Different bonding agents effect on adhesive bond strength: lithium disilicate glass ceramic

M. Lanza, Walisson A Vasconcellos, Giovani Lana Peixoto de Miranda, R. T. R. Peixoto, L. D. Lanza
{"title":"Different bonding agents effect on adhesive bond strength: lithium disilicate glass ceramic","authors":"M. Lanza, Walisson A Vasconcellos, Giovani Lana Peixoto de Miranda, R. T. R. Peixoto, L. D. Lanza","doi":"10.1590/1807-2577.02020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction The silanization of the ceramic surface prior to applying the adhesive and/or resinous materials plays an important role in bond strength. Nowadays, a new family of adhesive systems has been introduced into the market, aiming to simplify the technique of adhesive procedures during cementation. Objective To investigate the effectiveness of different bonding agents containing silane and primer on Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramic (LD) surface by shear bond strength tests. Material and method 130 LD ceramic blocks were included in acrylic resin, polished and washed in ultrasound for 10 minutes. The specimens were divided into 2 groups according to surface treatment: Polished Surface (PS); Hydrofluoric Acid 9.5% - 20s (HF). Each group was divided into 5 subgroups (n = 13) according to bonding agent type: metallic primer containing MDP (ZPrimePlus, Bisco Inc); two traditional silanes (MonobondPlus, IvoclarVivadent / Porcelain Prime, Bisco Inc.); mixture of silane and resin (Kerr Silane, Kerr); mixture of silane and universal adhesive (Single-bond Universal, 3M Espe). The specimens were mounted in a standard device for shear testing (UltradentBonding Assembly), cemented with dual resin cement (RelyX UltimateTM, 3M Espe.) and photo-polymerized for 20s. The samples were tested after 24 hours and 3 months of storage in distilled water at ±36 °C. The data were analyzed by 3-Way Anova and Tukey's test (α = 5%). Result Shear bond strength (SBS) was significantly influenced by surface treatment, bonding agent used and storage (p <0.001). Conclusion Adequate adhesive bond strength to Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramic can be obtained with traditional silanes, combined with HF acid pretreatment surface.","PeriodicalId":21363,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Odontologia da UNESP","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Odontologia da UNESP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.02020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The silanization of the ceramic surface prior to applying the adhesive and/or resinous materials plays an important role in bond strength. Nowadays, a new family of adhesive systems has been introduced into the market, aiming to simplify the technique of adhesive procedures during cementation. Objective To investigate the effectiveness of different bonding agents containing silane and primer on Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramic (LD) surface by shear bond strength tests. Material and method 130 LD ceramic blocks were included in acrylic resin, polished and washed in ultrasound for 10 minutes. The specimens were divided into 2 groups according to surface treatment: Polished Surface (PS); Hydrofluoric Acid 9.5% - 20s (HF). Each group was divided into 5 subgroups (n = 13) according to bonding agent type: metallic primer containing MDP (ZPrimePlus, Bisco Inc); two traditional silanes (MonobondPlus, IvoclarVivadent / Porcelain Prime, Bisco Inc.); mixture of silane and resin (Kerr Silane, Kerr); mixture of silane and universal adhesive (Single-bond Universal, 3M Espe). The specimens were mounted in a standard device for shear testing (UltradentBonding Assembly), cemented with dual resin cement (RelyX UltimateTM, 3M Espe.) and photo-polymerized for 20s. The samples were tested after 24 hours and 3 months of storage in distilled water at ±36 °C. The data were analyzed by 3-Way Anova and Tukey's test (α = 5%). Result Shear bond strength (SBS) was significantly influenced by surface treatment, bonding agent used and storage (p <0.001). Conclusion Adequate adhesive bond strength to Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramic can be obtained with traditional silanes, combined with HF acid pretreatment surface.
不同粘结剂对二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷粘结强度的影响
在应用粘合剂和/或树脂材料之前,陶瓷表面的硅烷化对结合强度起着重要作用。如今,一种新的粘接系统已经进入市场,旨在简化胶结过程中的粘接程序技术。目的通过剪切强度试验,考察硅烷和底漆在二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷(LD)表面的粘接效果。材料和方法将130个LD陶瓷块包在丙烯酸树脂中,在超声下抛光和洗涤10分钟。根据样品表面处理分为两组:抛光表面处理(PS);氢氟酸9.5% - 20s (HF)。每组按粘合剂类型分为5亚组(n = 13):含MDP的金属底漆(ZPrimePlus, Bisco Inc);两种传统硅烷(MonobondPlus, IvoclarVivadent / Porcelain Prime, Bisco Inc.);硅烷与树脂的混合物(Kerr硅烷,Kerr);硅烷和万能胶的混合物(单键万能胶,3M Espe)。将试样安装在标准剪切测试设备(UltradentBonding Assembly)中,用双树脂水泥(RelyX UltimateTM, 3M Espe.)胶结,光聚合20s。样品在±36°C蒸馏水中保存24小时和3个月后进行测试。采用3-Way Anova和Tukey检验(α = 5%)对数据进行分析。结果表面处理、使用的粘结剂和贮存对剪切粘结强度(SBS)有显著影响(p <0.001)。结论采用传统硅烷结合氢氟酸表面预处理,可获得与二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷良好的粘结强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
15 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信