Contemporary Afghanistan Outlook: Between Counterinsurgency and Search of the Social Contract

Andrius Bivainis
{"title":"Contemporary Afghanistan Outlook: Between Counterinsurgency and Search of the Social Contract","authors":"Andrius Bivainis","doi":"10.1515/ijas-2015-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article is based on reassessment of the contemporary results of counterinsurgency and nation-building in Afghanistan. Nation-building initiatives have been started in the country since the Bonn agreement in December 2001. This agreement brought into reality the current governing system of Afghanistan. Counterinsurgency in Afghanistan has been initiated in full mode since 2009 after a sound success on Iraqi frontier. However, each operational area is bringing its own specifics into play. The same was with Afghanistan. The newly established constitutional presidential republic has faced with inheritance of unresolved sensitive ethnical identity issues, confrontation between different groups for self-governing authority and security of essential resources. These preconditions have brought a diversified and even confrontational social environment into reality. Prolonged military operations in Afghanistan could show that diversified social environment and misevaluated cultural heritage has led to misleading assumptions that centralized presidential governing system could become an effective ruling model for post-Taliban country. One of the key notions of this article is that historical lessons taught by long years of colonialist rule in Afghanistan has not been learned and misevaluation of diversified and confrontational local entities has brought another historical lesson of Afghan tribal resistance. More than that, diversified and confrontational entities of Afghanistan have not been a favorable subject for possible social contract. The term social contract was introduced as explanatory method of national political behavior and systemic structure by Jean Jacques Rousseau in 18th century Europe. Afghan society has become the subject to this model of political philosophy only as counterinsurgency campaign gained full capabilities around 2009. Reassessment of long term nation building efforts in this article is based on evaluation of Afghan social contract’s progress.","PeriodicalId":30602,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Area Studies","volume":"10 1","pages":"119 - 138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/ijas-2015-0006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Area Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ijas-2015-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article is based on reassessment of the contemporary results of counterinsurgency and nation-building in Afghanistan. Nation-building initiatives have been started in the country since the Bonn agreement in December 2001. This agreement brought into reality the current governing system of Afghanistan. Counterinsurgency in Afghanistan has been initiated in full mode since 2009 after a sound success on Iraqi frontier. However, each operational area is bringing its own specifics into play. The same was with Afghanistan. The newly established constitutional presidential republic has faced with inheritance of unresolved sensitive ethnical identity issues, confrontation between different groups for self-governing authority and security of essential resources. These preconditions have brought a diversified and even confrontational social environment into reality. Prolonged military operations in Afghanistan could show that diversified social environment and misevaluated cultural heritage has led to misleading assumptions that centralized presidential governing system could become an effective ruling model for post-Taliban country. One of the key notions of this article is that historical lessons taught by long years of colonialist rule in Afghanistan has not been learned and misevaluation of diversified and confrontational local entities has brought another historical lesson of Afghan tribal resistance. More than that, diversified and confrontational entities of Afghanistan have not been a favorable subject for possible social contract. The term social contract was introduced as explanatory method of national political behavior and systemic structure by Jean Jacques Rousseau in 18th century Europe. Afghan society has become the subject to this model of political philosophy only as counterinsurgency campaign gained full capabilities around 2009. Reassessment of long term nation building efforts in this article is based on evaluation of Afghan social contract’s progress.
当代阿富汗前景:在平叛与寻求社会契约之间
本文基于对阿富汗当代反叛乱和国家建设成果的重新评估。自2001年12月《波恩协定》以来,该国开始了国家建设倡议。这项协定使阿富汗目前的管理制度成为现实。自2009年在伊拉克边境取得圆满成功后,阿富汗的反叛乱行动全面启动。然而,每个业务领域都有自己的特点。阿富汗也是如此。新成立的宪法总统制共和国面临着遗留下来的尚未解决的敏感的种族认同问题、不同群体之间为自治权力的对抗以及基本资源的安全问题。这些先决条件使社会环境多样化,甚至对抗性成为现实。在阿富汗的长期军事行动可能表明,多元化的社会环境和对文化遗产的错误评估导致了一种误导性的假设,即中央集权的总统制可能成为后塔利班国家的有效统治模式。本文的一个关键观点是,阿富汗长期殖民主义统治所带来的历史教训没有被吸取,对多样化和对抗性的地方实体的错误评估带来了阿富汗部落抵抗的另一个历史教训。不仅如此,阿富汗的多样化和对抗性实体并不是可能的社会契约的有利对象。社会契约一词是18世纪欧洲由卢梭作为解释国家政治行为和制度结构的方法引入的。阿富汗社会只是在2009年左右反叛乱运动获得充分能力后才成为这种政治哲学模式的主题。本文对长期国家建设努力的重新评估是基于对阿富汗社会契约进展的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信