Petrological Features of Korsun'-Novomyrhorod Anorthosite-Rapakivi Granite Pluton

IF 0.5 Q4 MINERALOGY
S. Kryvdik, O. Dubyna, P. Yakubenko
{"title":"Petrological Features of Korsun'-Novomyrhorod Anorthosite-Rapakivi Granite Pluton","authors":"S. Kryvdik, O. Dubyna, P. Yakubenko","doi":"10.15407/mineraljournal.43.04.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Korsun’-Novomyrhorod pluton is the second after the Korosten one in terms of the scale of Proterozoic (1757-1748 Ma) anorthosite-rapakivi-granite magmatism in the Ukrainian Shield. According to geochronological data, pluton was formed as a result of multiple ascending and crystallization of basic to acidic melts. Differentiation of initial melts because to be responsible for gabbro-anorthosite and monzonites series crystallization. Whereas rapakivi granites, which are predominate in the modern erosion level, were formed from felsic magma not directly related with differentiation of basic melt. In view of the current level of mineralogical research, it is difficult to use modern geobarometry methods to reliably estimate the depth of rocks crystallization. At the same time, a number of factors (absence of volcanic and dike analogues of basic rocks, insignificant distribution of pegmatite bodies, predominance of high-Fe mafic minerals, absence of primary magnetite, etc.) indicate deeper conditions for rocks disclosed by modern erosional cut in comparition to similar Korosten pluton. Therefore, the liquid line of dissent, petrological and mineralogical features of the rocks can be explained by the reducing (low fO2) or abyssal conditions of their formation. It is possible that the deeper conditions of crystallization of parental melt are due to more distinctly developed syenitic trend of evolution with the appearance of high-Fe syenites during final stages. Preliminary data indicate on possibility of vertical layering of gabbro-anorthosite massifs, which manifested by increasing proportion of high-Fe basic rocks with depth. Available isotope-geochemical studies do not provide unambiguous data on regarding reservoirs of primary melts implaying both mantle and mixed mantle-crustal their origin. The evolution of the petrochemical features of basic rocks, in our opinion, is in better agreement with their formation as result of differentiation of the primary high-alumina tholeiitic melt, significantly contaminated by lower crustal material. This determined the subalkaline nature of basic rocks and a significant predominance of norites, in comparition to more typical gabbros, and monzonites. In contrast to the previously proposed hypotheses of the formation of intermediate rocks because of partial melting of felsic rocks by basic intrusions, or mingling of basic and acidic melts, some of petrochemical features and geological position can be satisfactorily explained by their crystallization from the residual melt.","PeriodicalId":53834,"journal":{"name":"Mineralogical Journal-Ukraine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mineralogical Journal-Ukraine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/mineraljournal.43.04.025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MINERALOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Korsun’-Novomyrhorod pluton is the second after the Korosten one in terms of the scale of Proterozoic (1757-1748 Ma) anorthosite-rapakivi-granite magmatism in the Ukrainian Shield. According to geochronological data, pluton was formed as a result of multiple ascending and crystallization of basic to acidic melts. Differentiation of initial melts because to be responsible for gabbro-anorthosite and monzonites series crystallization. Whereas rapakivi granites, which are predominate in the modern erosion level, were formed from felsic magma not directly related with differentiation of basic melt. In view of the current level of mineralogical research, it is difficult to use modern geobarometry methods to reliably estimate the depth of rocks crystallization. At the same time, a number of factors (absence of volcanic and dike analogues of basic rocks, insignificant distribution of pegmatite bodies, predominance of high-Fe mafic minerals, absence of primary magnetite, etc.) indicate deeper conditions for rocks disclosed by modern erosional cut in comparition to similar Korosten pluton. Therefore, the liquid line of dissent, petrological and mineralogical features of the rocks can be explained by the reducing (low fO2) or abyssal conditions of their formation. It is possible that the deeper conditions of crystallization of parental melt are due to more distinctly developed syenitic trend of evolution with the appearance of high-Fe syenites during final stages. Preliminary data indicate on possibility of vertical layering of gabbro-anorthosite massifs, which manifested by increasing proportion of high-Fe basic rocks with depth. Available isotope-geochemical studies do not provide unambiguous data on regarding reservoirs of primary melts implaying both mantle and mixed mantle-crustal their origin. The evolution of the petrochemical features of basic rocks, in our opinion, is in better agreement with their formation as result of differentiation of the primary high-alumina tholeiitic melt, significantly contaminated by lower crustal material. This determined the subalkaline nature of basic rocks and a significant predominance of norites, in comparition to more typical gabbros, and monzonites. In contrast to the previously proposed hypotheses of the formation of intermediate rocks because of partial melting of felsic rocks by basic intrusions, or mingling of basic and acidic melts, some of petrochemical features and geological position can be satisfactorily explained by their crystallization from the residual melt.
Korsun’- novmyrhorod斜长岩- rapakivi花岗岩岩体岩石学特征
在乌克兰地盾元古代(1757 ~ 1748 Ma)斜长岩-拉帕基维-花岗岩岩浆作用规模方面,Korsun - novmyrhorod岩体是仅次于Korosten的第二个岩体。根据年代学资料,岩体是由碱性到酸性熔体的多次上升结晶作用形成的。初始熔体的分异是由辉长岩-斜长岩和二长岩系列结晶引起的。而在现代侵蚀层中占主导地位的rapakivi花岗岩则是由与基性熔体分异无直接关系的长英质岩浆形成的。以目前的矿物学研究水平来看,很难用现代的大气测量方法可靠地估计岩石结晶深度。与此同时,许多因素(基性岩石中缺乏火山和岩脉类似物,伟晶岩体分布不明显,高铁质矿物占优势,缺乏原生磁铁矿等)表明,与类似的Korosten岩体相比,现代侵蚀切割所揭示的岩石条件更深。因此,岩石的异质液线、岩石学和矿物学特征可以用它们的还原(低fO2)或深海形成条件来解释。母体熔体较深的结晶条件可能是由于在最后阶段出现了高铁正长岩,正长岩的演化趋势更为明显。初步资料表明辉长-斜长岩体存在垂直分层的可能性,表现为高铁基性岩的比例随深度增加而增加。现有的同位素地球化学研究并没有提供关于原生熔体储层对地幔和混合地幔-地壳起源的影响的明确数据。基性岩的石油化学特征的演化与基性岩的形成更为一致,这是原生高铝拉斑岩熔体分异的结果,受到下地壳物质的严重污染。这决定了基性岩的亚碱性,与更典型的辉长岩和二长岩相比,北岩占明显优势。与以往提出的由基性侵入岩部分熔融或基性和酸性熔体混合形成中间岩的假设不同,残余熔体的结晶可以很好地解释一些石化特征和地质位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信