Analysis of production resources improvement strategies in make-to-stock environments managed by the simplified drum-buffer-rope system

Q3 Engineering
Humberto Govoni, F. B. Souza, Robson Flávio Castro, José de Souza Rodrigues, S. Pires
{"title":"Analysis of production resources improvement strategies in make-to-stock environments managed by the simplified drum-buffer-rope system","authors":"Humberto Govoni, F. B. Souza, Robson Flávio Castro, José de Souza Rodrigues, S. Pires","doi":"10.1590/1806-9649-2021v28e55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Theory of Constraints (TOC) states that every system has a single constraint that limits its performance, on which improvement efforts should be concentrated. This paper compared, through computer simulation, several methods of identifying the capacity-constrained resource in the perspective of a process of continuous improvement. Six make-to-stock (MTS) production line configurations managed by the Simplified Drum-Buffer-Rope (S-DBR) system were simulated, in which six improvement methods were applied, three of them based on the TOC literature, and their performance measured and compared in terms of cycle time and order fill rate. The results showed that, in balanced systems, improvements spread over all resources allowed better results, because, in this case, it is necessary to improve everything to benefit the overall performance. In unbalanced environments, on the other hand, the three methods recommended by TOC, which recommend efforts concentrated on the weakest point of the system, achieved superior performance, with emphasis on the strategy based on the level of utilization. In addition to advancing the frontiers of knowledge in continuous improvement and TOC, the research results show that managers should focus their attention on the resource with the highest degree of utilization to get better and faster performance gains.","PeriodicalId":35415,"journal":{"name":"Gestao e Producao","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gestao e Producao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9649-2021v28e55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract: Theory of Constraints (TOC) states that every system has a single constraint that limits its performance, on which improvement efforts should be concentrated. This paper compared, through computer simulation, several methods of identifying the capacity-constrained resource in the perspective of a process of continuous improvement. Six make-to-stock (MTS) production line configurations managed by the Simplified Drum-Buffer-Rope (S-DBR) system were simulated, in which six improvement methods were applied, three of them based on the TOC literature, and their performance measured and compared in terms of cycle time and order fill rate. The results showed that, in balanced systems, improvements spread over all resources allowed better results, because, in this case, it is necessary to improve everything to benefit the overall performance. In unbalanced environments, on the other hand, the three methods recommended by TOC, which recommend efforts concentrated on the weakest point of the system, achieved superior performance, with emphasis on the strategy based on the level of utilization. In addition to advancing the frontiers of knowledge in continuous improvement and TOC, the research results show that managers should focus their attention on the resource with the highest degree of utilization to get better and faster performance gains.
简化鼓-缓冲-绳索系统管理下库存环境下生产资源改善策略分析
约束理论(TOC)认为每个系统都有一个限制其性能的约束,改进工作应该集中在这个约束上。本文从持续改进过程的角度,通过计算机模拟比较了几种识别能力约束资源的方法。对简化鼓-缓冲-绳索(S-DBR)系统管理的6条MTS生产线配置进行了仿真,采用了6种改进方法(其中3种基于TOC文献),并从周期时间和订单填充率两方面对它们的性能进行了测量和比较。结果表明,在平衡的系统中,在所有资源上进行改进可以获得更好的结果,因为在这种情况下,有必要改进所有内容以使整体性能受益。另一方面,在不平衡的环境中,TOC推荐的三种方法,侧重于系统的最薄弱环节,强调基于利用水平的策略,取得了更好的效果。研究结果表明,除了在持续改进和TOC方面推进知识前沿外,管理者还应将注意力集中在利用程度最高的资源上,以获得更好更快的绩效收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gestao e Producao
Gestao e Producao Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
44 weeks
期刊介绍: Gestão & Produção is a journal published four times a year year (March, June, September and December) by the Departamento de Engenharia de Produção (DEP) of Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar). The first issue of Gestão & Produção was published in April, 1994. Actually, G&P was result of experience of professors of DEP/UFSCar in editing, in the beginning, "Cadernos DEP" in the 1980s, followed by "Cadernos de Engenharia de Produção". The last three issues of "Cadernos de Engenharia de Produção" were a test previous to the launch of Gestão & Produção because most of the journal characteristics were already established, like regularity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信