Unresolved Comfort Women Issue

IF 0.1 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Patrick Hein
{"title":"Unresolved Comfort Women Issue","authors":"Patrick Hein","doi":"10.14731/KJIS.2016.12.14.3.447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even though 2015 marked the 70 th anniversary of the end of World War II, legacies about the sufferings of so-called comfort women (sexual slaves) continue to remain contested and unresolved in Japan. It is the purpose of the article to examine what kinds of reference points may shape prospects of reconciliation. Though scholarship keeps focusing on apologies and compensation issues, the prerequisites for reconciliation have seldom been dealt with. The article contends that a precondition for reconciliation is the existence of a common set of basic values and principles. How can one reconcile if evil is not recognized as evil? How can one be affected by reconciliation unless one actually meets survivors? By analyzing Japanese government sources, interviews and statements, the article shows how the change of narratives from universal and principled to pragmatic has undermined both state to state and bottom-up prospects for true and enduring reconciliation between Japan and countries affected by military sexual slavery. The comfort women issue has become an issue where history has become deeply intertwined with gender, whereby gender is used to obstruct and obscure history.","PeriodicalId":41543,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of International Studies","volume":"14 1","pages":"447-460"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of International Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14731/KJIS.2016.12.14.3.447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Even though 2015 marked the 70 th anniversary of the end of World War II, legacies about the sufferings of so-called comfort women (sexual slaves) continue to remain contested and unresolved in Japan. It is the purpose of the article to examine what kinds of reference points may shape prospects of reconciliation. Though scholarship keeps focusing on apologies and compensation issues, the prerequisites for reconciliation have seldom been dealt with. The article contends that a precondition for reconciliation is the existence of a common set of basic values and principles. How can one reconcile if evil is not recognized as evil? How can one be affected by reconciliation unless one actually meets survivors? By analyzing Japanese government sources, interviews and statements, the article shows how the change of narratives from universal and principled to pragmatic has undermined both state to state and bottom-up prospects for true and enduring reconciliation between Japan and countries affected by military sexual slavery. The comfort women issue has become an issue where history has become deeply intertwined with gender, whereby gender is used to obstruct and obscure history.
未解决的慰安妇问题
尽管2015年是第二次世界大战结束70周年,但在日本,关于所谓慰安妇(性奴隶)苦难的遗留问题仍然存在争议和悬而未决。本文的目的是研究什么样的参考点可能影响和解的前景。虽然学术界一直关注道歉和赔偿问题,但和解的先决条件却很少得到解决。本文认为,和解的先决条件是存在一套共同的基本价值和原则。如果邪恶不被认为是邪恶,一个人如何和解?如果没有见到幸存者,怎么可能受到和解的影响呢?通过分析日本政府的消息来源、采访和声明,本文展示了叙事从普遍和原则性到务实的转变如何破坏了国家与国家之间以及自下而上的日本与受军慰安妇影响的国家之间真正和持久和解的前景。慰安妇问题已经成为历史与性别深深交织在一起的问题,性别被用来阻碍和掩盖历史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Journal of International Studies
Korean Journal of International Studies INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信