Introduction of a non-ported peripheral intravenous catheter with multi-use blood control septum offers improvements in the overall efficiency of the procedure and is clinically well accepted
D. M. Cooper, M. Whitfield, D. Newton, J. Chiarella, K. Machaczek
{"title":"Introduction of a non-ported peripheral intravenous catheter with multi-use blood control septum offers improvements in the overall efficiency of the procedure and is clinically well accepted","authors":"D. M. Cooper, M. Whitfield, D. Newton, J. Chiarella, K. Machaczek","doi":"10.1504/IJHTM.2016.078336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Financial challenges that the National Health Service (NHS), England, faces may jeopardise its future. This study evaluated the direct cost of using two different safety peripheral intravenous cannulae (SPIVC) with and without a blood control septum, including the cost of device and clinician time. Observation of 103 cannulations demonstrated a 54 second (29%) time reduction per cannulation with the non-ported SPIVC with multi-use blood control septum (Introcan Safety® 3 B Braun), compared to the standard ported SPIVC (Vasofix® Safety B Braun) (P < 0.05). The direct cost analysis, including clinician time, demonstrated that the introduction of SPIVC with multi-use blood control septum could offer time efficiency savings equivalent to a reduction in average cannulation costs by 25%. 82% of users perceived the insertion of SPIVC with multi-use blood control septum to be easy to use; 82% would choose to use it in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":51933,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management","volume":"15 1","pages":"177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/IJHTM.2016.078336","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHTM.2016.078336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Financial challenges that the National Health Service (NHS), England, faces may jeopardise its future. This study evaluated the direct cost of using two different safety peripheral intravenous cannulae (SPIVC) with and without a blood control septum, including the cost of device and clinician time. Observation of 103 cannulations demonstrated a 54 second (29%) time reduction per cannulation with the non-ported SPIVC with multi-use blood control septum (Introcan Safety® 3 B Braun), compared to the standard ported SPIVC (Vasofix® Safety B Braun) (P < 0.05). The direct cost analysis, including clinician time, demonstrated that the introduction of SPIVC with multi-use blood control septum could offer time efficiency savings equivalent to a reduction in average cannulation costs by 25%. 82% of users perceived the insertion of SPIVC with multi-use blood control septum to be easy to use; 82% would choose to use it in clinical practice.
英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)面临的财政挑战可能会危及其未来。本研究评估了使用两种不同的安全外周静脉插管(SPIVC)的直接成本,包括设备成本和临床时间。103次插管的观察表明,与标准端口SPIVC (Vasofix®Safety B Braun)相比,使用多用途血液控制隔(Introcan Safety®3 B Braun)的非端口SPIVC每次插管时间减少54秒(29%)(P < 0.05)。包括临床医生时间在内的直接成本分析表明,引入SPIVC和多用途血液控制隔膜可以节省时间效率,相当于平均降低25%的插管成本。82%的用户认为SPIVC与多用途血液控制隔膜的插入易于使用;82%的人会选择在临床实践中使用它。
期刊介绍:
IJHTM is a new series emerging from the International Journal of Technology Management. It provides an international forum and refereed authoritative sources of information in the fields of management, economics and the management of technology in healthcare.