Workfare Schemes as a Tool For Preventing the Further Impoverishment of the Rural Poor

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 SOCIOLOGY
Judith Keller, K. Kovács, Katalin Rácz, N. Swain, M. M. Váradi
{"title":"Workfare Schemes as a Tool For Preventing the Further Impoverishment of the Rural Poor","authors":"Judith Keller, K. Kovács, Katalin Rácz, N. Swain, M. M. Váradi","doi":"10.1515/eec-2016-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article examines workfare schemes in rural Hungary and their contribution to relieving rural poverty. It does so on the basis of an analysis of European Union statistics and a series of semi-structured interviews which were conducted in 2013-2015 as part of a larger project investigating the contemporary state of rural Hungary. The paper comprises four sections: following a short description of the methodology, regional disparities and deprivation in rural areas are introduced with the help of a typology on deprivation and Eurostat data, thus providing evidence for European comparison. Following this, the main findings of our extensive qualitative research into workfare policies in rural Hungary are introduced and discussed on the basis of related legislation4. The article finds that workfare schemes in the rural sector are unique to Central and Eastern Europe, and are especially favoured in Hungary; it also discovers that economists are correct in assessing that said workfare schemes create few new jobs. Nevertheless, they are ‘better than nothing’, and have become embedded in rural society, where they are appreciated by beneficiaries and local officials alike. They necessarily make a paternalistic distinction between the deserving and undeserving poor, and the more commercially-oriented schemes raise issues of market distortion.","PeriodicalId":42882,"journal":{"name":"Eastern European Countryside","volume":"22 1","pages":"26 - 5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eastern European Countryside","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/eec-2016-0001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Abstract This article examines workfare schemes in rural Hungary and their contribution to relieving rural poverty. It does so on the basis of an analysis of European Union statistics and a series of semi-structured interviews which were conducted in 2013-2015 as part of a larger project investigating the contemporary state of rural Hungary. The paper comprises four sections: following a short description of the methodology, regional disparities and deprivation in rural areas are introduced with the help of a typology on deprivation and Eurostat data, thus providing evidence for European comparison. Following this, the main findings of our extensive qualitative research into workfare policies in rural Hungary are introduced and discussed on the basis of related legislation4. The article finds that workfare schemes in the rural sector are unique to Central and Eastern Europe, and are especially favoured in Hungary; it also discovers that economists are correct in assessing that said workfare schemes create few new jobs. Nevertheless, they are ‘better than nothing’, and have become embedded in rural society, where they are appreciated by beneficiaries and local officials alike. They necessarily make a paternalistic distinction between the deserving and undeserving poor, and the more commercially-oriented schemes raise issues of market distortion.
工作福利计划是防止农村贫困人口进一步贫困化的工具
本文考察了匈牙利农村的福利计划及其对减轻农村贫困的贡献。该研究基于对欧盟统计数据的分析和2013-2015年进行的一系列半结构化访谈,这些访谈是调查匈牙利农村当代状况的一个更大项目的一部分。本文包括四个部分:在对方法的简短描述之后,在剥夺和欧盟统计局数据的类型学的帮助下,介绍了农村地区的区域差异和剥夺,从而为欧洲比较提供了证据。接下来,介绍了我们对匈牙利农村福利政策的广泛定性研究的主要发现,并在相关立法的基础上进行了讨论。文章发现,农村部门的工作福利计划是中欧和东欧独有的,在匈牙利尤其受欢迎;报告还发现,经济学家的评估是正确的,即上述福利计划几乎没有创造新的就业机会。尽管如此,它们“总比没有强”,并已融入农村社会,受到受益者和当地官员的赞赏。它们必然会对应得和不应得的穷人做出家长式的区分,而更以商业为导向的计划引发了市场扭曲的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信