Total factor productivity growth in upper middle income Balkan countries from 2000-2017, total economy and sectoral approach: the growth accounting method

IF 0.6 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS
Maja Baćović, Maja Baćović
{"title":"Total factor productivity growth in upper middle income Balkan countries from 2000-2017, total economy and sectoral approach: the growth accounting method","authors":"Maja Baćović, Maja Baćović","doi":"10.15611/AOE.2021.1.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author estimated TFP in the total economy and at sectoral level (agriculture, industry and services) in seven upper middle-income Balkan countries (Albania, Bulgaria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia and Romania) from 2000 to 2017, applying the growth accounting approach. This is the first study presenting estimates on TFP on a sectoral level for a selected group of countries, and also the first study presenting estimates on TFP in the total economy for a selected time period. The sample was selected based on income level and geographic criteria. All countries are ex-centrally planned economies. Although several studies presented growth accounting for Central and Eastern European countries for earlier years, very few presented it for Balkan countries, and none for this time frame and using a sectoral approach. In addition, the time frame was split into two subperiods, 2000-2009 and 2010-2017, to gain a better insight into TFP growth in the earlier transitional phase in each country, and including changes which may occur as the country is moving towards a higher income level. Although some countries from the sample, such as Bulgaria and Romania, made transitional progress earlier than others, the economies of all countries from the sample experienced negative trends during the global financial crisis (2007-2009), so the study included that period in the first subperiod. Other than this, the contribution to the literature is the presented methodology for sectoral TFP computation. The research confirmed the importance of sectoral TFP analysis and subperiod analysis, as variations between TFP in the total economy and at sectoral level are significant, but also between two sub periods.","PeriodicalId":43088,"journal":{"name":"Argumenta Oeconomica","volume":"331 1","pages":"79-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argumenta Oeconomica","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15611/AOE.2021.1.04","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The author estimated TFP in the total economy and at sectoral level (agriculture, industry and services) in seven upper middle-income Balkan countries (Albania, Bulgaria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia and Romania) from 2000 to 2017, applying the growth accounting approach. This is the first study presenting estimates on TFP on a sectoral level for a selected group of countries, and also the first study presenting estimates on TFP in the total economy for a selected time period. The sample was selected based on income level and geographic criteria. All countries are ex-centrally planned economies. Although several studies presented growth accounting for Central and Eastern European countries for earlier years, very few presented it for Balkan countries, and none for this time frame and using a sectoral approach. In addition, the time frame was split into two subperiods, 2000-2009 and 2010-2017, to gain a better insight into TFP growth in the earlier transitional phase in each country, and including changes which may occur as the country is moving towards a higher income level. Although some countries from the sample, such as Bulgaria and Romania, made transitional progress earlier than others, the economies of all countries from the sample experienced negative trends during the global financial crisis (2007-2009), so the study included that period in the first subperiod. Other than this, the contribution to the literature is the presented methodology for sectoral TFP computation. The research confirmed the importance of sectoral TFP analysis and subperiod analysis, as variations between TFP in the total economy and at sectoral level are significant, but also between two sub periods.
2000-2017年巴尔干中高收入国家全要素生产率增长,经济总量和部门方法:增长核算方法
作者运用增长核算方法估算了2000年至2017年七个巴尔干中高收入国家(阿尔巴尼亚、保加利亚、波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那、北马其顿、黑山、塞尔维亚和罗马尼亚)的总体经济和部门层面(农业、工业和服务业)的全要素生产率。这是第一份在部门一级对选定国家集团提出全要素生产率估计的研究报告,也是第一份在选定时期对整个经济的全要素生产率提出估计的研究报告。样本是根据收入水平和地理标准选择的。所有国家都是非中央计划经济。虽然有几项研究提出了中欧和东欧国家较早几年的增长核算,但很少有研究提出了巴尔干国家的增长核算,也没有一项研究是针对这一时间范围和采用部门方法的。此外,将时间框架分为2000-2009年和2010-2017年两个子阶段,以便更好地了解每个国家较早过渡阶段的全要素生产率增长情况,并包括随着该国向更高收入水平迈进而可能发生的变化。虽然样本中的一些国家,如保加利亚和罗马尼亚,比其他国家更早地取得了转型进展,但样本中所有国家的经济在全球金融危机(2007-2009年)期间都经历了负面趋势,因此该研究将这一时期纳入第一子期。除此之外,对文献的贡献是提出了计算部门全要素生产率的方法。研究证实了部门TFP分析和分时期分析的重要性,因为整个经济和部门一级的TFP之间的差异很大,而且两个分时期之间的差异也很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信