Changes in the structure of trade between China and the countries of central and eastern Europe in the period after the initiation of format 17+1

IF 0.6 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS
G. Nikolić
{"title":"Changes in the structure of trade between China and the countries of central and eastern Europe in the period after the initiation of format 17+1","authors":"G. Nikolić","doi":"10.15611/aoe.2021.2.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper discusses the consequences of cooperation between China and CEE countries, also known as 17+1, an initiative founded in 2012 by Beijing to promote business and investment relations between China and those economies. The main hope of CEE countries was that they would be able to reduce their strong trade deficits, but today the question arises whether their expectations were unrealistic. After calculating the quantitative indicators of cumulative CEE trade with China in 2011-2018, the author tested the first hypothesis, i.e. whether structures of merchandise exports from CEE countries have become better adjusted to the commodity imports structure of China. In order to prove that hypothesis, the study used four indicators of similarity: Cosines and the Finger-Kreinin similarity index, as well as the Bray-Curtis and Integrated Similarity Index. To improve the analysis, the author controlled for additional factors such as changes in CEE countries’ export structures through tendencies of shares of medium and high-tech products in their total exports. The second hypothesis is that in the observed period major CEE economies detected positive qualitative changes in their merchandise exports to China. The qualitative changes in CEE economies’ exports to China are measured through tendencies in the shares of skill-intensive manufacturing, whose eventual increase would create important conditions for their sustainable and stronger growth. The findings show that with a modest growth of CEE exports to China from 2011 and with a lack of structural improvements, there is no doubt that the scales of economic benefits seem to be tipping in favour of China.","PeriodicalId":43088,"journal":{"name":"Argumenta Oeconomica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argumenta Oeconomica","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15611/aoe.2021.2.03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper discusses the consequences of cooperation between China and CEE countries, also known as 17+1, an initiative founded in 2012 by Beijing to promote business and investment relations between China and those economies. The main hope of CEE countries was that they would be able to reduce their strong trade deficits, but today the question arises whether their expectations were unrealistic. After calculating the quantitative indicators of cumulative CEE trade with China in 2011-2018, the author tested the first hypothesis, i.e. whether structures of merchandise exports from CEE countries have become better adjusted to the commodity imports structure of China. In order to prove that hypothesis, the study used four indicators of similarity: Cosines and the Finger-Kreinin similarity index, as well as the Bray-Curtis and Integrated Similarity Index. To improve the analysis, the author controlled for additional factors such as changes in CEE countries’ export structures through tendencies of shares of medium and high-tech products in their total exports. The second hypothesis is that in the observed period major CEE economies detected positive qualitative changes in their merchandise exports to China. The qualitative changes in CEE economies’ exports to China are measured through tendencies in the shares of skill-intensive manufacturing, whose eventual increase would create important conditions for their sustainable and stronger growth. The findings show that with a modest growth of CEE exports to China from 2011 and with a lack of structural improvements, there is no doubt that the scales of economic benefits seem to be tipping in favour of China.
“17+1”模式启动后中国与中东欧国家贸易结构的变化
本文讨论了中国与中东欧国家合作的后果,也被称为17+1,这是北京于2012年发起的一项倡议,旨在促进中国与这些经济体之间的商业和投资关系。中东欧国家的主要希望是,它们能够减少巨额贸易逆差,但如今的问题是,它们的期望是否不切实际。通过计算2011-2018年中东欧累计对华贸易的量化指标,检验了第一个假设,即中东欧国家的商品出口结构是否更好地适应了中国的商品进口结构。为了证明这一假设,该研究使用了四种相似性指标:余弦和Finger-Kreinin相似性指数,以及布雷-柯蒂斯和综合相似性指数。为了改进分析,作者通过中高技术产品在总出口中所占份额的趋势,控制了其他因素,如中东欧国家出口结构的变化。第二个假设是,在观察期间,中东欧主要经济体对中国的商品出口发生了积极的质的变化。中东欧经济体对中国出口的质变是通过技术密集型制造业份额的趋势来衡量的,其最终增加将为其可持续和更强劲的增长创造重要条件。研究结果表明,自2011年以来,中东欧对中国的出口适度增长,且缺乏结构性改善,毫无疑问,经济利益的天平似乎正在向有利于中国的方向倾斜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信