Effectiveness of The Project Management in Libraries: A Systematic Review

Q4 Social Sciences
Bilgi Dunyasi Pub Date : 2023-06-14 DOI:10.15612/bd.2023.697
Fezile Özdamlı, Sualeha Sultan, Tolgay Karanfiller
{"title":"Effectiveness of The Project Management in Libraries: A Systematic Review","authors":"Fezile Özdamlı, Sualeha Sultan, Tolgay Karanfiller","doi":"10.15612/bd.2023.697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technology is used to keep track of things and timing and make the best decision on the information available. Project Management (PM) has to offer through its various software and technical tools. PM software has always been compared to the traditional ways of libraries. If a library has always been compared to its traditional ways of doing projects, PM brings systematic strategies to the planned project of libraries from beginning to end. The main objective of this research is to find a systematic literature review on the software of PM, the -advantages of using PM in libraries, and the challenges faced by the libraries using PM. This research used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) to illustrate the systematic literature review. The terms “Project Management” and (“library” OR “libraries”) were applied to the advanced research of the five databases: Ebscohost, Emerald, Scopus, WOS, and ScienceDirect were selected databases to ensure relevant studies were captured. The main finding from the research is that using Project Management software in libraries has many advantages, such as clarity of planning and a good understanding of technical tools and software, despite many challenges. It provides end-to-end planning and can be adapted to frequent changes to increase productivity and success. In addition, unlike other studies, this study indicates the missing gap in the literature, and it is hoped that it will guide the researchers.","PeriodicalId":38318,"journal":{"name":"Bilgi Dunyasi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bilgi Dunyasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15612/bd.2023.697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Technology is used to keep track of things and timing and make the best decision on the information available. Project Management (PM) has to offer through its various software and technical tools. PM software has always been compared to the traditional ways of libraries. If a library has always been compared to its traditional ways of doing projects, PM brings systematic strategies to the planned project of libraries from beginning to end. The main objective of this research is to find a systematic literature review on the software of PM, the -advantages of using PM in libraries, and the challenges faced by the libraries using PM. This research used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) to illustrate the systematic literature review. The terms “Project Management” and (“library” OR “libraries”) were applied to the advanced research of the five databases: Ebscohost, Emerald, Scopus, WOS, and ScienceDirect were selected databases to ensure relevant studies were captured. The main finding from the research is that using Project Management software in libraries has many advantages, such as clarity of planning and a good understanding of technical tools and software, despite many challenges. It provides end-to-end planning and can be adapted to frequent changes to increase productivity and success. In addition, unlike other studies, this study indicates the missing gap in the literature, and it is hoped that it will guide the researchers.
图书馆项目管理的有效性:系统评价
技术被用来跟踪事物和时间,并根据可用的信息做出最佳决策。项目管理(PM)必须通过它的各种软件和技术工具来提供。PM软件总是与传统的库方式相比较。如果一个图书馆总是与传统的项目方式相比较,那么PM从开始到结束都为图书馆的计划项目带来了系统的策略。本研究的主要目的是对项目管理软件、图书馆使用项目管理的优势以及图书馆使用项目管理面临的挑战进行系统的文献综述。本研究采用系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)来说明系统文献综述。术语“项目管理”和(“图书馆”或“图书馆”)应用于五个数据库的高级研究:Ebscohost, Emerald, Scopus, WOS和ScienceDirect是选定的数据库,以确保捕获相关研究。研究的主要发现是,尽管存在许多挑战,但在图书馆中使用项目管理软件有许多优点,例如计划的清晰度和对技术工具和软件的良好理解。它提供了端到端的计划,并且可以适应频繁的变更,从而提高生产力和成功。此外,与其他研究不同的是,本研究指出了文献中缺失的空白,希望能对研究者起到指导作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bilgi Dunyasi
Bilgi Dunyasi Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信