Mechanism of Electrical Defibrillation: Current Status and Future Perspective

IF 0.8 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
N. Shibata, S. Inada, K. Nakazawa, Naoki Tomii, M. Yamazaki, Hiroshi Seno, H. Honjo, I. Sakuma
{"title":"Mechanism of Electrical Defibrillation: Current Status and Future Perspective","authors":"N. Shibata, S. Inada, K. Nakazawa, Naoki Tomii, M. Yamazaki, Hiroshi Seno, H. Honjo, I. Sakuma","doi":"10.14326/abe.9.125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is currently a major cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD). To cure VF, electrical defibrillation is the only therapy. However, strong energy is required. Thus, to reduce the energy or develop a new method is desired. The mechanism of how the electric shock sweeps VF is still controversial. In this article, we summarize evidence and remaining problems of this topic. There are three issues in time sequence of VF: how to initiate, how to continue, and how to terminate. Many investigations to achieve VF-free heart have been reported, but there are currently no definite methods to prevent VF. Thus, to terminate VF is one of the big challenges to prevent SCD. There are two strategies to improve electrical defibrillation: elucidate the substantial mechanism and reduce the energy. (1) Substantial mechanism proposed: In a failed defibrillation episode, at the energy level of the near defibrillation threshold, the initial activation site is related to the repolarization phase of the location. However, it is still not clear whether it is part of the continuous VF activity or initiation of re-VF. It is well known that strong field electric shock (including cathodal and anodal stimuli) has many effects on the cardiac tissue, such as electroporation, virtual electrode effects, and electrophysiological responses, which are influenced by tissue geometry (including fiber orientation and bifurcation of tissues). These phenomena should modify the defibrillation effect. Finally, the characteristics of dynamic spiral wave (SW; the sources of continuity of re-entries) influence the continuity of VF. (2) Efforts to reduce the defibrillation energy: To reduce the defibrillation energy, biphasic pulse, regional cooling, modified stimuli programs, and automated local stimuli to SW are proposed. The superiority of biphasic pulse to monophasic pulse was established in the late 20th century; however, the mechanism is still not well understood. Cooling of some region of the heart ventricles widens the route of SW trajectory and terminates SW. Programming high frequency stimulus or double stimuli according to computer simulation of the heart model could reduce the defibrillation threshold. Automated local stimulus to the site between the tail of SW activation and the next activation front could terminate the SW.","PeriodicalId":54017,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Biomedical Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14326/abe.9.125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is currently a major cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD). To cure VF, electrical defibrillation is the only therapy. However, strong energy is required. Thus, to reduce the energy or develop a new method is desired. The mechanism of how the electric shock sweeps VF is still controversial. In this article, we summarize evidence and remaining problems of this topic. There are three issues in time sequence of VF: how to initiate, how to continue, and how to terminate. Many investigations to achieve VF-free heart have been reported, but there are currently no definite methods to prevent VF. Thus, to terminate VF is one of the big challenges to prevent SCD. There are two strategies to improve electrical defibrillation: elucidate the substantial mechanism and reduce the energy. (1) Substantial mechanism proposed: In a failed defibrillation episode, at the energy level of the near defibrillation threshold, the initial activation site is related to the repolarization phase of the location. However, it is still not clear whether it is part of the continuous VF activity or initiation of re-VF. It is well known that strong field electric shock (including cathodal and anodal stimuli) has many effects on the cardiac tissue, such as electroporation, virtual electrode effects, and electrophysiological responses, which are influenced by tissue geometry (including fiber orientation and bifurcation of tissues). These phenomena should modify the defibrillation effect. Finally, the characteristics of dynamic spiral wave (SW; the sources of continuity of re-entries) influence the continuity of VF. (2) Efforts to reduce the defibrillation energy: To reduce the defibrillation energy, biphasic pulse, regional cooling, modified stimuli programs, and automated local stimuli to SW are proposed. The superiority of biphasic pulse to monophasic pulse was established in the late 20th century; however, the mechanism is still not well understood. Cooling of some region of the heart ventricles widens the route of SW trajectory and terminates SW. Programming high frequency stimulus or double stimuli according to computer simulation of the heart model could reduce the defibrillation threshold. Automated local stimulus to the site between the tail of SW activation and the next activation front could terminate the SW.
电除颤机制:现状与未来展望
心室颤动(VF)是目前心脏性猝死(SCD)的主要原因。为了治疗室颤,电除颤是唯一的治疗方法。然而,需要强大的能量。因此,需要减少能量或开发一种新方法。电击扫频的机制仍有争议。在本文中,我们总结了这一主题的证据和存在的问题。VF的时间顺序有三个问题:如何启动、如何继续、如何终止。报道了许多实现无VF心脏的研究,但目前还没有明确的方法来预防VF。因此,终止VF是防止SCD的最大挑战之一。改进电除颤的策略有两个:阐明电除颤的实质机制和降低电除颤的能量。(1)提出的实质机制:在除颤失败时,在除颤阈值附近的能量水平上,初始激活位点与复极相的位置有关。然而,目前尚不清楚它是持续的VF活动的一部分还是重新VF的开始。众所周知,强场电击(包括阴极和阳极刺激)对心脏组织有许多影响,如电穿孔、虚电极效应和电生理反应,这些影响受组织几何形状(包括纤维取向和组织分叉)的影响。这些现象应改变除颤效果。最后,分析了动态螺旋波(SW;再入的连续性来源)影响VF的连续性。(2)努力减少除颤能量:为了减少除颤能量,提出了双相脉冲、局部冷却、改进刺激方案和自动局部刺激SW。20世纪后期确立了双相脉冲相对于单相脉冲的优越性;然而,其机制仍未得到很好的理解。心脏心室部分区域的冷却使脑卒中轨迹变宽,最终导致脑卒中终止。根据计算机模拟心脏模型,编制高频刺激或双刺激,可降低除颤阈值。在脑电信号激活的尾部和下一个脑电信号激活的前端之间的位置进行自动局部刺激可以终止脑电信号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advanced Biomedical Engineering
Advanced Biomedical Engineering ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信