Death by the Numbers

IF 0.6 3区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
Benjamin Schultz-Figueroa
{"title":"Death by the Numbers","authors":"Benjamin Schultz-Figueroa","doi":"10.1525/fq.2022.75.4.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay, Benjamin Schultz-Figueroa presents an analysis of two recent “multispecies documentaries”: Cow (Andrea Arnold, 2021) and Gunda (Viktor Kossakovsky, 2021). He suggests that both films prompt viewers to think expansively about the onscreen animals as sociopolitical subjects and in doing so, to rethink political society at large. Challenging the persistent conflation of authenticity, empathy, and political action used to promote films like these, Schultz-Figueroa argues that the films’ value instead lies in creating a sense of contingency whereby contemplation, evaluation, irony, and finally judgment is made possible. In being willing to imagine animals destined for the slaughterhouse as important historical phenomena in their own right, Cow and Gunda transform their nonhuman protagonists into essential figures for understanding the broader political milieu.","PeriodicalId":45540,"journal":{"name":"FILM QUARTERLY","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FILM QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/fq.2022.75.4.47","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this essay, Benjamin Schultz-Figueroa presents an analysis of two recent “multispecies documentaries”: Cow (Andrea Arnold, 2021) and Gunda (Viktor Kossakovsky, 2021). He suggests that both films prompt viewers to think expansively about the onscreen animals as sociopolitical subjects and in doing so, to rethink political society at large. Challenging the persistent conflation of authenticity, empathy, and political action used to promote films like these, Schultz-Figueroa argues that the films’ value instead lies in creating a sense of contingency whereby contemplation, evaluation, irony, and finally judgment is made possible. In being willing to imagine animals destined for the slaughterhouse as important historical phenomena in their own right, Cow and Gunda transform their nonhuman protagonists into essential figures for understanding the broader political milieu.
数字死亡
在这篇文章中,Benjamin Schultz-Figueroa对最近的两部“多物种纪录片”进行了分析:Cow (Andrea Arnold, 2021)和Gunda (Viktor Kossakovsky, 2021)。他认为,这两部电影都促使观众广泛地思考屏幕上的动物作为社会政治主题,并在此过程中重新思考整个政治社会。舒尔茨-菲格罗亚认为,电影的价值在于创造一种偶然性,通过这种偶然性,沉思、评价、讽刺和最终的判断成为可能。他对这种将真实性、同理心和政治行动混为一谈的做法提出了挑战。牛和冈达愿意把被送往屠宰场的动物想象成具有自身权利的重要历史现象,他们把非人类的主角变成了理解更广泛政治环境的重要人物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FILM QUARTERLY
FILM QUARTERLY FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
40.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Film Quarterly has been publishing substantial, peer-reviewed writing on motion pictures since 1958, earning a reputation as the most authoritative academic film journal in the United States. Its wide array of topics, perspectives, and approaches appeals to film scholars and film buffs alike. If you love all types of movies and are eager to encounter new ways of thinking about them, then Film Quarterly is the journal for you! Scholarly analyses of international cinemas, current blockbusters and Hollywood classics, documentaries, animation, and independent, avant-garde, and experimental film and video fill the pages of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信