Ítem único de autoeficacia académica: evidencias adicionales de validez con el modelo Big Five en estudiantes universitarios

Q4 Psychology
S. Dominguez-Lara, Jhonathan S. Navarro-Loli, Rony Prada-Chapoñan
{"title":"Ítem único de autoeficacia académica: evidencias adicionales de validez con el modelo Big Five en estudiantes universitarios","authors":"S. Dominguez-Lara, Jhonathan S. Navarro-Loli, Rony Prada-Chapoñan","doi":"10.15689/AP.2019.1802.16070.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Single item academic self-efficacy: Further Validity Evidences with Big Five Model in College Students The aim of the study was to evaluate if the academic self-efficacy single-item (IUAA) has convergent validity by its relationship with the Big Five personality traits (5BF) in 450 university students (61.1% female; Mage=20.9; SDage=2.6) from a private college in Chiclayo (Peru). Besides the IUAA, we used the Big Five Inventory-15p (BFI-Sp) to assess the 5BF with 15 items (three items per factor). The research hypothesis was tested using a one-way ANOVA, with students’ grouping according to their IUAA response. The results show conscientiousness as the trait with higher differences between groups, followed by openness and extraversion. Additionally, the groups do not differ substantially in agreeableness or neuroticism. Despite the limitations, the IUAA is an appropriate measure to assess academic self-efficacy in college students.","PeriodicalId":37995,"journal":{"name":"Avaliacao Psicologica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15689/AP.2019.1802.16070.12","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avaliacao Psicologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15689/AP.2019.1802.16070.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Single item academic self-efficacy: Further Validity Evidences with Big Five Model in College Students The aim of the study was to evaluate if the academic self-efficacy single-item (IUAA) has convergent validity by its relationship with the Big Five personality traits (5BF) in 450 university students (61.1% female; Mage=20.9; SDage=2.6) from a private college in Chiclayo (Peru). Besides the IUAA, we used the Big Five Inventory-15p (BFI-Sp) to assess the 5BF with 15 items (three items per factor). The research hypothesis was tested using a one-way ANOVA, with students’ grouping according to their IUAA response. The results show conscientiousness as the trait with higher differences between groups, followed by openness and extraversion. Additionally, the groups do not differ substantially in agreeableness or neuroticism. Despite the limitations, the IUAA is an appropriate measure to assess academic self-efficacy in college students.
学术自我效能感的独特项目:大学生五大模型效度的额外证据
摘要本研究旨在通过对450名大学生(61.1%为女生;61.1%为大学生)学业自我效能单项与大五人格特质(5BF)的关系,评价学业自我效能单项是否具有收敛效度。法师= 20.9;年龄=2.6),来自秘鲁Chiclayo的一所私立大学。除了IUAA之外,我们还使用了Big Five Inventory-15p (BFI-Sp),用15个项目(每个因素3个项目)来评估5BF。研究假设使用单因素方差分析进行检验,学生根据他们的IUAA反应进行分组。结果显示,尽责性是组间差异较大的特征,其次是开放性和外向性。此外,两组在亲和性和神经质程度上没有显著差异。尽管存在局限性,但IUAA是一种评估大学生学业自我效能感的合适方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Avaliacao Psicologica
Avaliacao Psicologica Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal Avaliação Psicológica - Official Publication of the Brazilian Institute of Psychological Assessment (IBAP). This journal is a quarterly publication, it is also a vehicle for the dissemination of scientific Ibero-American area of psychological and educational assessment. Its objective is to divulge the advances of the theory, searches and practical in the area of the evaluation in Psychology, Education, Counseling, Organizational Behavior, Human Resources and others related disciplines. The publishing process aims to present to the scientific community a text that reflects a significant and actualize contribution. Publishes original papers, preferably research reports, but also the literature review articles, technical notes and short reports of research, book reviews and news on the topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信