Altering Physical Properties of Wilted Alfalfa by Impact – Shredding Processing

IF 0.8 4区 农林科学 Q4 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
David A. Pintens, K. Shinners, Joshua C. Friede, M. Digman, K. Kalscheur
{"title":"Altering Physical Properties of Wilted Alfalfa by Impact – Shredding Processing","authors":"David A. Pintens, K. Shinners, Joshua C. Friede, M. Digman, K. Kalscheur","doi":"10.13031/aea.15168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"HighlightsA screenless hammermill utilizing impact and shredding was used to process wilted alfalfa.Processing increased specific surface area and ruptured plant cells as quantified by a processing level index.Processed material was more compliant than the chopped material resulting in 26% to 56% greater compacted density.Processing reduced silage pH and increased fermentation acids compared to the chopped silage.Abstract. Intensive mechanical processing of wilted alfalfa could potentially increase ruminant utilization of alfalfa. A novel forage processing mechanism which combines impact and shredding was used to investigate intensive physical disruption of wilted alfalfa. Physical disruption was quantified by a processing level index (PLI) defined as the ratio of treatment leachate conductivity relative to that of an ultimately processed treatment. Utilizing this index, four processing levels defined by the number of passes through the processor were compared to a control treatment of conventionally chopped material. Processing three times through the processing device achieved a PLI of greater than 60%, with the greatest increase in PLI occurring in the first pass through the device. Processing reduced particle-size, but 45% to 56% of the material dry mass was greater than 6 mm at the greatest processing level. Processing severely disrupted the mechanical structure of the stems, making them more compliant resulting in 26% to 56% greater compacted density than the chopped control. Processing reduced silage pH and increased fermentation acids compared to the chopped silage, indicating processing improved silage quality. Keywords: Alfalfa, Density, Haylage, Impact, Particle-size, Shredding.","PeriodicalId":55501,"journal":{"name":"Applied Engineering in Agriculture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Engineering in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13031/aea.15168","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

HighlightsA screenless hammermill utilizing impact and shredding was used to process wilted alfalfa.Processing increased specific surface area and ruptured plant cells as quantified by a processing level index.Processed material was more compliant than the chopped material resulting in 26% to 56% greater compacted density.Processing reduced silage pH and increased fermentation acids compared to the chopped silage.Abstract. Intensive mechanical processing of wilted alfalfa could potentially increase ruminant utilization of alfalfa. A novel forage processing mechanism which combines impact and shredding was used to investigate intensive physical disruption of wilted alfalfa. Physical disruption was quantified by a processing level index (PLI) defined as the ratio of treatment leachate conductivity relative to that of an ultimately processed treatment. Utilizing this index, four processing levels defined by the number of passes through the processor were compared to a control treatment of conventionally chopped material. Processing three times through the processing device achieved a PLI of greater than 60%, with the greatest increase in PLI occurring in the first pass through the device. Processing reduced particle-size, but 45% to 56% of the material dry mass was greater than 6 mm at the greatest processing level. Processing severely disrupted the mechanical structure of the stems, making them more compliant resulting in 26% to 56% greater compacted density than the chopped control. Processing reduced silage pH and increased fermentation acids compared to the chopped silage, indicating processing improved silage quality. Keywords: Alfalfa, Density, Haylage, Impact, Particle-size, Shredding.
冲击粉碎加工对萎蔫苜蓿物理特性的影响
采用冲击粉碎的无筛锤磨机对枯萎苜蓿进行加工。加工增加了比表面积和破裂的植物细胞,通过加工水平指数量化。加工后的材料比切碎后的材料更柔顺,压实密度提高26%至56%。与切碎青贮相比,加工降低了青贮的pH值,增加了发酵酸。对枯萎苜蓿进行精深机械加工,有提高苜蓿反刍动物利用率的潜力。采用冲击与粉碎相结合的新型饲草加工机制,研究了枯萎苜蓿的强物理破坏。物理破坏通过处理水平指数(PLI)来量化,该指数定义为处理渗滤液电导率相对于最终处理处理的电导率的比值。利用这一指标,四个加工水平定义通过处理器的数量进行比较,以控制处理常规切碎的材料。通过该处理装置进行三次处理,获得了大于60%的PLI,其中第一次通过该装置时PLI增幅最大。加工降低了颗粒尺寸,但在最大加工水平下,45% ~ 56%的物料干质量大于6 mm。加工严重破坏了茎的机械结构,使其更柔顺,导致压实密度比切碎的对照组高26%至56%。与切碎青贮相比,加工降低了青贮的pH值,增加了发酵酸,说明加工提高了青贮品质。关键词:紫花苜蓿,密度,干草,冲击,粒度,切碎
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Engineering in Agriculture
Applied Engineering in Agriculture 农林科学-农业工程
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal publishes applications of engineering and technology research that address agricultural, food, and biological systems problems. Submissions must include results of practical experiences, tests, or trials presented in a manner and style that will allow easy adaptation by others; results of reviews or studies of installations or applications with substantially new or significant information not readily available in other refereed publications; or a description of successful methods of techniques of education, outreach, or technology transfer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信