Taylor and Heidegger’s Critiques of the Projectionist Account of Values and Its Underlying Naturalistic Ontology

IF 0.1 4区 哲学
Min Seol
{"title":"Taylor and Heidegger’s Critiques of the Projectionist Account of Values and Its Underlying Naturalistic Ontology","authors":"Min Seol","doi":"10.15581/009.56.2.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Sources of the Self, Charles Taylor critiques the projectionist account of values and its underlying naturalistic ontology. Likewise, in Being and Time, Martin Heidegger demonstrates that the strata theoretical explanation of practical things invested with values does not adequately describe our experience of them. I aim to demonstrate that if we read these criticisms together, we find ourselves in a better position to reveal the reality of a practical and ethical life. Taylor himself raises the question of what we are committed ontologically in our ethical commitments, but does not develop an answer. Heidegger’s ontological notion of the world in Being and Time could provide a partial answer.","PeriodicalId":42698,"journal":{"name":"Anuario Filosofico","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anuario Filosofico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15581/009.56.2.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Sources of the Self, Charles Taylor critiques the projectionist account of values and its underlying naturalistic ontology. Likewise, in Being and Time, Martin Heidegger demonstrates that the strata theoretical explanation of practical things invested with values does not adequately describe our experience of them. I aim to demonstrate that if we read these criticisms together, we find ourselves in a better position to reveal the reality of a practical and ethical life. Taylor himself raises the question of what we are committed ontologically in our ethical commitments, but does not develop an answer. Heidegger’s ontological notion of the world in Being and Time could provide a partial answer.
泰勒和海德格尔对投射主义价值解释及其潜在的自然主义本体论的批判
在《自我的来源》一书中,查尔斯·泰勒批判了投射主义对价值的解释及其潜在的自然主义本体论。同样,在《存在与时间》中,海德格尔论证了对具有价值的实际事物的分层理论解释并不能充分描述我们对它们的体验。我的目的是证明,如果我们一起阅读这些批评,我们会发现自己处于一个更好的位置,以揭示现实和道德生活的现实。泰勒自己提出了我们在伦理行为中本体论上承诺了什么的问题,但没有给出答案。海德格尔在《存在与时间》中关于世界的本体论概念可以提供部分答案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anuario Filosofico
Anuario Filosofico PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Anuario Filosófico, first published in 1968, is one of the most influential philosophical journals in the Spanish-speaking world. Since its beginning, it has published the work of a significant number of both Spanish and foreign philosophers, including Jan A. Aertsen, Elizabeth Anscombe, Werner Beierwaltes, Michael Dummett, Peter Geach, Susan Haack, Friedrich Kaulbach, Ralph McInerny, Antonio Millán-Puelles, Giovanni Reale and Robert Spaemann.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信