝的王国中看到。对于西奥多来说,修道院是在地球上的神圣王国的精神和感官的实现,是一个辉煌和发光的神圣空间。在它的描述中,作者将其作为一种工具,与世界戏剧(kosmikon theatron)的动荡形成对比,可以清楚地看到一些人类的特征。描述是在ekphrasis的体裁,但不同的特点,以及其他体裁(如哲学和神学论文或三位一体)是可辨别的。梅托奇派大声疾呼,现在所有的教堂建筑和修道院都被摧毁或被破坏,所有的辉煌都保留在过去,是15世纪的约瑟夫·布里尼奥斯(Joseph Bryennios)提出了相应的话题。梅托奇派思想风格的另一个典型例子是关于伪狄奥尼修斯的典故。《西奥多笔记》的第40章让我们能够支持拜占庭主义者关于那些拜占庭知识分子和博学者的创造性自由和狂野想象力的新鲜猜测,他们就像伟大的logothete一样,习惯于构建自己的虚拟世界,吸引那些热衷于阅读的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antichnaia drevnost'' i srednie veka
Antichnaia drevnost'' i srednie veka Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信