A double-blinded randomized clinical trial of pain perception during orthodontic treatment

Silvana Rossi, Milton Santamaria Júnior, G. C. Venezian, Carolina Carmo de Menezes, J. E. Souza, S. Vedovello
{"title":"A double-blinded randomized clinical trial of pain perception during orthodontic treatment","authors":"Silvana Rossi, Milton Santamaria Júnior, G. C. Venezian, Carolina Carmo de Menezes, J. E. Souza, S. Vedovello","doi":"10.1590/1807-2577.00722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Orthodontic movement can cause painful symptoms, especially in the early stages of treatment. Objective This study aimed to compare the performance of chewing gum and ibuprofen in pain control during the initial period of orthodontic treatment. Material and method A randomized blind clinical trial, with an allocation ratio of 1:1, was developed with patients aged ≥18 years old. The sample size was established considering a significance level of 5% and test power of 80%, resulting in a minimum of 30 volunteers per group (n=90). Participants were paired regarding sex, age, the severity of malocclusion, defined by the Dental Health Component (DHC) of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN), and crowding, determined by Little’s irregularity index. The sample was randomly allocated to three groups: Group I (control) placebo; Group II chewing gum; and Group III Ibuprofen. Pain perception was evaluated by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in the first 24, 36, and 48 hours after activation of the orthodontic appliance. The data were analyzed by generalized linear models for repeated measures in time. Result No statistically significant difference (p>0.05) was observed among the groups for the methods of pain therapy evaluated in 24, 36, and 48 hours post-activation. Conclusion There was no difference among the method used for pain control during the orthodontic treatment.","PeriodicalId":21363,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Odontologia da UNESP","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Odontologia da UNESP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.00722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Orthodontic movement can cause painful symptoms, especially in the early stages of treatment. Objective This study aimed to compare the performance of chewing gum and ibuprofen in pain control during the initial period of orthodontic treatment. Material and method A randomized blind clinical trial, with an allocation ratio of 1:1, was developed with patients aged ≥18 years old. The sample size was established considering a significance level of 5% and test power of 80%, resulting in a minimum of 30 volunteers per group (n=90). Participants were paired regarding sex, age, the severity of malocclusion, defined by the Dental Health Component (DHC) of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN), and crowding, determined by Little’s irregularity index. The sample was randomly allocated to three groups: Group I (control) placebo; Group II chewing gum; and Group III Ibuprofen. Pain perception was evaluated by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in the first 24, 36, and 48 hours after activation of the orthodontic appliance. The data were analyzed by generalized linear models for repeated measures in time. Result No statistically significant difference (p>0.05) was observed among the groups for the methods of pain therapy evaluated in 24, 36, and 48 hours post-activation. Conclusion There was no difference among the method used for pain control during the orthodontic treatment.
正畸治疗中疼痛感知的双盲随机临床试验
正畸运动可引起疼痛症状,特别是在治疗初期。目的比较口香糖和布洛芬在正畸治疗初期疼痛控制的效果。材料与方法采用1∶1的随机盲临床试验,患者年龄≥18岁。样本量的建立考虑了5%的显著性水平和80%的检验能力,因此每组至少有30名志愿者(n=90)。参与者根据性别、年龄、错牙合的严重程度(由牙齿健康成分(DHC)定义的正畸治疗需求指数(IOTN))和拥挤程度(由利特尔不规则指数确定)进行配对。样本随机分为三组:第一组(对照组)安慰剂;第二组口香糖;第三组布洛芬。在正畸矫治器激活后的前24、36和48小时,用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛感觉。采用广义线性模型对数据进行时间重复测量分析。结果激活后24、36、48 h各组疼痛治疗效果比较,差异均无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论正畸治疗过程中疼痛控制方法的差异无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信