Using scaffolding academic literacy practices in tertiary classrooms: A South African case study

Q3 Social Sciences
C. Bertram, Kathryn Johnson, J. Goldring
{"title":"Using scaffolding academic literacy practices in tertiary classrooms: A South African case study","authors":"C. Bertram, Kathryn Johnson, J. Goldring","doi":"10.14426/cristal.v10i1.515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Academic development research supports embedding academic literacies development in disciplinary teaching. This enables students to experience reading and writing as disciplinary academic practices. However, few lecturers have the language knowledge and the pedagogical expertise to do this. The Reading to Learn pedagogy provides a scaffolded methodology that lecturers in higher education can adapt. We reflect on our own experiences of using these scaffolded academic literacy practices in three cases: with first year biology students, biochemistry Honours students and Masters in Education students. We argue that scaffolded academic literacy practices are useful because they emphasise both the reading and writing of texts in the discipline, provide an educational approach to plagiarism by modelling how to meaningfully paraphrase academic text, and support learner engagement. Additionally, the professional learning opportunities help academics to develop both knowledge of language and a clear methodology which can be adapted to a range of disciplines and levels.","PeriodicalId":36957,"journal":{"name":"Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14426/cristal.v10i1.515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Academic development research supports embedding academic literacies development in disciplinary teaching. This enables students to experience reading and writing as disciplinary academic practices. However, few lecturers have the language knowledge and the pedagogical expertise to do this. The Reading to Learn pedagogy provides a scaffolded methodology that lecturers in higher education can adapt. We reflect on our own experiences of using these scaffolded academic literacy practices in three cases: with first year biology students, biochemistry Honours students and Masters in Education students. We argue that scaffolded academic literacy practices are useful because they emphasise both the reading and writing of texts in the discipline, provide an educational approach to plagiarism by modelling how to meaningfully paraphrase academic text, and support learner engagement. Additionally, the professional learning opportunities help academics to develop both knowledge of language and a clear methodology which can be adapted to a range of disciplines and levels.
在高等教育课堂中使用脚手架进行学术扫盲实践:一个南非的案例研究
学术发展研究支持在学科教学中嵌入学术素养发展。这使学生能够体验阅读和写作作为学科的学术实践。然而,很少有讲师有语言知识和教学专业知识来做到这一点。“从阅读中学习”教学法为高等教育的讲师提供了一种可以适应的框架教学法。我们在三个案例中反思了我们自己使用这些脚手架式的学术素养实践的经验:生物学一年级学生、生物化学荣誉学生和教育学硕士学生。我们认为,框架学术素养实践是有用的,因为它们强调学科文本的阅读和写作,通过模拟如何有意义地解释学术文本,为剽窃提供了一种教育方法,并支持学习者参与。此外,专业学习机会有助于学者发展语言知识和明确的方法,可以适应各种学科和水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning
Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书