"They have kidnapped our river": Dam removal conflicts in catalonia and their relation to ecosystem services perceptions

IF 2.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Mathias Brummer, B. Rodríguez-Labajos, T. Nguyen, D. Jorda-Capdevila
{"title":"\"They have kidnapped our river\": Dam removal conflicts in catalonia and their relation to ecosystem services perceptions","authors":"Mathias Brummer, B. Rodríguez-Labajos, T. Nguyen, D. Jorda-Capdevila","doi":"10.15488/2217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"River restoration is essential to guarantee access to ecosystem services provided by free-flowing rivers. One mechanism to restore rivers is the decommissioning of run-of-the-river dams, but restoration can create opposition as anthropised landscapes form part of the environmental history and imaginary. To facilitate decision-making, actorsʼ perceptions on ecosystem services for and against dam removal should be considered. We analyse perceptions on ecosystem services at two levels of study in Catalonia (Spain): the Catalan context and two local cases of dam removal in the Ter River Basin. Local case studies illustrate that combining participatory mapping and interviews makes contrasting values conspicuous and contributes to conflict understanding. Additionally, we acknowledge a dichotomy of perceptions between locals and outsiders, and the relevance of cultural values, environmental aesthetics, and history for actorsʼ positioning. We propose the engagement of local stakeholders at the basin level through participatory approaches for the sake of understanding water conflicts, as decision making will rarely achieve social sustainability without local support.","PeriodicalId":54334,"journal":{"name":"Water Alternatives-An Interdisciplinary Journal on Water Politics and Development","volume":"212 1","pages":"744-768"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Alternatives-An Interdisciplinary Journal on Water Politics and Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15488/2217","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

River restoration is essential to guarantee access to ecosystem services provided by free-flowing rivers. One mechanism to restore rivers is the decommissioning of run-of-the-river dams, but restoration can create opposition as anthropised landscapes form part of the environmental history and imaginary. To facilitate decision-making, actorsʼ perceptions on ecosystem services for and against dam removal should be considered. We analyse perceptions on ecosystem services at two levels of study in Catalonia (Spain): the Catalan context and two local cases of dam removal in the Ter River Basin. Local case studies illustrate that combining participatory mapping and interviews makes contrasting values conspicuous and contributes to conflict understanding. Additionally, we acknowledge a dichotomy of perceptions between locals and outsiders, and the relevance of cultural values, environmental aesthetics, and history for actorsʼ positioning. We propose the engagement of local stakeholders at the basin level through participatory approaches for the sake of understanding water conflicts, as decision making will rarely achieve social sustainability without local support.
“他们绑架了我们的河流”:加泰罗尼亚的大坝拆除冲突及其与生态系统服务观念的关系
河流恢复对于保证人们获得自由流动的河流所提供的生态系统服务至关重要。恢复河流的一种机制是使河流大坝退役,但由于人为的景观构成了环境历史和想象的一部分,恢复可能会产生反对意见。为了促进决策,应考虑行动者对生态系统服务的看法,以支持和反对拆除大坝。我们在加泰罗尼亚(西班牙)的两个研究层面上分析了对生态系统服务的看法:加泰罗尼亚的背景和特尔河流域两个当地的大坝拆除案例。当地案例研究表明,将参与式测绘和访谈相结合,可以突出不同的价值观,有助于理解冲突。此外,我们承认本地人和外地人之间的观念存在二分法,以及文化价值观、环境美学和历史对演员定位的相关性。为了理解水资源冲突,我们建议通过参与式方法让流域层面的当地利益相关者参与进来,因为没有当地的支持,决策很难实现社会的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Water Alternatives-An Interdisciplinary Journal on Water Politics and Development
Water Alternatives-An Interdisciplinary Journal on Water Politics and Development Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Water permeates all realms of life and many scientific disciplines. Water problems are often taken as technical issues, subject to rationalization, optimization and best addressed by expert knowledge. Yet, in the past three decades water issues have proved to be highly divisive and have generated heated debates. Engineer-centered approaches have been challenged or paralleled by concerns for the role of social organization, institutions, power structures and, more generally, politics; economists have assumed an increasingly prominent role in stressing the significance of demand management and economic efficiency; environmentalists have been active in introducing a more holistic view of ecosystems, underlining the importance of water for the environment and human health; social activists have vied for framing access to water as a human right.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信