De 1951 a 1978: Un rastreo desde la ruptura con el Estructural Funcionalismo hasta el Materialismo Histórico como filosofía de la historia en la vida y obra de Orlando Fals Borda

IF 0.1 Q4 AREA STUDIES
Daniel Ribero Balaguera
{"title":"De 1951 a 1978: Un rastreo desde la ruptura con el Estructural Funcionalismo hasta el Materialismo Histórico como filosofía de la historia en la vida y obra de Orlando Fals Borda","authors":"Daniel Ribero Balaguera","doi":"10.15648/collectivus.vol7num1.2020.2531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolRecorriendo la obra del maestro como una muestra no solo de su parabola vital, sino de su evolucion paradigmatica, el ensayo se sustenta sobre el problema del metodo cientifico, como preocupacion permanente de Fals. Se indaga sobre la mirada estructural funcionalista del Fals inicial, las limitaciones que encontro en dicho paradigma, los hechos significativos de su vida personal y academica que le plantearon la urgencia de pensar o repensar categorias centrales del analisis sociologico tales como subversion o anti-elites. El ensayo profundiza en la propuesta metodologica y teorica, encaminada a generar una practica sociologica nueva, propia, que se oponga a la tradicional practica positivista, dominante en la sociologia colombiana y latinoamericana EnglishGoing through the master’s work as a sample not only of his vital parable but also of his paradigmatic evolution, this essay bases on the problem of the scientific method, as a permanent concern of Fals. It investigates on the functionalist structural view of the first Fals, the limitations found by him in this paradigm, the significant facts of his personal and academic life that raised the urgency to think or rethink central categories of sociological analysis such as subversion or anti-elites. The essay deepens in the methodological and the theoretical proposal, aimed at generating a new sociological practice, own, that opposes the traditional positivist practice, dominant in Colombian and Latin American sociology","PeriodicalId":40498,"journal":{"name":"Collectivus-Revista de Ciencias Sociales","volume":"7 1","pages":"51-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collectivus-Revista de Ciencias Sociales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15648/collectivus.vol7num1.2020.2531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

espanolRecorriendo la obra del maestro como una muestra no solo de su parabola vital, sino de su evolucion paradigmatica, el ensayo se sustenta sobre el problema del metodo cientifico, como preocupacion permanente de Fals. Se indaga sobre la mirada estructural funcionalista del Fals inicial, las limitaciones que encontro en dicho paradigma, los hechos significativos de su vida personal y academica que le plantearon la urgencia de pensar o repensar categorias centrales del analisis sociologico tales como subversion o anti-elites. El ensayo profundiza en la propuesta metodologica y teorica, encaminada a generar una practica sociologica nueva, propia, que se oponga a la tradicional practica positivista, dominante en la sociologia colombiana y latinoamericana EnglishGoing through the master’s work as a sample not only of his vital parable but also of his paradigmatic evolution, this essay bases on the problem of the scientific method, as a permanent concern of Fals. It investigates on the functionalist structural view of the first Fals, the limitations found by him in this paradigm, the significant facts of his personal and academic life that raised the urgency to think or rethink central categories of sociological analysis such as subversion or anti-elites. The essay deepens in the methodological and the theoretical proposal, aimed at generating a new sociological practice, own, that opposes the traditional positivist practice, dominant in Colombian and Latin American sociology
从1951年到1978年:奥兰多·法尔斯·博尔达生平和作品中作为历史哲学的结构功能主义断裂的追溯
这篇文章回顾了大师的工作,不仅作为他生命的抛物线的一个样本,而且作为他的范式进化的一个样本,这篇文章是基于科学方法的问题,这是福尔斯一直关注的问题。本文从功能主义的角度探讨了Fals最初的结构主义观点,我在这种范式中发现的局限性,以及他个人和学术生活中的重要事实,这些事实使他迫切需要思考或重新思考社会学分析的中心类别,如颠覆或反精英。metodologica提案和teorica深入的试验,以期创造一个新的实践sociologica,自己,他反对传统支配实践实证,拉丁美洲哥伦比亚sociologia和EnglishGoing through the master’s work as a sample not only其重要parable确保数据库作paradigmatic evolution, this essay on the problem of the scientific method,作为常驻concern Fals。它调查了第一个错误的功能主义结构主义观点,他在这个范式中发现的限制,他的个人和学术生活的重要事实,使思考或重新思考社会学分析的中心类别,如颠覆或反精英。本文深入探讨了方法论和理论主张,旨在形成一种新的社会学实践,与哥伦比亚和拉丁美洲社会学中占主导地位的传统实证主义实践形成鲜明对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信