Beyond heteronormativity towards social justice: Disrupting gender operationalisation in teaching and learning trends in higher education

Q3 Social Sciences
Zahraa McDonald, S. Motala
{"title":"Beyond heteronormativity towards social justice: Disrupting gender operationalisation in teaching and learning trends in higher education","authors":"Zahraa McDonald, S. Motala","doi":"10.14426/cristal.v10i1.572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantitative approaches, based on numerical analyses of operationalised variables, used to present teaching and learning trends in higher education, are pervasive. However, teaching and learning trends disaggregated by gender are generally collected and/or reported according to a binary operationalisation. The gender binary is associated with heteronormative dispositions. This paper examines the extent to which gender operationalisation, as it relates specifically to teaching and learning trends in South Africa, promotes heteronormative dispositions and the consequent implications for social justice. Framed within Nancy Fraser’s approach to social justice, heteronormative dispositions constitute misrecognition and hence injustice. Based on a review of data gathering and reporting on teaching and learning trends by the Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET), it is clear that, at present, non-binary expressions or analyses of gender are misrecognised. The paper argues that gender operationalisation associated with trends in teaching and learning contributes to heteronormative dispositions that are not commensurate with social justice. It calls for the disruption of binary gender operationalisation linked to teaching and learning trends as a mechanism for full recognition and socially just knowledge production. This paper does not focus on research in a moment of social disruption but rather seeks to disrupt research processes which could be exclusionary and promote injustice, and thus interrupt socially-unjust representations, specifically as it relates to gender.","PeriodicalId":36957,"journal":{"name":"Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14426/cristal.v10i1.572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantitative approaches, based on numerical analyses of operationalised variables, used to present teaching and learning trends in higher education, are pervasive. However, teaching and learning trends disaggregated by gender are generally collected and/or reported according to a binary operationalisation. The gender binary is associated with heteronormative dispositions. This paper examines the extent to which gender operationalisation, as it relates specifically to teaching and learning trends in South Africa, promotes heteronormative dispositions and the consequent implications for social justice. Framed within Nancy Fraser’s approach to social justice, heteronormative dispositions constitute misrecognition and hence injustice. Based on a review of data gathering and reporting on teaching and learning trends by the Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET), it is clear that, at present, non-binary expressions or analyses of gender are misrecognised. The paper argues that gender operationalisation associated with trends in teaching and learning contributes to heteronormative dispositions that are not commensurate with social justice. It calls for the disruption of binary gender operationalisation linked to teaching and learning trends as a mechanism for full recognition and socially just knowledge production. This paper does not focus on research in a moment of social disruption but rather seeks to disrupt research processes which could be exclusionary and promote injustice, and thus interrupt socially-unjust representations, specifically as it relates to gender.
超越异性恋规范走向社会正义:在高等教育的教学和学习趋势中破坏性别操作化
基于可操作变量的数值分析的定量方法在高等教育中广泛应用,用于呈现教学趋势。然而,按性别分类的教学和学习趋势通常是根据二元操作化收集和/或报告的。性别二元与异性恋倾向有关。本文考察了性别操作化在多大程度上,因为它与南非的教学和学习趋势特别相关,促进了异性恋倾向及其对社会正义的影响。在南希·弗雷泽(Nancy Fraser)的社会正义方法框架内,异性恋倾向构成了误解,因此构成了不公正。根据高等教育和培训部(DHET)对教学和学习趋势的数据收集和报告的审查,很明显,目前对性别的非二元表达或分析是错误的。本文认为,与教学趋势相关的性别操作化有助于与社会正义不相称的异性恋倾向。它呼吁打破与教学趋势相关的二元性别操作化,作为充分认识和社会公正知识生产的机制。本文不关注社会混乱时刻的研究,而是试图破坏可能具有排斥性和促进不公正的研究过程,从而中断社会不公正的表征,特别是与性别有关的表征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning
Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书