Intervention Improved Health Workers' Neonatal Resuscitation Skills and Knowledge, but Not Neonatal Mortality

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 Social Sciences
J. Rosenberg
{"title":"Intervention Improved Health Workers' Neonatal Resuscitation Skills and Knowledge, but Not Neonatal Mortality","authors":"J. Rosenberg","doi":"10.1363/intsexrephea.42.3.165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Health care workers who participated in a mobile phone-based safe delivery intervention had greater skills and knowledge regarding neonatal resuscitation than control workers, according to a cluster-randomized clinical trial conducted at 70 health care facilities in rural Ethiopia. (1) Neonatal resuscitation skills scores six months and 12 months after implementation of the safe delivery app intervention were higher among intervention health care workers than among controls (mean differences, 6.0 and 8.8 points, respectively); neonatal resuscitation knowledge was higher among intervention health care workers than among controls at six months postimplementation (mean difference, 1.7 points), but not at 12 months. The intervention was not associated with a significant change in perinatal mortality of infants delivered at study health care facilities. The safe delivery app was designed to provide health care workers in low-income countries with the knowledge and skills to manage obstetric and neonatal emergencies; the app consisted of videos on topics such as neonatal resuscitation, as well as a catalog of essential obstetric drugs and equipment. To examine whether use of the app was associated with changes in perinatal mortality rates and in health care workers' knowledge and skill levels, researchers conducted a cluster-randomized clinical trial of health care facilities in five rural districts of Ethiopia's Oromiya region. Of the 131 facilities that were screened, 70 met the study's eligibility criteria (i.e., having a midwife or health extension worker on staff and having been the site of deliveries in the previous year) and were included in the study sample. Half of eligible facilities were randomly selected to the intervention group and were supplied with smartphones loaded with the safe delivery app; health care workers at intervention facilities received a one-day training session on how to use the phones and app. The other half of facilities were selected to the control group, and did not receive phones or additional training; the researchers ensured that both intervention and control facilities had an adequate package of drugs and equipment. Between September 2013 and February 2015, data were collected on women delivering at study facilities and on their birth outcomes; women were contacted in person or by phone seven days after delivery to follow up about perinatal mortality. In addition, facility health care workers' knowledge and skills regarding neonatal resuscitation were assessed by questionnaire and structured assessment tools (e.g., simulated scenarios using mannequins) before implementation of the intervention and at six and 12 months afterward. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were used to compare perinatal mortality rates at intervention and control facilities, and to compare health care workers' neonatal resuscitation knowledge and skills index scores over time. The analysis sample included 1,474 women in the intervention group and 1,665 in the control group. Most women in each group (>85%) reported being younger than 29, having a primary or lower education and being a housewife; more than one-third of women in each group were pregnant for the first time. …","PeriodicalId":46940,"journal":{"name":"International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1363/intsexrephea.42.3.165","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health care workers who participated in a mobile phone-based safe delivery intervention had greater skills and knowledge regarding neonatal resuscitation than control workers, according to a cluster-randomized clinical trial conducted at 70 health care facilities in rural Ethiopia. (1) Neonatal resuscitation skills scores six months and 12 months after implementation of the safe delivery app intervention were higher among intervention health care workers than among controls (mean differences, 6.0 and 8.8 points, respectively); neonatal resuscitation knowledge was higher among intervention health care workers than among controls at six months postimplementation (mean difference, 1.7 points), but not at 12 months. The intervention was not associated with a significant change in perinatal mortality of infants delivered at study health care facilities. The safe delivery app was designed to provide health care workers in low-income countries with the knowledge and skills to manage obstetric and neonatal emergencies; the app consisted of videos on topics such as neonatal resuscitation, as well as a catalog of essential obstetric drugs and equipment. To examine whether use of the app was associated with changes in perinatal mortality rates and in health care workers' knowledge and skill levels, researchers conducted a cluster-randomized clinical trial of health care facilities in five rural districts of Ethiopia's Oromiya region. Of the 131 facilities that were screened, 70 met the study's eligibility criteria (i.e., having a midwife or health extension worker on staff and having been the site of deliveries in the previous year) and were included in the study sample. Half of eligible facilities were randomly selected to the intervention group and were supplied with smartphones loaded with the safe delivery app; health care workers at intervention facilities received a one-day training session on how to use the phones and app. The other half of facilities were selected to the control group, and did not receive phones or additional training; the researchers ensured that both intervention and control facilities had an adequate package of drugs and equipment. Between September 2013 and February 2015, data were collected on women delivering at study facilities and on their birth outcomes; women were contacted in person or by phone seven days after delivery to follow up about perinatal mortality. In addition, facility health care workers' knowledge and skills regarding neonatal resuscitation were assessed by questionnaire and structured assessment tools (e.g., simulated scenarios using mannequins) before implementation of the intervention and at six and 12 months afterward. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were used to compare perinatal mortality rates at intervention and control facilities, and to compare health care workers' neonatal resuscitation knowledge and skills index scores over time. The analysis sample included 1,474 women in the intervention group and 1,665 in the control group. Most women in each group (>85%) reported being younger than 29, having a primary or lower education and being a housewife; more than one-third of women in each group were pregnant for the first time. …
干预措施提高了卫生工作者的新生儿复苏技能和知识,但没有提高新生儿死亡率
根据在埃塞俄比亚农村70家卫生保健机构进行的一项分组随机临床试验,参与基于移动电话的安全分娩干预的卫生保健工作者比对照组的工作人员在新生儿复苏方面具有更高的技能和知识。(1)实施安全分娩app干预后6个月和12个月,干预医护人员的新生儿复苏技能得分高于对照组(平均差异分别为6.0分和8.8分);干预后6个月,医护人员对新生儿复苏的了解程度高于对照组(平均差异为1.7分),但12个月时则无此差异。干预与在研究卫生保健机构分娩的婴儿围产期死亡率的显著变化无关。安全分娩应用程序旨在为低收入国家的卫生保健工作者提供管理产科和新生儿紧急情况的知识和技能;该应用程序包括有关新生儿复苏等主题的视频,以及基本产科药物和设备的目录。为了研究该应用程序的使用是否与围产期死亡率的变化以及医护人员的知识和技能水平有关,研究人员在埃塞俄比亚奥罗米亚地区的五个农村地区的医疗机构进行了一项集群随机临床试验。在筛选的131个设施中,有70个符合研究的资格标准(即,工作人员中有助产士或保健推广人员,并且在前一年曾是分娩地点),并被纳入研究样本。一半符合条件的设施被随机选择到干预组,并提供装有安全交付应用程序的智能手机;干预机构的卫生保健工作者接受了为期一天的关于如何使用手机和应用程序的培训。另一半机构被选为对照组,没有接受手机或额外的培训;研究人员确保干预和控制设施都有足够的药物和设备。在2013年9月至2015年2月期间,收集了在研究机构分娩的妇女及其分娩结果的数据;分娩后7天亲自或通过电话联系妇女,以跟踪围产期死亡率。此外,在实施干预前和干预后6个月和12个月,通过问卷调查和结构化评估工具(例如,使用人体模型模拟情景)评估了设施卫生保健工作者关于新生儿复苏的知识和技能。采用描述性和逻辑回归分析比较干预和控制设施的围产期死亡率,并比较医护人员的新生儿复苏知识和技能指数得分随时间的变化。分析样本包括干预组的1474名妇女和对照组的1665名妇女。每组中大多数女性(约85%)报告年龄在29岁以下,受过小学或更低的教育,是家庭主妇;每组中都有超过三分之一的女性是第一次怀孕。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信