Netiquette, implication of online emotional content and empathy in adolescents according to gender

IF 1.1 4区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.14349/rlp.2022.v54.12

Ana Cebollero-Salinas, J. Cano-Escoriaza, S. Orejudo, Tatiana Íñiguez-Berrozpe

{"title":"Netiquette, implication of online emotional content and empathy in adolescents according to gender","authors":"Ana Cebollero-Salinas, J. Cano-Escoriaza, S. Orejudo, Tatiana Íñiguez-Berrozpe","doi":"10.14349/rlp.2022.v54.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Education in netiquette (social norms that promote cyber coexistence) has become an alternative proposal for helping prevent online expressions of discrimination and violence. Specifically, empathy and online emotional content are key in antisocial behaviours. Method: Our objective is thus to differentially analyse the relationships between netiquette, online emotional content, and empathy in adolescents according to gender. 774 adolescents (55.4% girls) enrolled in 13 Spanish educational centres participated (M = 13.82 and SD = 1345). Results: Results show that girls achieve higher scores in netiquette, online emotional content, and empathy. E-emotional expression in girls and the facilitating use of e-emotions in boys are exclusionary factors of netiquette; however, the understanding and management of e-emotions for both genders, as well as cognitive empathy in boys, are promoter factors. Conclusions: It would be advisable to educate young people in netiquette, where the moderate use of emotional expression online can be an effective strategy to promote it.","PeriodicalId":46559,"journal":{"name":"Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2022.v54.12","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Education in netiquette (social norms that promote cyber coexistence) has become an alternative proposal for helping prevent online expressions of discrimination and violence. Specifically, empathy and online emotional content are key in antisocial behaviours. Method: Our objective is thus to differentially analyse the relationships between netiquette, online emotional content, and empathy in adolescents according to gender. 774 adolescents (55.4% girls) enrolled in 13 Spanish educational centres participated (M = 13.82 and SD = 1345). Results: Results show that girls achieve higher scores in netiquette, online emotional content, and empathy. E-emotional expression in girls and the facilitating use of e-emotions in boys are exclusionary factors of netiquette; however, the understanding and management of e-emotions for both genders, as well as cognitive empathy in boys, are promoter factors. Conclusions: It would be advisable to educate young people in netiquette, where the moderate use of emotional expression online can be an effective strategy to promote it.

查看原文本刊更多论文

网络礼仪、网络情感内容蕴涵与青少年性别共情

导言:网络礼仪(促进网络共存的社会规范)教育已成为帮助防止网上表达歧视和暴力的另一种建议。具体来说，共情和在线情感内容是反社会行为的关键。方法:我们的目的是根据性别差异分析青少年网络礼仪、网络情感内容和共情之间的关系。在13个西班牙教育中心注册的774名青少年(55.4%为女孩)参与了调查(M = 13.82, SD = 1345)。结果:结果显示，女生在网络礼仪、网络情感内容和同理心方面得分更高。女生的e-情绪表达和男生的e-情绪使用是网络礼仪的排他性因素;然而，男女对电子情绪的理解和管理，以及男孩的认知共情是促进因素。结论:建议对青少年进行网络礼仪教育，适度使用网络情感表达是促进青少年网络礼仪的有效策略。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Revista latinoamericana de Psicología (RLP) is a four month publication from Konrad Lorenz Fundación Universitaria. The RLP evaluates works that belong to one of the following categories: original papers (with empiric and new information) of many psychology fields (regardless of the methodology used) or qualitative/quantitative systematic reviews. Eventually it will be interested on works’ revision related to the development psychology tools or softwares, original methodology papers and researches which evaluate psychology from scientometry. The RLP is not interested in publishing non-systematic reviews or states of the art, case studies, protocols studies, hypothesis or papers proposals, letters, commentaries or essays, opinions articles, politics documents nor other sort of secondary literature. Traditionally, there have been monographics, books’ reviews and “others” published in “Mundo de la Psicología”, nevertheless these modalities will not be considered.