Political Science of Modern Kazakhstan – Notices to Development of Kazakhstan Political Thinking

Q2 Social Sciences
P. Juza
{"title":"Political Science of Modern Kazakhstan – Notices to Development of Kazakhstan Political Thinking","authors":"P. Juza","doi":"10.1515/sjps-2016-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The picture of political process as a form of a specific kind of market relations belongs to one of the theoretical issues defined by J. Schumpeter in 1942 in his work “Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy”. Thus, politics is a part of economy, where similarly to the market rules – the competition principles are being used. This was clearly defined also by A. Downs: „...finally, the market exchange is being realised by exchange of the specific policy for votes...“ (Downs, 1957, p. 27-28) Political science and political thinking have deep historical roots in modern Kazakhstan. Within the half of the last millennium, their sources were the works of Arabic-language philosophy in particular, based on both antique values and traditional nomadic Kazakhs ́ world view. Its characteristics were the specific concept of a state, state social structure and from the European point of view different relation between man (individual) and society. As the young chairman of the Royal Court of Justice in Bordeaux, Charles de Secondat Monetsquie, wrote: „...since I am in Europe, dear Radi, I saw many forms of government: not like in Asia, where equal policy rules are in force...“ (Montesquieu, 2009, p. 106) Folk traditions have represented, represent and apparently will further represent the specific model of power relations legitimization, which have been formed during the time of the Kazakh khan rise.2 They were characterized by electiveness of sovereigns – khans, acceptance of the political elite coming from Genghis Khan descendants only, dividing the nation and state in three inseparable parts and rather influential position of judicial power.","PeriodicalId":36889,"journal":{"name":"Slovak Journal of Political Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/sjps-2016-0005","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Slovak Journal of Political Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjps-2016-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The picture of political process as a form of a specific kind of market relations belongs to one of the theoretical issues defined by J. Schumpeter in 1942 in his work “Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy”. Thus, politics is a part of economy, where similarly to the market rules – the competition principles are being used. This was clearly defined also by A. Downs: „...finally, the market exchange is being realised by exchange of the specific policy for votes...“ (Downs, 1957, p. 27-28) Political science and political thinking have deep historical roots in modern Kazakhstan. Within the half of the last millennium, their sources were the works of Arabic-language philosophy in particular, based on both antique values and traditional nomadic Kazakhs ́ world view. Its characteristics were the specific concept of a state, state social structure and from the European point of view different relation between man (individual) and society. As the young chairman of the Royal Court of Justice in Bordeaux, Charles de Secondat Monetsquie, wrote: „...since I am in Europe, dear Radi, I saw many forms of government: not like in Asia, where equal policy rules are in force...“ (Montesquieu, 2009, p. 106) Folk traditions have represented, represent and apparently will further represent the specific model of power relations legitimization, which have been formed during the time of the Kazakh khan rise.2 They were characterized by electiveness of sovereigns – khans, acceptance of the political elite coming from Genghis Khan descendants only, dividing the nation and state in three inseparable parts and rather influential position of judicial power.
近代哈萨克斯坦的政治学——对哈萨克斯坦政治思想发展的注意
政治过程作为一种特定的市场关系形式的图景,属于熊彼特1942年在其著作《资本主义、社会主义与民主》中所界定的理论问题之一。因此,政治是经济的一部分,与市场规则类似,竞争原则正在被使用。A. Downs对此也有明确的定义:“……最后,市场交换是通过特定政策交换选票来实现的……(Downs, 1957,第27-28页)政治学和政治思想在现代哈萨克斯坦有着深厚的历史根源。在上个千年的一半时间里,它们的来源是阿拉伯语哲学著作,特别是基于古代价值观和传统游牧哈萨克人的世界观。其特点是国家的具体概念、国家的社会结构以及从欧洲人的观点来看人(个人)与社会的不同关系。年轻的波尔多皇家法院院长查尔斯·德·塞诺帕特·莫奈茨基写道:“……亲爱的拉迪,既然我在欧洲,我看到了多种形式的政府:不像在亚洲,那里实行平等的政策规则……(孟德斯鸠,2009,p. 106)民间传统已经代表、代表并显然将进一步代表哈萨克可汗崛起时期形成的权力关系合法化的特定模式它们的特点是君主——可汗的选举制,只接受来自成吉思汗后裔的政治精英,将民族和国家分为不可分割的三个部分,以及具有相当影响力的司法权地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Slovak Journal of Political Sciences
Slovak Journal of Political Sciences Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信